An Empirical Exploration of Trust Dynamics in LLM Supply Chains
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the dynamics of trust in the supply chain for large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers conducted an empirical study to understand how trust evolves between humans and AI systems, particularly in the context of AI-powered supply chain management.
- The study examines factors that influence trust, how trust changes over time, and the implications for human-AI collaboration and the deployment of AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper investigates the issue of trust between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, specifically in the context of supply chains that rely on large language models (LLMs). LLMs are a type of AI that can process and generate human-like text. The researchers wanted to understand how trust develops and changes over time as humans interact with these AI systems in the supply chain.
The researchers conducted a study to explore the factors that influence trust in this human-AI collaboration. They looked at how trust evolves as people use and depend on the AI systems for tasks like planning, decision-making, and problem-solving in the supply chain. The goal was to understand the dynamics of trust and the implications for effectively deploying AI systems in real-world applications.
By examining this issue, the researchers hope to provide insights that can help organizations and developers build AI systems that are more trustworthy and that foster better collaboration between humans and AI. This is an important area of research as AI becomes more prevalent in various industries and domains.
Technical Explanation
The researchers designed an empirical study to investigate trust dynamics in the context of LLM-powered supply chain management. They recruited participants to interact with a simulated supply chain system that incorporated an LLM-based decision support tool. Over multiple sessions, the participants completed supply chain tasks while providing feedback on their trust in the AI system.
The study examined how factors like the system's performance, transparency, and the participants' own expertise influenced their trust in the AI. The researchers also looked at how trust changed over time as the participants gained more experience with the system.
The results showed that trust was initially high but could decline if the AI system made mistakes or failed to meet the users' expectations. Transparency around the AI's capabilities and decision-making processes helped maintain trust. The participants' own domain knowledge and prior experience also played a role in shaping their trust in the AI system.
The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the design and deployment of AI-powered supply chain management systems. The researchers highlight the importance of fostering trust through thoughtful system design, clear communication, and ongoing user education and support.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the complex issue of trust in human-AI collaboration, particularly in the supply chain context. By taking an empirical approach and studying trust dynamics over time, the researchers offer a nuanced understanding of the factors that influence trust and how it can evolve.
One limitation of the study is that it was conducted in a simulated environment, which may not fully capture the real-world complexities and challenges of deploying AI systems in supply chain operations. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that further research in actual industrial settings would be beneficial.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of AI-powered supply chain management or the potential societal impacts. As AI becomes more pervasive in business and industry, it will be important to consider these broader issues as well.
Overall, this research contributes to the growing body of work on trust in AI progress, challenges, and future directions and collaborative human-AI trust processes. It highlights the need for a more holistic understanding of how framing uncertainty impacts longitudinal trust and the complex stakeholder perceptions and needs in the deployment of AI systems.
Conclusion
This empirical study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of trust between humans and AI systems, particularly in the context of supply chain management powered by large language models. The researchers found that trust is a complex and evolving phenomenon, influenced by factors such as system performance, transparency, and user expertise.
The findings have important implications for the design and deployment of AI-powered supply chain management systems, as well as the broader challenge of fostering effective human-AI collaboration and trust. By understanding the nuances of trust in these contexts, organizations can work to build AI systems that are more trustworthy and that enhance rather than replace human decision-making and problem-solving capabilities.
This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by the increasing integration of AI into various domains and industries. As the use of AI becomes more widespread, it will be crucial to continue exploring the complex social and ethical implications of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An Empirical Exploration of Trust Dynamics in LLM Supply Chains
Agathe Balayn, Mireia Yurrita, Fanny Rancourt, Fabio Casati, Ujwal Gadiraju
With the widespread proliferation of AI systems, trust in AI is an important and timely topic to navigate. Researchers so far have largely employed a myopic view of this relationship. In particular, a limited number of relevant trustors (e.g., end-users) and trustees (i.e., AI systems) have been considered, and empirical explorations have remained in laboratory settings, potentially overlooking factors that impact human-AI relationships in the real world. In this paper, we argue for broadening the scope of studies addressing `trust in AI' by accounting for the complex and dynamic supply chains that AI systems result from. AI supply chains entail various technical artifacts that diverse individuals, organizations, and stakeholders interact with, in a variety of ways. We present insights from an in-situ, empirical study of LLM supply chains. Our work reveals additional types of trustors and trustees and new factors impacting their trust relationships. These relationships were found to be central to the development and adoption of LLMs, but they can also be the terrain for uncalibrated trust and reliance on untrustworthy LLMs. Based on these findings, we discuss the implications for research on `trust in AI'. We highlight new research opportunities and challenges concerning the appropriate study of inter-actor relationships across the supply chain and the development of calibrated trust and meaningful reliance behaviors. We also question the meaning of building trust in the LLM supply chain.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Towards Trustworthy AI: A Review of Ethical and Robust Large Language Models
Md Meftahul Ferdaus, Mahdi Abdelguerfi, Elias Ioup, Kendall N. Niles, Ken Pathak, Steven Sloan
The rapid progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) could transform many fields, but their fast development creates significant challenges for oversight, ethical creation, and building user trust. This comprehensive review looks at key trust issues in LLMs, such as unintended harms, lack of transparency, vulnerability to attacks, alignment with human values, and environmental impact. Many obstacles can undermine user trust, including societal biases, opaque decision-making, potential for misuse, and the challenges of rapidly evolving technology. Addressing these trust gaps is critical as LLMs become more common in sensitive areas like finance, healthcare, education, and policy. To tackle these issues, we suggest combining ethical oversight, industry accountability, regulation, and public involvement. AI development norms should be reshaped, incentives aligned, and ethics integrated throughout the machine learning process, which requires close collaboration across technology, ethics, law, policy, and other fields. Our review contributes a robust framework to assess trust in LLMs and analyzes the complex trust dynamics in depth. We provide contextualized guidelines and standards for responsibly developing and deploying these powerful AI systems. This review identifies key limitations and challenges in creating trustworthy AI. By addressing these issues, we aim to build a transparent, accountable AI ecosystem that benefits society while minimizing risks. Our findings provide valuable guidance for researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders striving to establish trust in LLMs and ensure they are used responsibly across various applications for the good of society.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Understanding Stakeholders' Perceptions and Needs Across the LLM Supply Chain
Agathe Balayn, Lorenzo Corti, Fanny Rancourt, Fabio Casati, Ujwal Gadiraju
Explainability and transparency of AI systems are undeniably important, leading to several research studies and tools addressing them. Existing works fall short of accounting for the diverse stakeholders of the AI supply chain who may differ in their needs and consideration of the facets of explainability and transparency. In this paper, we argue for the need to revisit the inquiries of these vital constructs in the context of LLMs. To this end, we report on a qualitative study with 71 different stakeholders, where we explore the prevalent perceptions and needs around these concepts. This study not only confirms the importance of exploring the ``who'' in XAI and transparency for LLMs, but also reflects on best practices to do so while surfacing the often forgotten stakeholders and their information needs. Our insights suggest that researchers and practitioners should simultaneously clarify the ``who'' in considerations of explainability and transparency, the ``what'' in the information needs, and ``why'' they are needed to ensure responsible design and development across the LLM supply chain.
Read more5/28/2024
🎲
0
Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Saleh Afroogh, Ali Akbari, Evan Malone, Mohammadali Kargar, Hananeh Alambeigi
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life through various applications, services, and products explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective. AI-driven systems (as opposed to other technologies) have ubiquitously diffused in our life not only as some beneficial tools to be used by human agents but also are going to be substitutive agents on our behalf, or manipulative minds that would influence human thought, decision, and agency. Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion, as trust can increase, and distrust may reduce the rate of adoption of AI. Recently, varieties of studies have paid attention to the variant dimension of trust/distrust in AI, and its relevant considerations. In this systematic literature review, after conceptualization of trust in the current AI literature review, we will investigate trust in different types of human-Machine interaction, and its impact on technology acceptance in different domains. In addition to that, we propose a taxonomy of technical (i.e., safety, accuracy, robustness) and non-technical axiological (i.e., ethical, legal, and mixed) trustworthiness metrics, and some trustworthy measurements. Moreover, we examine some major trust-breakers in AI (e.g., autonomy and dignity threat), and trust makers; and propose some future directions and probable solutions for the transition to a trustworthy AI.
Read more4/5/2024