Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how chess-playing language models can develop internal representations of the game, known as "emergent world models".
- The researchers investigate how these models estimate latent variables, such as the positions and relationships of chess pieces, to reason about the game.
- The insights from this research could have implications for understanding how large language models (LLMs) form mental representations of complex environments and tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study looked at how artificial intelligence (AI) systems that play chess can develop their own internal models of the game. These "emergent world models" allow the AI to understand and reason about the positions and relationships of the chess pieces on the board.
By analyzing the inner workings of these chess-playing language models, the researchers gained insights into how large language models in general might form mental representations of complex environments and tasks. This could be an important step towards developing AI systems that can truly understand and interact with the world in more human-like ways.
For example, the Player2Vec paper explored how language models can learn to model player behaviors in video games, which is related to the idea of developing internal representations of complex environments. Similarly, the Unveiling LLMs' Evolution of Latent Representations paper looked at how language models update their internal knowledge over time, which is relevant to understanding how they build up mental models of the world.
Technical Explanation
The researchers trained a language model to play chess by exposing it to a large dataset of chess games. They then analyzed the internal representations that the model developed to reason about the game, known as its "emergent world model".
By probing the model's latent variables - the unobserved factors that the model uses to describe the state of the chess game - the researchers were able to gain insights into how the model is estimating things like the positions and relationships of the chess pieces. This helps us understand the mechanisms underlying the model's decision-making process.
The researchers' analysis revealed that the language model was able to learn rich, structured representations of the chess game, including the locations of pieces on the board and the tactical relationships between them. This suggests that large language models have the capacity to build sophisticated mental models of complex environments, which could be leveraged for tasks beyond just language processing.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to our understanding of how language models can develop internal representations of complex environments. However, the research is limited to the specific domain of chess, and it's unclear how well the findings would generalize to other, more open-ended environments.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential limitations or biases of the language model's internal representations. It's possible that the model's understanding of the chess game is incomplete or skewed in ways that are not fully captured by the analysis.
Further research would be needed to better understand the broader implications of this work, such as how the insights could be applied to develop more capable and transparent AI systems that can reason about the world in a more human-like way. The Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models paper touched on some of these challenges, but there is still much to explore.
Conclusion
This paper provides an intriguing glimpse into the inner workings of chess-playing language models, revealing how they can develop sophisticated, structured representations of the game. By analyzing the latent variables that these models use to reason about chess, the researchers have gained insights that could be valuable for understanding the broader capabilities and limitations of large language models.
While the findings are limited to the specific domain of chess, they suggest that language models have the potential to build complex mental models of their environments, which could be leveraged for a wide range of applications beyond just language processing. Continued research in this area could lead to the development of more capable and transparent AI systems that can truly understand and interact with the world in a more human-like way.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language Models
Adam Karvonen
Language models have shown unprecedented capabilities, sparking debate over the source of their performance. Is it merely the outcome of learning syntactic patterns and surface level statistics, or do they extract semantics and a world model from the text? Prior work by Li et al. investigated this by training a GPT model on synthetic, randomly generated Othello games and found that the model learned an internal representation of the board state. We extend this work into the more complex domain of chess, training on real games and investigating our model's internal representations using linear probes and contrastive activations. The model is given no a priori knowledge of the game and is solely trained on next character prediction, yet we find evidence of internal representations of board state. We validate these internal representations by using them to make interventions on the model's activations and edit its internal board state. Unlike Li et al's prior synthetic dataset approach, our analysis finds that the model also learns to estimate latent variables like player skill to better predict the next character. We derive a player skill vector and add it to the model, improving the model's win rate by up to 2.6 times.
Read more7/16/2024
📈
2
Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Task
Kenneth Li, Aspen K. Hopkins, David Bau, Fernanda Vi'egas, Hanspeter Pfister, Martin Wattenberg
Language models show a surprising range of capabilities, but the source of their apparent competence is unclear. Do these networks just memorize a collection of surface statistics, or do they rely on internal representations of the process that generates the sequences they see? We investigate this question by applying a variant of the GPT model to the task of predicting legal moves in a simple board game, Othello. Although the network has no a priori knowledge of the game or its rules, we uncover evidence of an emergent nonlinear internal representation of the board state. Interventional experiments indicate this representation can be used to control the output of the network and create latent saliency maps that can help explain predictions in human terms.
Read more6/27/2024
82
Player-Driven Emergence in LLM-Driven Game Narrative
Xiangyu Peng, Jessica Quaye, Sudha Rao, Weijia Xu, Portia Botchway, Chris Brockett, Nebojsa Jojic, Gabriel DesGarennes, Ken Lobb, Michael Xu, Jorge Leandro, Claire Jin, Bill Dolan
We explore how interaction with large language models (LLMs) can give rise to emergent behaviors, empowering players to participate in the evolution of game narratives. Our testbed is a text-adventure game in which players attempt to solve a mystery under a fixed narrative premise, but can freely interact with non-player characters generated by GPT-4, a large language model. We recruit 28 gamers to play the game and use GPT-4 to automatically convert the game logs into a node-graph representing the narrative in the player's gameplay. We find that through their interactions with the non-deterministic behavior of the LLM, players are able to discover interesting new emergent nodes that were not a part of the original narrative but have potential for being fun and engaging. Players that created the most emergent nodes tended to be those that often enjoy games that facilitate discovery, exploration and experimentation.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Show, Don't Tell: Evaluating Large Language Models Beyond Textual Understanding with ChildPlay
Gonc{c}alo Hora de Carvalho, Oscar Knap, Robert Pollice
We explore the hypothesis that LLMs, such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, possess broader cognitive functions, particularly in non-linguistic domains. Our approach extends beyond standard linguistic benchmarks by incorporating games like Tic-Tac-Toe, Connect Four, and Battleship, encoded via ASCII, to assess strategic thinking and decision-making. To evaluate the models' ability to generalize beyond their training data, we introduce two additional games. The first game, LEGO Connect Language (LCL), tests the models' capacity to understand spatial logic and follow assembly instructions. The second game, the game of shapes, challenges the models to identify shapes represented by 1s within a matrix of zeros, further testing their spatial reasoning skills. This show, don't tell strategy uses games instead of simply querying the models. Our results show that despite their proficiency on standard benchmarks, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4's abilities to play and reason about fully observable games without pre-training is mediocre. Both models fail to anticipate losing moves in Tic-Tac-Toe and Connect Four, and they are unable to play Battleship correctly. While GPT-4 shows some success in the game of shapes, both models fail at the assembly tasks presented in the LCL game. These results suggest that while GPT models can emulate conversational proficiency and basic rule comprehension, their performance in strategic gameplay and spatial reasoning tasks is very limited. Importantly, this reveals a blind spot in current LLM benchmarks that we highlight with our gameplay benchmark suite ChildPlay (https://github.com/child-play-neurips/child-play). Our findings provide a cautionary tale about claims of emergent intelligence and reasoning capabilities of LLMs that are roughly the size of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
Read more8/20/2024