Unveiling LLMs: The Evolution of Latent Representations in a Temporal Knowledge Graph
2404.03623
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate an impressive capacity to recall a vast range of common factual knowledge information. However, unravelling the underlying reasoning of LLMs and explaining their internal mechanisms of exploiting this factual knowledge remain active areas of investigation. Our work analyzes the factual knowledge encoded in the latent representation of LLMs when prompted to assess the truthfulness of factual claims. We propose an end-to-end framework that jointly decodes the factual knowledge embedded in the latent space of LLMs from a vector space to a set of ground predicates and represents its evolution across the layers using a temporal knowledge graph. Our framework relies on the technique of activation patching which intervenes in the inference computation of a model by dynamically altering its latent representations. Consequently, we neither rely on external models nor training processes. We showcase our framework with local and global interpretability analyses using two claim verification datasets: FEVER and CLIMATE-FEVER. The local interpretability analysis exposes different latent errors from representation to multi-hop reasoning errors. On the other hand, the global analysis uncovered patterns in the underlying evolution of the model's factual knowledge (e.g., store-and-seek factual information). By enabling graph-based analyses of the latent representations, this work represents a step towards the mechanistic interpretability of LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the evolution of latent representations in large language models (LLMs) over time, using a temporal knowledge graph approach.
- The authors investigate how the internal representations of LLMs change as they are trained on more data, and how these changes relate to the models' performance on various tasks.
- The research provides insights into the inner workings of LLMs and how their knowledge and reasoning capabilities develop during the training process.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and BERT have become incredibly powerful at tasks like generating human-like text, answering questions, and even performing complex reasoning. However, the inner workings of these models can be difficult to understand. This paper aims to shed light on how the knowledge and capabilities of LLMs evolve as they are trained on more and more data.
The researchers used a technique called a "temporal knowledge graph" to track the changes in the latent representations (the internal encodings) of an LLM over time. This allowed them to see how the model's understanding of various concepts and their relationships developed as it learned from more examples.
By analyzing these changes, the authors were able to gain insights into how LLMs acquire and organize knowledge. For example, they found that the models first learn basic facts and relationships, and then gradually build more complex and nuanced understandings. The researchers also looked at how the models' performance on different tasks, like answering questions or solving problems, is related to the evolution of their internal representations.
Overall, this work provides a valuable window into the "black box" of large language models, helping us better understand how these powerful AI systems work and how they can be improved in the future. The findings could also have implications for how we use LLMs as assistants and how we evaluate their truthfulness and reasoning abilities.
Technical Explanation
The core of this research is the use of a temporal knowledge graph (TKG) to track the evolution of latent representations in a large language model (LLM) over the course of its training. A TKG is a data structure that represents entities (concepts) and the relationships between them, with the added dimension of time.
The authors trained an LLM on a large corpus of text data and periodically captured snapshots of the model's internal representations. They then used these snapshots to construct a TKG, with the entities representing the concepts learned by the model and the relationships representing how those concepts are connected.
By analyzing the changes in the TKG over time, the researchers were able to gain insights into how the LLM's understanding of the world evolves. For example, they observed that the model first learns basic facts and simple relationships, and then gradually builds more complex and nuanced knowledge as it is exposed to more data.
The authors also looked at how the changes in the LLM's latent representations relate to its performance on various tasks, such as question answering and problem-solving. They found that the evolution of the model's internal representations is closely tied to its ability to reason and solve problems.
Overall, this work provides a novel approach to understanding the inner workings of large language models, and could have important implications for how these models are used as cross-modal and cross-lingual assistants in the future.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to our understanding of large language models, but it also has some limitations and potential areas for further exploration.
One potential concern is the scope of the analysis, which is limited to a single LLM trained on a specific corpus of data. While the authors' findings provide important insights, it would be valuable to see if the same patterns hold true for other models and datasets. Expanding the research to a broader range of LLMs and domains could help validate the generalizability of the results.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or ethical considerations that may arise from the way LLMs acquire and organize knowledge. As these models become more prominent in various applications, it will be crucial to thoroughly investigate such issues and ensure that they are developed and deployed responsibly.
Further research could also explore the relationship between the evolution of latent representations and the models' capabilities in more detail. For example, the authors could investigate whether there are specific "tipping points" in the development of the LLM's internal representations that correspond to significant breakthroughs in its performance on different tasks.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in understanding the inner workings of large language models, but there is still much more work to be done in this area. Continued research and critical analysis will be essential for ensuring that these powerful AI systems are developed and used in ways that are beneficial to society.
Conclusion
This research paper provides a novel approach to studying the evolution of large language models (LLMs) by using a temporal knowledge graph to track changes in their internal representations over time. The findings offer valuable insights into how LLMs acquire and organize knowledge, and how these changes relate to the models' performance on various tasks.
The work has important implications for our understanding of these powerful AI systems, as well as their potential applications as assistants in a variety of domains. By shedding light on the "black box" of LLMs, this research could pave the way for more transparent and accountable development of these technologies, ensuring that they are used in ways that are beneficial to society.
While the paper presents a promising approach, it also highlights the need for further research to validate the findings across a wider range of models and datasets, and to explore the ethical considerations associated with the development and deployment of large language models. As these AI systems become increasingly influential, it will be crucial to maintain a critical and thoughtful perspective on their capabilities and limitations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
New!Large Language Model Enhanced Knowledge Representation Learning: A Survey
Xin Wang, Zirui Chen, Haofen Wang, Leong Hou U, Zhao Li, Wenbin Guo
0
0
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with Knowledge Representation Learning (KRL) signifies a pivotal advancement in the field of artificial intelligence, enhancing the ability to capture and utilize complex knowledge structures. This synergy leverages the advanced linguistic and contextual understanding capabilities of LLMs to improve the accuracy, adaptability, and efficacy of KRL, thereby expanding its applications and potential. Despite the increasing volume of research focused on embedding LLMs within the domain of knowledge representation, a thorough review that examines the fundamental components and processes of these enhanced models is conspicuously absent. Our survey addresses this by categorizing these models based on three distinct Transformer architectures, and by analyzing experimental data from various KRL downstream tasks to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Finally, we identify and explore potential future research directions in this emerging yet underexplored domain, proposing pathways for continued progress.
7/2/2024
Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning
Siheng Xiong, Ali Payani, Ramana Kompella, Faramarz Fekri
0
0
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, they are not without their flaws and inaccuracies. Recent studies have introduced various methods to mitigate these limitations. Temporal reasoning (TR), in particular, presents a significant challenge for LLMs due to its reliance on diverse temporal concepts and intricate temporal logic. In this paper, we propose TG-LLM, a novel framework towards language-based TR. Instead of reasoning over the original context, we adopt a latent representation, temporal graph (TG) that enhances the learning of TR. A synthetic dataset (TGQA), which is fully controllable and requires minimal supervision, is constructed for fine-tuning LLMs on this text-to-TG translation task. We confirmed in experiments that the capability of TG translation learned on our dataset can be transferred to other TR tasks and benchmarks. On top of that, we teach LLM to perform deliberate reasoning over the TGs via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) bootstrapping and graph data augmentation. We observed that those strategies, which maintain a balance between usefulness and diversity, bring more reliable CoTs and final results than the vanilla CoT distillation.
6/12/2024
š¬
Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspective
Haiyan Zhao, Fan Yang, Bo Shen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Mengnan Du
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have led to breakthroughs in language tasks, yet the internal mechanisms that enable their remarkable generalization and reasoning abilities remain opaque. This lack of transparency presents challenges such as hallucinations, toxicity, and misalignment with human values, hindering the safe and beneficial deployment of LLMs. This paper aims to uncover the mechanisms underlying LLM functionality through the lens of explainability. First, we review how knowledge is architecturally composed within LLMs and encoded in their internal parameters via mechanistic interpretability techniques. Then, we summarize how knowledge is embedded in LLM representations by leveraging probing techniques and representation engineering. Additionally, we investigate the training dynamics through a mechanistic perspective to explain phenomena such as grokking and memorization. Lastly, we explore how the insights gained from these explanations can enhance LLM performance through model editing, improve efficiency through pruning, and better align with human values.
4/17/2024
š¬
Can Large Language Models Create New Knowledge for Spatial Reasoning Tasks?
Thomas Greatrix, Roger Whitaker, Liam Turner, Walter Colombo
0
0
The potential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate new information offers a potential step change for research and innovation. This is challenging to assert as it can be difficult to determine what an LLM has previously seen during training, making newness difficult to substantiate. In this paper we observe that LLMs are able to perform sophisticated reasoning on problems with a spatial dimension, that they are unlikely to have previously directly encountered. While not perfect, this points to a significant level of understanding that state-of-the-art LLMs can now achieve, supporting the proposition that LLMs are able to yield significant emergent properties. In particular, Claude 3 is found to perform well in this regard.
5/24/2024