The Energy Cost of Artificial Intelligence of Things Lifecycle

Read original: arXiv:2408.00540 - Published 8/2/2024 by Shih-Kai Chou, Jernej Hribar, Mihael Mohorv{c}iv{c}, Carolina Fortuna
Total Score

0

The Energy Cost of Artificial Intelligence of Things Lifecycle

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the energy consumption of the entire lifecycle of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) systems
  • Analyzes the energy costs associated with different stages of the AIoT lifecycle, including data collection, model training, deployment, and inference
  • Provides insights into strategies for reducing the energy footprint of AIoT systems

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the energy impact of the full lifecycle of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) systems. AIoT refers to the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technology with internet-connected devices, such as smart home appliances or industrial sensors. The researchers looked at the energy costs at each stage of the AIoT process, from gathering data to training machine learning models, deploying those models, and using them to make inferences or predictions.

The key insight is that the energy consumption of an AIoT system goes beyond just the energy used by the AI models themselves. There are significant energy costs associated with collecting and preprocessing the data that feeds into the models, as well as the energy required to transmit that data and deploy the models on edge devices. The researchers provide strategies for reducing the energy footprint at each stage of the AIoT lifecycle, which could help make these systems more sustainable and environmentally friendly.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the energy cost of the Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) lifecycle. The researchers examined the energy consumption at different stages of the AIoT pipeline, including data collection, model training, model deployment, and model inference.

The authors developed an experimental testbed to measure the energy consumption of various AIoT components and workloads. They found that the energy costs associated with data collection and preprocessing can be significant, often outweighing the energy used for model training and inference. The researchers also explored the impact of model complexity and scale on energy consumption, identifying strategies for building more energy-efficient AIoT systems.

The findings suggest that a holistic approach to managing the energy footprint of AIoT is necessary, focusing not only on optimizing the AI models themselves but also on the entire lifecycle of AIoT systems. The paper provides a detailed roadmap for reducing the energy consumption of AIoT, which could have significant implications for the sustainability of these technologies.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed study of the energy costs associated with the AIoT lifecycle. The experimental testbed and methodologies used appear to be robust and well-executed, allowing the researchers to gain valuable insights into the energy consumption at different stages of the AIoT pipeline.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on the energy consumption of the AIoT system itself, without considering the broader environmental impact of the hardware and infrastructure required to support these systems. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the tradeoffs between energy efficiency and other performance metrics, such as model accuracy or latency, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployments.

Despite these minor limitations, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on the environmental impact of AI and IoT technologies. The insights and strategies presented in the paper could be highly relevant for practitioners and policymakers working to develop more sustainable and energy-efficient AIoT solutions.

Conclusion

This paper offers a detailed examination of the energy consumption associated with the entire lifecycle of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) systems. The researchers provide a comprehensive analysis of the energy costs at each stage of the AIoT pipeline, from data collection to model inference, and offer strategies for reducing the overall energy footprint of these systems.

The findings suggest that a holistic approach to managing the energy consumption of AIoT is crucial, as the energy costs extend beyond just the AI models themselves. The insights presented in this paper could have significant implications for the development of more sustainable and environmentally friendly AIoT technologies, which will be increasingly important as these systems become more widespread.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

The Energy Cost of Artificial Intelligence of Things Lifecycle
Total Score

0

The Energy Cost of Artificial Intelligence of Things Lifecycle

Shih-Kai Chou, Jernej Hribar, Mihael Mohorv{c}iv{c}, Carolina Fortuna

Artificial intelligence (AI)coupled with existing Internet of Things (IoT) enables more streamlined and autonomous operations across various economic sectors. Consequently, the paradigm of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) having AI techniques at its core implies additional energy and carbon costs that may become significant with more complex neural architectures. To better understand the energy and Carbon Footprint (CF) of some AIoT components, very recent studies employ conventional metrics. However, these metrics are not designed to capture energy efficiency aspects of inference. In this paper, we propose a new metric, the Energy Cost of AIoT Lifecycle (eCAL) to capture the overall energy cost of inference over the lifecycle of an AIoT system. We devise a new methodology for determining eCAL of an AIoT system by analyzing the complexity of data manipulation in individual components involved in the AIoT lifecycle and derive the overall and per bit energy consumption. With eCAL we show that the better a model is and the more it is used, the more energy efficient an inference is. For an example AIoT configuration, eCAL for making $100$ inferences is $1.43$ times higher than for $1000$ inferences. We also evaluate the CF of the AIoT system by calculating the equivalent CO$_{2}$ emissions based on the energy consumption and the Carbon Intensity (CI) across different countries. Using 2023 renewable data, our analysis reveals that deploying an AIoT system in Germany results in emitting $4.62$ times higher CO$_2$ than in Finland, due to latter using more low-CI energy sources.

Read more

8/2/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Generative AI for Low-Carbon Artificial Intelligence of Things

Jinbo Wen, Ruichen Zhang, Dusit Niyato, Jiawen Kang, Hongyang Du, Yang Zhang, Zhu Han

By integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) has revolutionized many fields. However, AIoT is facing the challenges of energy consumption and carbon emissions due to the continuous advancement of mobile technology. Fortunately, Generative AI (GAI) holds immense potential to reduce carbon emissions of AIoT due to its excellent reasoning and generation capabilities. In this article, we explore the potential of GAI for carbon emissions reduction and propose a novel GAI-enabled solution for low-carbon AIoT. Specifically, we first study the main impacts that cause carbon emissions in AIoT, and then introduce GAI techniques and their relations to carbon emissions. We then explore the application prospects of GAI in low-carbon AIoT, focusing on how GAI can reduce carbon emissions of network components. Subsequently, we propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled carbon emission optimization framework, in which we design pluggable LLM and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) modules to generate more accurate and reliable optimization problems. Furthermore, we utilize Generative Diffusion Models (GDMs) to identify optimal strategies for carbon emission reduction. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Finally, we insightfully provide open research directions for low-carbon AIoT.

Read more

7/18/2024

IoTCO2: Assessing the End-To-End Carbon Footprint of Internet-of-Things-Enabled Deep Learning
Total Score

0

IoTCO2: Assessing the End-To-End Carbon Footprint of Internet-of-Things-Enabled Deep Learning

Fan Chen, Shahzeen Attari, Gayle Buck, Lei Jiang

To improve privacy and ensure quality-of-service (QoS), deep learning (DL) models are increasingly deployed on Internet of Things (IoT) devices for data processing, significantly increasing the carbon footprint associated with DL on IoT, covering both operational and embodied aspects. Existing operational energy predictors often overlook quantized DL models and emerging neural processing units (NPUs), while embodied carbon footprint modeling tools neglect non-computing hardware components common in IoT devices, creating a gap in accurate carbon footprint modeling tools for IoT-enabled DL. This paper introduces textit{carb}, an end-to-end tool for precise carbon footprint estimation in IoT-enabled DL, with deviations as low as 5% for operational and 3.23% for embodied carbon footprints compared to actual measurements across various DL models. Additionally, practical applications of carb~are showcased through multiple user case studies.

Read more

9/16/2024

Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainably
Total Score

0

Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainably

Carole-Jean Wu, Bilge Acun, Ramya Raghavendra, Kim Hazelwood

Barroso's seminal contributions in energy-proportional warehouse-scale computing launched an era where modern datacenters have become more energy efficient and cost effective than ever before. At the same time, modern AI applications have driven ever-increasing demands in computing, highlighting the importance of optimizing efficiency across the entire deep learning model development cycle. This paper characterizes the carbon impact of AI, including both operational carbon emissions from training and inference as well as embodied carbon emissions from datacenter construction and hardware manufacturing. We highlight key efficiency optimization opportunities for cutting-edge AI technologies, from deep learning recommendation models to multi-modal generative AI tasks. To scale AI sustainably, we must also go beyond efficiency and optimize across the life cycle of computing infrastructures, from hardware manufacturing to datacenter operations and end-of-life processing for the hardware.

Read more

6/26/2024