Enhancing Q&A Text Retrieval with Ranking Models: Benchmarking, fine-tuning and deploying Rerankers for RAG
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores techniques for enhancing question-answering (Q&A) text retrieval using ranking models.
- It benchmarks, fine-tunes, and deploys rerankers for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines.
- The research aims to improve the performance of RAG models, which combine retrieval and generation for Q&A tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on improving the text retrieval component of Q&A systems. These systems typically have two main parts: a retrieval module that finds relevant information in a database, and a generation module that uses that information to produce an answer.
The researchers looked at ways to enhance the retrieval module by using ranking models. Ranking models take a query (the question) and a set of candidate documents, and score how well each document matches the query. The highest-scoring documents are then used as input to the generation module.
The researchers benchmarked different ranking models to see how well they performed on Q&A tasks. They then fine-tuned the best-performing models to further improve their accuracy. Finally, they deployed the fine-tuned rerankers in RAG pipelines to see the impact on overall Q&A performance.
The key idea is that using more advanced ranking models can help the retrieval module do a better job of finding the most relevant information, which in turn leads to better answers being generated. This can be especially helpful for complex questions that require synthesizing information from multiple sources.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates various ranking models for improving the text retrieval component of RAG pipelines. RAG models combine retrieval and generation, using a retrieval module to find relevant passages from a knowledge base, and a generation module to produce an answer based on those passages.
The researchers benchmark the performance of different ranking models, including BM25, DPR, ColBERT, and ANCE, on Q&A datasets. They find that more sophisticated models like ColBERT and ANCE outperform simpler approaches like BM25.
They then fine-tune the best-performing ranking models using techniques like Query-Relevant Passage Mining and Iterative Fine-Tuning. This further boosts the models' accuracy on Q&A tasks.
Finally, the researchers deploy the fine-tuned rerankers in end-to-end RAG pipelines and evaluate the impact on overall Q&A performance. They show that using the more advanced rerankers leads to significant improvements in answer quality and task-specific metrics.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of ranking models for Q&A text retrieval, and the researchers acknowledge some potential limitations. For example, they note that the fine-tuning techniques they use may not generalize well to all domains, and that further research is needed to understand the optimal configurations for different types of Q&A tasks.
Additionally, the paper focuses on improving the retrieval component, but does not delve deeply into the generation module of RAG pipelines. It would be interesting to see how the advances in retrieval impact the overall end-to-end performance, and whether further improvements to the generation component could lead to even better results.
Finally, the paper does not address potential biases or fairness issues that could arise from using these ranking models in real-world Q&A systems. As these models become more widely deployed, it will be important to carefully consider their societal impacts and ensure they are not perpetuating or amplifying existing biases.
Conclusion
This paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of Q&A text retrieval by demonstrating the benefits of using advanced ranking models to enhance the performance of RAG pipelines. The researchers' thorough benchmarking, fine-tuning, and deployment of these models showcases the potential for significant improvements in answer quality and task-specific metrics.
The findings have important implications for the development of more accurate and reliable Q&A systems, which are increasingly being used in a variety of applications, from education to customer service. By focusing on the retrieval component, the researchers have opened up new avenues for further research and optimization of end-to-end Q&A architectures.
As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, this work highlights the importance of carefully evaluating and fine-tuning the individual components that make up complex AI systems. The insights and techniques presented in this paper can serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working to push the boundaries of what's possible in question-answering and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing Q&A Text Retrieval with Ranking Models: Benchmarking, fine-tuning and deploying Rerankers for RAG
Gabriel de Souza P. Moreira, Ronay Ak, Benedikt Schifferer, Mengyao Xu, Radek Osmulski, Even Oldridge
Ranking models play a crucial role in enhancing overall accuracy of text retrieval systems. These multi-stage systems typically utilize either dense embedding models or sparse lexical indices to retrieve relevant passages based on a given query, followed by ranking models that refine the ordering of the candidate passages by its relevance to the query. This paper benchmarks various publicly available ranking models and examines their impact on ranking accuracy. We focus on text retrieval for question-answering tasks, a common use case for Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. Our evaluation benchmarks include models some of which are commercially viable for industrial applications. We introduce a state-of-the-art ranking model, NV-RerankQA-Mistral-4B-v3, which achieves a significant accuracy increase of ~14% compared to pipelines with other rerankers. We also provide an ablation study comparing the fine-tuning of ranking models with different sizes, losses and self-attention mechanisms. Finally, we discuss challenges of text retrieval pipelines with ranking models in real-world industry applications, in particular the trade-offs among model size, ranking accuracy and system requirements like indexing and serving latency / throughput.
Read more9/14/2024
👀
0
RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG
Shengyu Mao, Yong Jiang, Boli Chen, Xiao Li, Peng Wang, Xinyu Wang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
As Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmentation Generation (RAG) techniques have evolved, query rewriting has been widely incorporated into the RAG system for downstream tasks like open-domain QA. Many works have attempted to utilize small models with reinforcement learning rather than costly LLMs to improve query rewriting. However, current methods require annotations (e.g., labeled relevant documents or downstream answers) or predesigned rewards for feedback, which lack generalization, and fail to utilize signals tailored for query rewriting. In this paper, we propose ours, a framework for training query rewriting models free of annotations. By leveraging a publicly available reranker, ours~provides feedback aligned well with the rewriting objectives. Experimental results demonstrate that ours~can obtain better performance than baselines.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Enhancing Q&A with Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning: A Comparative Study
Zooey Nguyen, Anthony Annunziata, Vinh Luong, Sang Dinh, Quynh Le, Anh Hai Ha, Chanh Le, Hong An Phan, Shruti Raghavan, Christopher Nguyen
This paper investigates the impact of domain-specific model fine-tuning and of reasoning mechanisms on the performance of question-answering (Q&A) systems powered by large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Using the FinanceBench SEC financial filings dataset, we observe that, for RAG, combining a fine-tuned embedding model with a fine-tuned LLM achieves better accuracy than generic models, with relatively greater gains attributable to fine-tuned embedding models. Additionally, employing reasoning iterations on top of RAG delivers an even bigger jump in performance, enabling the Q&A systems to get closer to human-expert quality. We discuss the implications of such findings, propose a structured technical design space capturing major technical components of Q&A AI, and provide recommendations for making high-impact technical choices for such components. We plan to follow up on this work with actionable guides for AI teams and further investigations into the impact of domain-specific augmentation in RAG and into agentic AI capabilities such as advanced planning and reasoning.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documents
Spurthi Setty, Harsh Thakkar, Alyssa Lee, Eden Chung, Natan Vidra
The effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating accurate responses relies heavily on the quality of input provided, particularly when employing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. RAG enhances LLMs by sourcing the most relevant text chunk(s) to base queries upon. Despite the significant advancements in LLMs' response quality in recent years, users may still encounter inaccuracies or irrelevant answers; these issues often stem from suboptimal text chunk retrieval by RAG rather than the inherent capabilities of LLMs. To augment the efficacy of LLMs, it is crucial to refine the RAG process. This paper explores the existing constraints of RAG pipelines and introduces methodologies for enhancing text retrieval. It delves into strategies such as sophisticated chunking techniques, query expansion, the incorporation of metadata annotations, the application of re-ranking algorithms, and the fine-tuning of embedding algorithms. Implementing these approaches can substantially improve the retrieval quality, thereby elevating the overall performance and reliability of LLMs in processing and responding to queries.
Read more8/2/2024