Encouraging Responsible Use of Generative AI in Education: A Reward-Based Learning Approach

Read original: arXiv:2407.15022 - Published 7/23/2024 by Aditi Singh, Abul Ehtesham, Saket Kumar, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, Tala Talaei Khoei
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces an innovative mathematical learning approach that integrates generative AI to foster structured learning rather than quick solutions.
  • The method combines chatbot capabilities and generative AI to offer interactive problem-solving exercises, enhancing learning through a step-by-step approach for varied problems.
  • The approach aims to encourage responsible use of AI in education, highlighting how immediate answers from ChatGPT can impede real learning.
  • A reward-based system is introduced that requires students to solve mathematical problems effectively to receive the final answer, promoting a progressive learning path from basic to complex problems.
  • The goal is to transition students from seeking quick fixes to engaging actively in a comprehensive learning experience.

Plain English Explanation

The paper proposes a new way of using generative AI in mathematical education. Instead of providing students with immediate answers, the approach encourages them to actively engage in solving problems step-by-step.

The system combines chatbot capabilities and generative AI to present interactive exercises. Students must work through the problems effectively to receive the final solution as a reward. This encourages a progressive learning path, where students start with basic problems and gradually build up to more complex ones.

The key idea is to shift students away from seeking quick fixes, like using ChatGPT to get answers, and instead get them to fully participate in the learning process. The authors believe this will lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, rather than just memorizing solutions.

By integrating generative AI in this structured way, the approach aims to promote the responsible use of AI in education, where the technology enhances learning rather than replacing it.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel mathematical learning approach that integrates generative AI to foster a structured learning experience rather than quick solutions.

The core of the method is a system that combines chatbot capabilities and generative AI to offer interactive problem-solving exercises. These exercises guide students through a step-by-step process of solving varied mathematical problems, rather than simply providing the final answer.

A key aspect of the approach is a reward-based mechanism. Students must effectively solve the problems to receive the final solution as a reward. This encourages a progressive learning path, where students start with basic problems and gradually advance to more complex ones, demonstrating mastery along the way.

The authors argue that this approach helps address the potential pitfalls of tools like ChatGPT in education, where immediate answers can impede genuine learning. By requiring students to actively engage in problem-solving, the method aims to transition them from seeking quick fixes to embracing a comprehensive learning experience.

Overall, the paper introduces a novel framework for integrating generative AI into adaptive learning environments, with the goal of promoting the responsible development and use of these technologies in educational settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful approach to incorporating generative AI into mathematical education, addressing the valid concern that tools like ChatGPT can enable students to bypass the learning process. The proposed reward-based system, which requires students to actively solve problems to receive solutions, is a compelling mechanism to encourage deeper engagement and mastery of the subject matter.

However, the paper does not provide detailed information about the specific implementation or evaluation of the approach. It would be helpful to understand how the interactive exercises are designed, how the step-by-step guidance is provided, and what metrics are used to assess the effectiveness of the system in improving student learning outcomes.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential challenges or limitations of the approach, such as the additional time and effort required from students, or the potential for the system to become overly prescriptive and stifle creativity. Exploring these aspects could strengthen the critical analysis and provide a more well-rounded understanding of the proposed method.

Despite these minor limitations, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the evolving landscape of learning with generative AI. The emphasis on responsible development and use of these technologies in education is commendable and aligns with the growing need to ensure AI-powered tools enhance, rather than replace, meaningful learning experiences.

Conclusion

This paper introduces an innovative mathematical learning approach that integrates generative AI to cultivate a structured learning experience, in contrast with the quick solutions often provided by tools like ChatGPT. The core of the method is a reward-based system that requires students to actively solve problems step-by-step, gradually building their mastery from basic to complex concepts.

By combining chatbot capabilities and generative AI, the approach aims to promote the responsible use of these technologies in education, where the focus is on enhancing learning rather than replacing it. The goal is to transition students from seeking quick fixes to engaging deeply in the learning process, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of mathematical concepts.

While the paper could benefit from additional details on implementation and evaluation, the proposed framework represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing exploration of how generative AI can transform educational practices. As AI technologies continue to evolve, this type of thoughtful approach to integrating them into learning environments will be crucial in shaping the future of education.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Encouraging Responsible Use of Generative AI in Education: A Reward-Based Learning Approach

Aditi Singh, Abul Ehtesham, Saket Kumar, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, Tala Talaei Khoei

This research introduces an innovative mathematical learning approach that integrates generative AI to cultivate a structured learning rather than quick solution. Our method combines chatbot capabilities and generative AI to offer interactive problem-solving exercises, enhancing learning through a stepby-step approach for varied problems, advocating for the responsible use of AI in education. Our approach emphasizes that immediate answers from ChatGPT can impede real learning. We introduce a reward-based system that requires students to solve mathematical problems effectively to receive the final answer. This encourages a progressive learning path from basic to complex problems, rewarding mastery with final solutions. The goal is to transition students from seeking quick fixes to engaging actively in a comprehensive learning experience.

Read more

7/23/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Towards Responsible Development of Generative AI for Education: An Evaluation-Driven Approach

Irina Jurenka, Markus Kunesch, Kevin R. McKee, Daniel Gillick, Shaojian Zhu, Sara Wiltberger, Shubham Milind Phal, Katherine Hermann, Daniel Kasenberg, Avishkar Bhoopchand, Ankit Anand, Miruna P^islar, Stephanie Chan, Lisa Wang, Jennifer She, Parsa Mahmoudieh, Aliya Rysbek, Wei-Jen Ko, Andrea Huber, Brett Wiltshire, Gal Elidan, Roni Rabin, Jasmin Rubinovitz, Amit Pitaru, Mac McAllister, Julia Wilkowski, David Choi, Roee Engelberg, Lidan Hackmon, Adva Levin, Rachel Griffin, Michael Sears, Filip Bar, Mia Mesar, Mana Jabbour, Arslan Chaudhry, James Cohan, Sridhar Thiagarajan, Nir Levine, Ben Brown, Dilan Gorur, Svetlana Grant, Rachel Hashimshoni, Laura Weidinger, Jieru Hu, Dawn Chen, Kuba Dolecki, Canfer Akbulut, Maxwell Bileschi, Laura Culp, Wen-Xin Dong, Nahema Marchal, Kelsie Van Deman, Hema Bajaj Misra, Michael Duah, Moran Ambar, Avi Caciularu, Sandra Lefdal, Chris Summerfield, James An, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Abhinit Mohdi, Theofilos Strinopoulous, Annie Hale, Wayne Anderson, Luis C. Cobo, Niv Efron, Muktha Ananda, Shakir Mohamed, Maureen Heymans, Zoubin Ghahramani, Yossi Matias, Ben Gomes, Lila Ibrahim

A major challenge facing the world is the provision of equitable and universal access to quality education. Recent advances in generative AI (gen AI) have created excitement about the potential of new technologies to offer a personal tutor for every learner and a teaching assistant for every teacher. The full extent of this dream, however, has not yet materialised. We argue that this is primarily due to the difficulties with verbalising pedagogical intuitions into gen AI prompts and the lack of good evaluation practices, reinforced by the challenges in defining excellent pedagogy. Here we present our work collaborating with learners and educators to translate high level principles from learning science into a pragmatic set of seven diverse educational benchmarks, spanning quantitative, qualitative, automatic and human evaluations; and to develop a new set of fine-tuning datasets to improve the pedagogical capabilities of Gemini, introducing LearnLM-Tutor. Our evaluations show that LearnLM-Tutor is consistently preferred over a prompt tuned Gemini by educators and learners on a number of pedagogical dimensions. We hope that this work can serve as a first step towards developing a comprehensive educational evaluation framework, and that this can enable rapid progress within the AI and EdTech communities towards maximising the positive impact of gen AI in education.

Read more

7/22/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Generative AI: The power of the new education

Sergio Altares-L'opez, Jos'e M. Bengochea-Guevara, Carlos Ranz, H'ector Montes, Angela Ribeiro

The effective integration of generative artificial intelligence in education is a fundamental aspect to prepare future generations. The objective of this study is to analyze from a quantitative and qualitative point of view the perception of controlled student-IA interaction within the classroom. This analysis includes assessing the ethical implications and everyday use of AI tools, as well as understanding whether AI tools encourage students to pursue STEM careers. Several points for improvement in education are found, such as the challenge of getting teachers to engage with new technologies and adapt their methods in all subjects, not just those related to technologies.

Read more

9/4/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Creatively in the Classroom: Examples and Lessons Learned

Maria J. Molina, Amy McGovern, Jhayron S. Perez-Carrasquilla, Robin L. Tanamachi

Although generative artificial intelligence (AI) is not new, recent technological breakthroughs have transformed its capabilities across many domains. These changes necessitate new attention from educators and specialized training within the atmospheric sciences and related fields. Enabling students to use generative AI effectively, responsibly, and ethically is critically important for their academic and professional preparation. Educators can also use generative AI to create engaging classroom activities, such as active learning modules and games, but must be aware of potential pitfalls and biases. There are also ethical implications in using tools that lack transparency, as well as equity concerns for students who lack access to more sophisticated paid versions of generative AI tools. This article is written for students and educators alike, particularly those who want to learn more about generative AI in education, including use cases, ethical concerns, and a brief history of its emergence. Sample user prompts are also provided across numerous applications in education and the atmospheric and related sciences. While we don't have solutions for some broader ethical concerns surrounding the use of generative AI in education, our goal is to start a conversation that could galvanize the education community around shared goals and values.

Read more

9/10/2024