Enhancing SQL Query Generation with Neurosymbolic Reasoning

Read original: arXiv:2408.13888 - Published 8/27/2024 by Henrijs Princis, Cristina David, Alan Mycroft
Total Score

0

🛸

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Neurosymbolic approaches combine the strengths of symbolic reasoning and neural networks.
  • This work proposes a neurosymbolic architecture for generating SQL queries.
  • It uses a Best-First Search algorithm to build and explore a solution tree, with the ability to backtrack.
  • The architecture integrates a Language Model (LM) with symbolic modules to catch and correct errors made by the LM, as well as guide the exploration of the solution tree.
  • The focus is on improving the performance of smaller open-source LMs.
  • The proposed tool, Xander, increases accuracy by an average of 10.9% and reduces runtime by an average of 28% compared to the LM without Xander.

Plain English Explanation

Neurosymbolic approaches try to combine the strengths of two different types of AI systems: symbolic reasoning and neural networks. Symbolic reasoning is good at logical thinking and following clear rules, while neural networks are more flexible and can learn patterns from data.

In this research, the authors developed a neurosymbolic system for generating SQL queries, which are the commands used to interact with databases. The system uses a Best-First Search algorithm to explore different possible SQL queries, similar to how a human might try out different options to find the right solution.

The key innovation is that the system integrates a Language Model (a type of neural network) with additional "symbolic" modules. These modules help catch and fix any mistakes the Language Model makes when generating SQL queries. They also guide the exploration process to find the best solution more efficiently.

The researchers focused on improving the performance of smaller, open-source Language Models, which are often less accurate than larger, more complex models. By combining the Language Model with the symbolic modules, they were able to increase the accuracy of the smaller model by an average of 10.9% and reduce the runtime by 28%, allowing it to outperform a much larger Language Model on its own.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a neurosymbolic architecture for generating SQL queries, called Xander, that combines a Language Model (LM) with symbolic modules to improve performance.

The key components of the architecture are:

  1. Solution Tree Exploration: Xander uses a Best-First Search algorithm to build and explore a tree of possible SQL query solutions. This allows it to backtrack and explore alternative options if needed.

  2. Language Model Integration: Xander integrates a Language Model to generate initial SQL query candidates. This provides flexibility and the ability to learn from data.

  3. Symbolic Modules: Xander includes symbolic modules that can catch and correct errors made by the Language Model, as well as guide the exploration of the solution tree. These modules encode domain-specific knowledge and reasoning.

The researchers focused on improving the performance of smaller, open-source Language Models, which are often less accurate than larger, more complex models. They found that by combining the Language Model with the symbolic modules, Xander was able to increase accuracy by an average of 10.9% and reduce runtime by an average of 28% compared to the Language Model alone. This allowed the smaller model with Xander to outperform a four-times larger Language Model without the neurosymbolic enhancements.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising neurosymbolic approach for generating SQL queries, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generalization to Other Domains: The evaluation is focused on SQL query generation, which is a specific task. It's unclear how well the proposed architecture would generalize to other domains that require a combination of language understanding and symbolic reasoning.

  2. Scalability and Complexity: The authors note that the symbolic modules add complexity to the system. As the problem size and knowledge base grow, maintaining the symbolic components and ensuring they work seamlessly with the Language Model may become challenging.

  3. Interpretability and Explainability: Neurosymbolic approaches aim to combine the strengths of neural networks and symbolic reasoning. However, the paper does not discuss the interpretability or explainability of the final system, which is an important consideration for many real-world applications.

  4. Interaction with Larger Language Models: The focus of the paper is on improving the performance of smaller, open-source Language Models. It would be interesting to see how the proposed architecture would perform when integrated with larger, more powerful Language Models, which may have different strengths and weaknesses.

Overall, the neurosymbolic approach presented in this paper shows promise, but further research is needed to explore its broader applicability, scalability, and interpretability.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a neurosymbolic architecture called Xander for generating SQL queries. Xander combines a Language Model with symbolic modules to improve the performance of smaller, open-source Language Models. By integrating the flexibility of the Language Model with the domain-specific knowledge and reasoning capabilities of the symbolic modules, Xander was able to increase accuracy by 10.9% and reduce runtime by 28% compared to the Language Model alone.

The neurosymbolic approach demonstrated in this work represents an interesting direction for combining the strengths of neural networks and symbolic reasoning to solve complex problems. While the current evaluation is focused on SQL query generation, the underlying principles could potentially be applied to a wider range of tasks that require both language understanding and logical reasoning. Further research is needed to explore the generalization, scalability, and interpretability of such neurosymbolic systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

Total Score

0

Enhancing SQL Query Generation with Neurosymbolic Reasoning

Henrijs Princis, Cristina David, Alan Mycroft

Neurosymbolic approaches blend the effectiveness of symbolic reasoning with the flexibility of neural networks. In this work, we propose a neurosymbolic architecture for generating SQL queries that builds and explores a solution tree using Best-First Search, with the possibility of backtracking. For this purpose, it integrates a Language Model (LM) with symbolic modules that help catch and correct errors made by the LM on SQL queries, as well as guiding the exploration of the solution tree. We focus on improving the performance of smaller open-source LMs, and we find that our tool, Xander, increases accuracy by an average of 10.9% and reduces runtime by an average of 28% compared to the LM without Xander, enabling a smaller LM (with Xander) to outperform its four-times larger counterpart (without Xander).

Read more

8/27/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey

Lauren Nicole DeLong (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Ramon Fern'andez Mir (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Jacques D. Fleuriot (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute)

Neurosymbolic AI is an increasingly active area of research that combines symbolic reasoning methods with deep learning to leverage their complementary benefits. As knowledge graphs are becoming a popular way to represent heterogeneous and multi-relational data, methods for reasoning on graph structures have attempted to follow this neurosymbolic paradigm. Traditionally, such approaches have utilized either rule-based inference or generated representative numerical embeddings from which patterns could be extracted. However, several recent studies have attempted to bridge this dichotomy to generate models that facilitate interpretability, maintain competitive performance, and integrate expert knowledge. Therefore, we survey methods that perform neurosymbolic reasoning tasks on knowledge graphs and propose a novel taxonomy by which we can classify them. Specifically, we propose three major categories: (1) logically-informed embedding approaches, (2) embedding approaches with logical constraints, and (3) rule learning approaches. Alongside the taxonomy, we provide a tabular overview of the approaches and links to their source code, if available, for more direct comparison. Finally, we discuss the unique characteristics and limitations of these methods, then propose several prospective directions toward which this field of research could evolve.

Read more

5/17/2024

Neuro-symbolic Training for Reasoning over Spatial Language
Total Score

0

Neuro-symbolic Training for Reasoning over Spatial Language

Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi

Recent research shows that more data and larger models can provide more accurate solutions to natural language problems requiring reasoning. However, models can easily fail to provide solutions in unobserved complex input compositions due to not achieving the level of abstraction required for generalizability. To alleviate this issue, we propose training the language models with neuro-symbolic techniques that can exploit the logical rules of reasoning as constraints and provide additional supervision sources to the model. Training models to adhere to the regulations of reasoning pushes them to make more effective abstractions needed for generalizability and transfer learning. We focus on a challenging problem of spatial reasoning over text. Our results on various benchmarks using multiple language models confirm our hypothesis of effective domain transfer based on neuro-symbolic training.

Read more

6/21/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Lucy: Think and Reason to Solve Text-to-SQL

Nina Narodytska, Shay Vargaftik

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in assisting users to query databases in natural language. While LLM-based techniques provide state-of-the-art results on many standard benchmarks, their performance significantly drops when applied to large enterprise databases. The reason is that these databases have a large number of tables with complex relationships that are challenging for LLMs to reason about. We analyze challenges that LLMs face in these settings and propose a new solution that combines the power of LLMs in understanding questions with automated reasoning techniques to handle complex database constraints. Based on these ideas, we have developed a new framework that outperforms state-of-the-art techniques in zero-shot text-to-SQL on complex benchmarks

Read more

7/9/2024