Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainably
2406.05303
0
0
Abstract
Barroso's seminal contributions in energy-proportional warehouse-scale computing launched an era where modern datacenters have become more energy efficient and cost effective than ever before. At the same time, modern AI applications have driven ever-increasing demands in computing, highlighting the importance of optimizing efficiency across the entire deep learning model development cycle. This paper characterizes the carbon impact of AI, including both operational carbon emissions from training and inference as well as embodied carbon emissions from datacenter construction and hardware manufacturing. We highlight key efficiency optimization opportunities for cutting-edge AI technologies, from deep learning recommendation models to multi-modal generative AI tasks. To scale AI sustainably, we must also go beyond efficiency and optimize across the life cycle of computing infrastructures, from hardware manufacturing to datacenter operations and end-of-life processing for the hardware.
Create account to get full access
From Warehouse Scale Computing to AI
The paper explores the shift from traditional warehouse-scale computing towards the rapidly growing field of artificial intelligence (AI). As AI systems become more powerful and widespread, they are consuming an increasing amount of energy and resources, leading to growing concerns about their environmental impact.
The authors highlight the need to move beyond a narrow focus on improving the efficiency of AI systems and instead adopt a more holistic approach that considers the broader sustainability implications. They argue that simply making AI systems more efficient is not enough and that a more comprehensive assessment of the carbon footprint and environmental impact of AI is necessary.
Understanding the Carbon Impact of AI
The paper delves into the factors that contribute to the carbon impact of AI, including the energy-intensive nature of training large language models and the geographical distribution of AI infrastructure. The authors present research on the power-hungry processing required for AI, as well as the comprehensive assessment of AI's environmental impact.
The paper highlights the need to consider the entire life cycle of AI systems, from the energy used in training to the ongoing energy consumption of deployment and inference. It also emphasizes the importance of understanding the geographical distribution of AI infrastructure and the impact on local energy grids and communities.
Scaling AI Sustainably
The paper explores strategies for scaling AI in a more sustainable manner, including reducing barriers to entry for foundation model training and rethinking the approach to AI power use. The authors suggest that a more geographically distributed approach to AI infrastructure, as outlined in the paper on environmentally equitable AI, could help mitigate the environmental impact.
The paper emphasizes the need for a holistic and sustainable approach to AI development and deployment, going beyond simply improving efficiency and considering the broader societal and environmental implications.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the limitations of the current research and the need for further investigation. It highlights the complexity of accurately measuring the carbon footprint of AI systems and the challenges in accounting for the entire life cycle and geographical distribution of infrastructure.
The authors also recognize the potential trade-offs between the performance and sustainability of AI systems, and the need to find a balance that meets both technical and environmental goals.
Conclusion
The paper underscores the growing importance of addressing the environmental impact of AI as the technology continues to advance and become more pervasive. It calls for a paradigm shift in how we approach the development and deployment of AI, moving beyond a narrow focus on efficiency and embracing a more comprehensive and sustainable approach.
By considering the broader implications of AI, the research presented in this paper aims to guide the AI community towards a future where technological progress and environmental stewardship go hand-in-hand.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, Emma Strubell
0
0
Recent years have seen a surge in the popularity of commercial AI products based on generative, multi-purpose AI systems promising a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. However, this ambition of ``generality'' comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. In this work, we propose the first systematic comparison of the ongoing inference cost of various categories of ML systems, covering both task-specific (i.e. finetuned models that carry out a single task) and `general-purpose' models, (i.e. those trained for multiple tasks). We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We find that multi-purpose, generative architectures are orders of magnitude more expensive than task-specific systems for a variety of tasks, even when controlling for the number of model parameters. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions. All the data from our study can be accessed via an interactive demo to carry out further exploration and analysis.
5/27/2024
🚀
Towards A Comprehensive Assessment of AI's Environmental Impact
Srija Chakraborty
0
0
Artificial Intelligence, machine learning (AI/ML) has allowed exploring solutions for a variety of environmental and climate questions ranging from natural disasters, greenhouse gas emission, monitoring biodiversity, agriculture, to weather and climate modeling, enabling progress towards climate change mitigation. However, the intersection of AI/ML and environment is not always positive. The recent surge of interest in ML, made possible by processing very large volumes of data, fueled by access to massive compute power, has sparked a trend towards large-scale adoption of AI/ML. This interest places tremendous pressure on natural resources, that are often overlooked and under-reported. There is a need for a framework that monitors the environmental impact and degradation from AI/ML throughout its lifecycle for informing policymakers, stakeholders to adequately implement standards and policies and track the policy outcome over time. For these policies to be effective, AI's environmental impact needs to be monitored in a spatially-disaggregated, timely manner across the globe at the key activity sites. This study proposes a methodology to track environmental variables relating to the multifaceted impact of AI around datacenters using openly available energy data and globally acquired satellite observations. We present a case study around Northern Virginia, United States that hosts a growing number of datacenters and observe changes in multiple satellite-based environmental metrics. We then discuss the steps to expand this methodology for comprehensive assessment of AI's environmental impact across the planet. We also identify data gaps and formulate recommendations for improving the understanding and monitoring AI-induced changes to the environment and climate.
5/24/2024
Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inference
Ioannis Mavromatis, Kostas Katsaros, Aftab Khan
0
0
Machine learning (ML) has seen tremendous advancements, but its environmental footprint remains a concern. Acknowledging the growing environmental impact of ML this paper investigates Green ML, examining various model architectures and hyperparameters in both training and inference phases to identify energy-efficient practices. Our study leverages software-based power measurements for ease of replication across diverse configurations, models and datasets. In this paper, we examine multiple models and hardware configurations to identify correlations across the various measurements and metrics and key contributors to energy reduction. Our analysis offers practical guidelines for constructing sustainable ML operations, emphasising energy consumption and carbon footprint reductions while maintaining performance. As identified, short-lived profiling can quantify the long-term expected energy consumption. Moreover, model parameters can also be used to accurately estimate the expected total energy without the need for extensive experimentation.
6/21/2024
Reducing the Barriers to Entry for Foundation Model Training
Paolo Faraboschi, Ellis Giles, Justin Hotard, Konstanty Owczarek, Andrew Wheeler
0
0
The world has recently witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in demands for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence applications. This spike in demand has imposed tremendous strain on the underlying technology stack in supply chain, GPU-accelerated hardware, software, datacenter power density, and energy consumption. If left on the current technological trajectory, future demands show insurmountable spending trends, further limiting market players, stifling innovation, and widening the technology gap. To address these challenges, we propose a fundamental change in the AI training infrastructure throughout the technology ecosystem. The changes require advancements in supercomputing and novel AI training approaches, from high-end software to low-level hardware, microprocessor, and chip design, while advancing the energy efficiency required by a sustainable infrastructure. This paper presents the analytical framework that quantitatively highlights the challenges and points to the opportunities to reduce the barriers to entry for training large language models.
4/16/2024