Enriching Disentanglement: From Logical Definitions to Quantitative Metrics

Read original: arXiv:2305.11512 - Published 5/22/2024 by Yivan Zhang, Masashi Sugiyama
Total Score

0

🛸

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Disentangling the underlying factors in complex data is a promising approach for building generalizable and data-efficient machine learning models.
  • While various quantitative metrics have been proposed to measure the quality of disentangled representations, it's unclear what these metrics actually quantify.
  • This paper establishes a theoretical connection between logical definitions of disentanglement and quantitative metrics using advanced mathematical frameworks.
  • The proposed approach can convert logical definitions into differentiable, learnable objectives that capture different aspects of disentangled representations.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are often trained on large, complex datasets, but it can be challenging for them to generalize beyond the specific data they were trained on. Disentangled representation learning is a promising approach that aims to discover the underlying factors or "hidden variables" that generate the observed data. By learning representations that are disentangled, or separated, into these distinct factors, models can potentially become more robust and generalizable.

Researchers have proposed various quantitative metrics to evaluate the quality of disentangled representations, but it's not always clear what these metrics are actually measuring. This paper tackles this challenge by establishing a strong theoretical foundation for connecting logical definitions of disentanglement to these quantitative measures.

The key idea is to translate logical statements about disentanglement into a real-valued quantity that can be used as a learning objective for training models. This is done by replacing logical concepts like equality with more flexible "premetrics," binary truth values with continuous "quantales," and quantifiers with aggregators. The resulting metrics have strong theoretical guarantees and can be easily differentiated, allowing them to be used directly as part of the training process.

By grounding disentanglement metrics in rigorous mathematical frameworks like topos theory and enriched category theory, this work helps clarify what these metrics are actually measuring and how they relate to the underlying logical definitions of disentanglement. The authors then demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed metrics through empirical experiments that isolate different aspects of disentangled representations.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by noting the importance of disentangled representation learning for building generalizable and data-efficient machine learning models. While various quantitative metrics have been proposed to measure the quality of disentangled representations, the authors argue that it remains unclear what these metrics truly quantify.

To address this gap, the researchers establish a theoretical connection between logical definitions of disentanglement and quantitative metrics using advanced mathematical frameworks like topos theory and enriched category theory. They introduce a systematic approach for converting a first-order predicate into a real-valued quantity by replacing:

  1. Equality with a strict premetric
  2. The Heyting algebra of binary truth values with a quantale of continuous values
  3. Quantifiers with aggregators

The resulting metrics induced by these logical definitions have strong theoretical guarantees, and some of them are easily differentiable, allowing them to be used as learning objectives directly during model training.

The paper then presents empirical experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed metrics in isolating different aspects of disentangled representations. By grounding the evaluation of disentanglement in rigorous mathematical foundations, this work helps clarify the meaning and interpretation of these important metrics.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and technical approach to bridging the gap between logical definitions of disentanglement and quantitative metrics for evaluating disentangled representations. The use of advanced mathematical frameworks like topos theory and enriched category theory provides a strong theoretical foundation for the proposed methods.

One potential limitation of the work is the level of mathematical sophistication required to fully appreciate the technical details. While the authors do a commendable job of explaining the key ideas in accessible language, the underlying concepts may still be challenging for some readers without a background in these advanced mathematical disciplines.

Additionally, while the empirical experiments showcase the effectiveness of the proposed metrics, it would be interesting to see how they perform in comparison to other popular disentanglement metrics, such as those used in previous research on this topic. A more comprehensive benchmarking effort could help further validate the utility of the authors' approach.

That said, the paper represents a significant contribution to the field of disentangled representation learning by providing a rigorous, principled framework for defining and measuring disentanglement. The insights and techniques presented here could have important implications for the emergence of large language models and other complex machine learning systems that rely on the discovery of underlying explanatory factors.

Conclusion

This paper establishes a strong theoretical foundation for connecting logical definitions of disentanglement to quantitative metrics that can be used to evaluate the quality of disentangled representations in machine learning models. By grounding the evaluation of disentanglement in advanced mathematical frameworks, the authors have provided a systematic approach for converting logical statements into differentiable, learnable objectives.

The proposed metrics have the potential to significantly advance the field of disentangled representation learning, enabling the development of more generalizable and data-efficient machine learning models. As the complexity of AI systems continues to grow, tools like these that can help unpack the "black box" of deep learning will become increasingly valuable for both researchers and practitioners.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

Total Score

0

Enriching Disentanglement: From Logical Definitions to Quantitative Metrics

Yivan Zhang, Masashi Sugiyama

Disentangling the explanatory factors in complex data is a promising approach for generalizable and data-efficient representation learning. While a variety of quantitative metrics for learning and evaluating disentangled representations have been proposed, it remains unclear what properties these metrics truly quantify. In this work, we establish a theoretical connection between logical definitions of disentanglement and quantitative metrics using topos theory and enriched category theory. We introduce a systematic approach for converting a first-order predicate into a real-valued quantity by replacing (i) equality with a strict premetric, (ii) the Heyting algebra of binary truth values with a quantale of continuous values, and (iii) quantifiers with aggregators. The metrics induced by logical definitions have strong theoretical guarantees, and some of them are easily differentiable and can be used as learning objectives directly. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed metrics by isolating different aspects of disentangled representations.

Read more

5/22/2024

Defining and Measuring Disentanglement for non-Independent Factors of Variation
Total Score

0

Defining and Measuring Disentanglement for non-Independent Factors of Variation

Antonio Almud'evar, Alfonso Ortega, Luis Vicente, Antonio Miguel, Eduardo Lleida

Representation learning is an approach that allows to discover and extract the factors of variation from the data. Intuitively, a representation is said to be disentangled if it separates the different factors of variation in a way that is understandable to humans. Definitions of disentanglement and metrics to measure it usually assume that the factors of variation are independent of each other. However, this is generally false in the real world, which limits the use of these definitions and metrics to very specific and unrealistic scenarios. In this paper we give a definition of disentanglement based on information theory that is also valid when the factors of variation are not independent. Furthermore, we relate this definition to the Information Bottleneck Method. Finally, we propose a method to measure the degree of disentanglement from the given definition that works when the factors of variation are not independent. We show through different experiments that the method proposed in this paper correctly measures disentanglement with non-independent factors of variation, while other methods fail in this scenario.

Read more

8/14/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Disentanglement Learning via Topology

Nikita Balabin, Daria Voronkova, Ilya Trofimov, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov

We propose TopDis (Topological Disentanglement), a method for learning disentangled representations via adding a multi-scale topological loss term. Disentanglement is a crucial property of data representations substantial for the explainability and robustness of deep learning models and a step towards high-level cognition. The state-of-the-art methods are based on VAE and encourage the joint distribution of latent variables to be factorized. We take a different perspective on disentanglement by analyzing topological properties of data manifolds. In particular, we optimize the topological similarity for data manifolds traversals. To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first one to propose a differentiable topological loss for disentanglement learning. Our experiments have shown that the proposed TopDis loss improves disentanglement scores such as MIG, FactorVAE score, SAP score, and DCI disentanglement score with respect to state-of-the-art results while preserving the reconstruction quality. Our method works in an unsupervised manner, permitting us to apply it to problems without labeled factors of variation. The TopDis loss works even when factors of variation are correlated. Additionally, we show how to use the proposed topological loss to find disentangled directions in a trained GAN.

Read more

6/6/2024

Linear causal disentanglement via higher-order cumulants
Total Score

0

Linear causal disentanglement via higher-order cumulants

Paula Leyes Carreno, Chiara Meroni, Anna Seigal

Linear causal disentanglement is a recent method in causal representation learning to describe a collection of observed variables via latent variables with causal dependencies between them. It can be viewed as a generalization of both independent component analysis and linear structural equation models. We study the identifiability of linear causal disentanglement, assuming access to data under multiple contexts, each given by an intervention on a latent variable. We show that one perfect intervention on each latent variable is sufficient and in the worst case necessary to recover parameters under perfect interventions, generalizing previous work to allow more latent than observed variables. We give a constructive proof that computes parameters via a coupled tensor decomposition. For soft interventions, we find the equivalence class of latent graphs and parameters that are consistent with observed data, via the study of a system of polynomial equations. Our results hold assuming the existence of non-zero higher-order cumulants, which implies non-Gaussianity of variables.

Read more

7/8/2024