Empirical research methods for human-computer interaction

Read original: arXiv:2404.13319 - Published 4/23/2024 by I. Scott MacKenzie, Janet C. Read, Matthew Horton
Total Score

0

Empirical research methods for human-computer interaction

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Provides an overview of empirical research methods for human-computer interaction (HCI)
  • Covers the benefits, intended audience, prerequisites, and key elements of conducting empirical research in HCI
  • Discusses the process of writing a research paper for the CHI (Computer-Human Interaction) conference

Plain English Explanation

This blog post serves as a primer on empirical research methods for human-computer interaction (HCI). Empirical research involves collecting and analyzing data from real-world observations or experiments to draw conclusions about how people interact with technology.

The paper explains the benefits of conducting this type of research, which include gaining a better understanding of user needs, validating design decisions, and generating insights that can improve the user experience. The intended audience includes HCI researchers, designers, and developers who want to incorporate empirical methods into their work.

Before diving into the research process, the paper outlines some key prerequisites, such as having a good understanding of research design, statistical analysis, and research ethics. It then walks through the essential elements of an empirical HCI study, including formulating research questions, choosing appropriate methods, recruiting participants, and analyzing the data.

The latter part of the paper focuses on the process of writing up the research for publication, particularly in the format required for the prestigious CHI conference. This includes guidance on structuring the paper, presenting the findings, and discussing the implications and limitations of the study.

Throughout the post, the authors use plain language and provide examples to make the concepts accessible to a general audience. By the end, readers should have a solid grasp of the value and mechanics of empirical research in the field of human-computer interaction.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines a comprehensive overview of empirical research methods for human-computer interaction (HCI). Empirical research in HCI involves collecting and analyzing data from real-world observations or controlled experiments to gain insights into how people interact with technology.

The authors first discuss the key benefits of conducting empirical research in HCI, which include:

  1. Gaining a deeper understanding of user needs, behaviors, and pain points
  2. Validating design decisions and iterating on prototypes
  3. Generating insights that can lead to more effective and user-friendly technologies

The paper then identifies the intended audience for this guidance, which includes HCI researchers, designers, and developers who want to incorporate empirical methods into their work.

Before delving into the research process, the authors outline several important prerequisites, such as:

  • Understanding research design principles (e.g., experimental methods, sampling techniques, measurement)
  • Familiarity with statistical analysis and data interpretation
  • Knowledge of research ethics and best practices for working with human participants

The core of the paper walks through the essential elements of an empirical HCI study, including:

  • Formulating clear research questions or hypotheses
  • Selecting appropriate data collection methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, usability testing)
  • Recruiting a representative sample of participants
  • Analyzing the collected data using statistical or qualitative techniques
  • Interpreting the findings and discussing their implications

The final sections of the paper focus on the process of writing up the research for publication, particularly in the format required for the prestigious CHI (Computer-Human Interaction) conference. This includes guidance on structuring the paper, presenting the methodology and results, and discussing the limitations and future research directions.

Throughout the paper, the authors provide clear explanations, relevant examples, and key takeaways to help readers understand and apply the concepts of empirical research in the field of human-computer interaction.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured overview of empirical research methods for human-computer interaction (HCI), covering the key elements of the research process in a thorough and accessible manner. The authors' focus on making the content accessible to a general audience is commendable, as it helps to bridge the gap between technical research and practical application.

One potential area for improvement is the depth of discussion around research ethics and considerations for working with human participants. While the paper briefly mentions the importance of this topic, it could delve further into the ethical guidelines, privacy concerns, and best practices for conducting HCI studies in an responsible and participant-centric manner. This paper on human participants in AI research provides a more in-depth exploration of these crucial issues.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from more specific examples or case studies to illustrate the application of the presented concepts. For instance, the authors could showcase how certain empirical methods have been employed in prior HCI studies, such as the systematic review of "sinestesia" as an HCI model or the exploration of human-LLM interaction patterns. This would help readers better contextualize the research methods and understand their practical implications.

Overall, the paper is a valuable resource for HCI researchers, designers, and developers who are interested in incorporating empirical methods into their work. By encouraging critical thinking and providing a solid foundation in research principles, the authors equip readers with the knowledge and tools needed to conduct rigorous and impactful studies in the field of human-computer interaction.

Conclusion

This blog post provides a comprehensive overview of empirical research methods for human-computer interaction (HCI), covering the benefits, intended audience, prerequisites, and key elements of conducting this type of research. The authors present the material in a clear and accessible manner, making it a valuable resource for HCI researchers, designers, and developers who want to incorporate empirical methods into their work.

By understanding the principles of research design, data collection, and analysis, readers can learn how to generate insights that can inform the development of more user-centric technologies. The guidance on writing up research for publication, particularly for the prestigious CHI conference, further equips readers with the skills needed to effectively communicate their findings and contribute to the broader HCI community.

While the paper could be strengthened by a deeper exploration of research ethics and more concrete examples, it nonetheless serves as a solid foundation for those interested in applying empirical methods to their HCI work. By encouraging critical thinking and a focus on user needs, this post can help drive innovation and improve the overall user experience in a wide range of technology-driven domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Empirical research methods for human-computer interaction
Total Score

0

Empirical research methods for human-computer interaction

I. Scott MacKenzie, Janet C. Read, Matthew Horton

Most attendees at CHI conferences will agree that an experiment (user study) is the hallmark of good research in human-computer interaction. But what constitutes an experiment? And how does one go from an experiment to a CHI paper? This course will teach how to pose testable research questions, how to make and measure observations, and how to design and conduct an experiment. Specifically, attendees will participate in a real experiment to gain experience as both an investigator and as a participant. The second session covers the statistical tools typically used to analyze data. Most notably, attendees will learn how to organize experiment results and write a CHI paper.

Read more

4/23/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

H is for Human and How (Not) To Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI

Andy Crabtree

Concern has recently been expressed by HCI researchers as to the inappropriate treatment of qualitative studies through a positivistic mode of evaluation that places emphasis on metrics and measurement. This contrasts with the nature of qualitative research, which privileges interpretation and understanding over quantification. This paper explains the difference between positivism and interpretivism, the limits of quantification in human science, the distinctive contribution of qualitative research, and how quality assurance might be provided for in the absence of numbers via five basic criteria that reviewers may use to evaluate qualitative studies on their own terms.

Read more

9/4/2024

Past, Present, and Future of Citation Practices in HCI
Total Score

0

Past, Present, and Future of Citation Practices in HCI

Jonas Oppenlaender

Science is a complex system comprised of many scientists who individually make collective decisions that, due to the size and nature of the academic system, largely do not affect the system as a whole. However, certain decisions at the meso-level of research communities, such as the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) community, may result in deep and long-lasting behavioral changes in scientists. In this article, we provide evidence on how a change in editorial policies introduced at the ACM CHI Conference in 2016 launched the CHI community on an expansive path, denoted by a year-by-year increase in the mean number of references included in CHI articles. If this near-linear trend continues undisrupted, an article in CHI 2030 will include on average almost 130 references. The trend towards more citations reflects a citation culture where quantity is prioritized over quality, contributing to both author and peer reviewer fatigue. This article underscores the profound impact that meso-level policy adjustments have on the evolution of scientific fields and disciplines, urging stakeholders to carefully consider the broader implications of such changes.

Read more

9/11/2024

Design Principles for Falsifiable, Replicable and Reproducible Empirical ML Research
Total Score

0

Design Principles for Falsifiable, Replicable and Reproducible Empirical ML Research

Daniel Vranjev{s}, Oliver Niggemann

Empirical research plays a fundamental role in the machine learning domain. At the heart of impactful empirical research lies the development of clear research hypotheses, which then shape the design of experiments. The execution of experiments must be carried out with precision to ensure reliable results, followed by statistical analysis to interpret these outcomes. This process is key to either supporting or refuting initial hypotheses. Despite its importance, there is a high variability in research practices across the machine learning community and no uniform understanding of quality criteria for empirical research. To address this gap, we propose a model for the empirical research process, accompanied by guidelines to uphold the validity of empirical research. By embracing these recommendations, greater consistency, enhanced reliability and increased impact can be achieved.

Read more

5/29/2024