Environment Design for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
2210.14972
0
0
🏅
Abstract
Learning a reward function from demonstrations suffers from low sample-efficiency. Even with abundant data, current inverse reinforcement learning methods that focus on learning from a single environment can fail to handle slight changes in the environment dynamics. We tackle these challenges through adaptive environment design. In our framework, the learner repeatedly interacts with the expert, with the former selecting environments to identify the reward function as quickly as possible from the expert's demonstrations in said environments. This results in improvements in both sample-efficiency and robustness, as we show experimentally, for both exact and approximate inference.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Current inverse reinforcement learning methods struggle with low sample-efficiency and lack of robustness to changes in environment dynamics
- The paper proposes a framework called "adaptive environment design" to address these challenges
- The key idea is to have the learner repeatedly interact with the expert, selecting environments that help identify the reward function as quickly as possible from the expert's demonstrations
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers tackle the problem of learning a reward function from expert demonstrations. This is a common approach in reinforcement learning, where the goal is to learn what reward function the expert is optimizing for based on their actions.
However, current methods that focus on learning from a single environment can struggle with low sample-efficiency and lack of robustness when the environment dynamics change slightly. To address these challenges, the researchers propose a new framework called "adaptive environment design."
The core idea is to have the learner repeatedly interact with the expert, but rather than just observing the expert in a fixed environment, the learner gets to choose the environments. The goal is to select environments that will help the learner identify the reward function as quickly as possible based on the expert's demonstrations in those environments.
This approach can lead to improvements in both sample-efficiency and robustness, as the learner can actively explore a variety of environments to better understand the underlying reward function.
Technical Explanation
The key technical innovation in this paper is the framework of "adaptive environment design." Instead of passively observing the expert in a single environment, the learner is given the ability to choose the environments in which the expert will demonstrate their behavior.
The learner's goal is to select environments that will provide the most informative demonstrations from the expert in order to identify the underlying reward function as quickly as possible. This is formulated as an optimization problem, where the learner tries to minimize the expected error in the estimated reward function.
The researchers show that this approach can lead to significant improvements in sample-efficiency and robustness compared to standard inverse reinforcement learning methods. They demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through both exact and approximate inference techniques.
Critical Analysis
The proposed "adaptive environment design" framework is a promising approach to addressing the limitations of current inverse reinforcement learning methods. By actively selecting environments, the learner can potentially gain a much richer understanding of the expert's reward function in fewer interactions.
However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the environment selection process. Implementing this approach in practice may be challenging, especially if the space of possible environments is very large. Additionally, the paper does not address how the learner can ensure that the chosen environments are feasible or realistic for the expert to demonstrate in.
Further research could explore ways to make the environment selection more efficient and practical, as well as investigate the potential for negative transfer if the chosen environments are too different from the real-world scenarios the expert is meant to operate in.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel framework called "adaptive environment design" to improve the sample-efficiency and robustness of inverse reinforcement learning. By allowing the learner to actively select the environments in which the expert demonstrates their behavior, the approach can help identify the underlying reward function more effectively than traditional methods.
While the proposed approach shows promise, it also raises some practical concerns that warrant further exploration. Nonetheless, the core idea of actively shaping the learning process through environment selection is an intriguing direction that could lead to significant advancements in the field of inverse reinforcement learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Juntao Ren, Gokul Swamy, Zhiwei Steven Wu, J. Andrew Bagnell, Sanjiban Choudhury
0
0
The inverse reinforcement learning approach to imitation learning is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can enable learning from a smaller number of expert demonstrations with more robustness to error compounding than behavioral cloning approaches. On the other hand, it requires that the learner repeatedly solve a computationally expensive reinforcement learning (RL) problem. Often, much of this computation is wasted searching over policies very dissimilar to the expert's. In this work, we propose using hybrid RL -- training on a mixture of online and expert data -- to curtail unnecessary exploration. Intuitively, the expert data focuses the learner on good states during training, which reduces the amount of exploration required to compute a strong policy. Notably, such an approach doesn't need the ability to reset the learner to arbitrary states in the environment, a requirement of prior work in efficient inverse RL. More formally, we derive a reduction from inverse RL to expert-competitive RL (rather than globally optimal RL) that allows us to dramatically reduce interaction during the inner policy search loop while maintaining the benefits of the IRL approach. This allows us to derive both model-free and model-based hybrid inverse RL algorithms with strong policy performance guarantees. Empirically, we find that our approaches are significantly more sample efficient than standard inverse RL and several other baselines on a suite of continuous control tasks.
6/6/2024
EvIL: Evolution Strategies for Generalisable Imitation Learning
Silvia Sapora, Gokul Swamy, Chris Lu, Yee Whye Teh, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster
0
0
Often times in imitation learning (IL), the environment we collect expert demonstrations in and the environment we want to deploy our learned policy in aren't exactly the same (e.g. demonstrations collected in simulation but deployment in the real world). Compared to policy-centric approaches to IL like behavioural cloning, reward-centric approaches like inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) often better replicate expert behaviour in new environments. This transfer is usually performed by optimising the recovered reward under the dynamics of the target environment. However, (a) we find that modern deep IL algorithms frequently recover rewards which induce policies far weaker than the expert, even in the same environment the demonstrations were collected in. Furthermore, (b) these rewards are often quite poorly shaped, necessitating extensive environment interaction to optimise effectively. We provide simple and scalable fixes to both of these concerns. For (a), we find that reward model ensembles combined with a slightly different training objective significantly improves re-training and transfer performance. For (b), we propose a novel evolution-strategies based method EvIL to optimise for a reward-shaping term that speeds up re-training in the target environment, closing a gap left open by the classical theory of IRL. On a suite of continuous control tasks, we are able to re-train policies in target (and source) environments more interaction-efficiently than prior work.
6/19/2024
RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning
Mert Albaba, Sammy Christen, Christoph Gebhardt, Thomas Langarek, Michael J. Black, Otmar Hilliges
0
0
Reinforcement Learning has achieved significant success in generating complex behavior but often requires extensive reward function engineering. Adversarial variants of Imitation Learning and Inverse Reinforcement Learning offer an alternative by learning policies from expert demonstrations via a discriminator. Employing discriminators increases their data- and computational efficiency over the standard approaches; however, results in sensitivity to imperfections in expert data. We propose RILe, a teacher-student system that achieves both robustness to imperfect data and efficiency. In RILe, the student learns an action policy while the teacher dynamically adjusts a reward function based on the student's performance and its alignment with expert demonstrations. By tailoring the reward function to both performance of the student and expert similarity, our system reduces dependence on the discriminator and, hence, increases robustness against data imperfections. Experiments show that RILe outperforms existing methods by 2x in settings with limited or noisy expert data.
6/13/2024
Discovering Minimal Reinforcement Learning Environments
Jarek Liesen, Chris Lu, Andrei Lupu, Jakob N. Foerster, Henning Sprekeler, Robert T. Lange
0
0
Reinforcement learning (RL) agents are commonly trained and evaluated in the same environment. In contrast, humans often train in a specialized environment before being evaluated, such as studying a book before taking an exam. The potential of such specialized training environments is still vastly underexplored, despite their capacity to dramatically speed up training. The framework of synthetic environments takes a first step in this direction by meta-learning neural network-based Markov decision processes (MDPs). The initial approach was limited to toy problems and produced environments that did not transfer to unseen RL algorithms. We extend this approach in three ways: Firstly, we modify the meta-learning algorithm to discover environments invariant towards hyperparameter configurations and learning algorithms. Secondly, by leveraging hardware parallelism and introducing a curriculum on an agent's evaluation episode horizon, we can achieve competitive results on several challenging continuous control problems. Thirdly, we surprisingly find that contextual bandits enable training RL agents that transfer well to their evaluation environment, even if it is a complex MDP. Hence, we set up our experiments to train synthetic contextual bandits, which perform on par with synthetic MDPs, yield additional insights into the evaluation environment, and can speed up downstream applications.
6/19/2024