Estimating Joint interventional distributions from marginal interventional data

Read original: arXiv:2409.01794 - Published 9/4/2024 by Sergio Hernan Garrido Mejia, Elke Kirschbaum, Armin Keki'c, Atalanti Mastakouri
Total Score

0

Estimating Joint interventional distributions from marginal interventional data

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for deriving causal order from single-variable interventions.
  • The proposed approach utilizes a Bayesian framework to model the causal structure and infer the directionality of causal relationships from experimental data.
  • The method is demonstrated on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showcasing its ability to recover the underlying causal order.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a key challenge in causal inference: understanding the directionality of causal relationships. Causal inference is the process of identifying the underlying causes and effects in a system, which is crucial for making informed decisions.

Traditionally, establishing causal order has required interventions on multiple variables, such as performing experiments where different variables are manipulated. However, this can be time-consuming and may not always be feasible. The authors of this paper propose a new method that can infer causal order from experiments involving interventions on a single variable.

The method uses a Bayesian approach to model the causal structure and then analyzes the observed data to determine the directionality of the causal relationships. This allows the researchers to uncover the underlying causal order without needing to perform multiple, complex experiments.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach on both simulated data and real-world datasets, showing that it can successfully recover the true causal order in a variety of scenarios. This represents an important advance in causal inference, as it can lead to more efficient and cost-effective ways of understanding the causal relationships in complex systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a Bayesian method for deriving causal order from single-variable interventions. The key idea is to model the causal structure using a directed acyclic graph (DAG), where the nodes represent variables and the directed edges represent causal relationships.

The authors propose a generative model that describes how the observed data is generated from the underlying causal structure. This model includes parameters that encode the causal order, as well as the strength of the causal relationships. By performing Bayesian inference on this model, the researchers can estimate the posterior distribution over the causal order, given the observed data.

The method is evaluated on both synthetic and real-world datasets, including time-series data and linear-Gaussian systems. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach can accurately recover the true causal order, even when only a single variable is intervened upon.

One key advantage of this method is its ability to work with limited experimental data, which can be particularly valuable in settings where performing extensive interventions is challenging or costly. The authors also discuss potential extensions and limitations of the approach, highlighting areas for future research.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to causal inference from single-variable interventions. The Bayesian framework used to model the causal structure is well-grounded in statistical theory and provides a principled way to handle uncertainty in the causal relationships.

One potential limitation of the method is its reliance on specific assumptions, such as the linearity of the causal relationships and the acyclicity of the underlying causal graph. While the authors demonstrate the method's robustness to various data-generating processes, it would be valuable to explore its performance on more complex, nonlinear causal models.

Additionally, the paper does not extensively discuss the potential biases or confounding factors that may arise in real-world settings, where unmeasured variables or hidden common causes could affect the observed data. Further research is needed to understand the method's sensitivity to such issues and develop strategies to mitigate them.

Overall, this work represents an important contribution to the field of causal inference, as it provides a promising approach for efficiently uncovering causal relationships from limited experimental data. The authors' emphasis on the practical implications and potential applications of their method is commendable, and it will be interesting to see how this research evolves and is applied in diverse domains.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Bayesian method for deriving causal order from single-variable interventions. The proposed approach models the causal structure using a directed acyclic graph and performs Bayesian inference to estimate the posterior distribution over the causal order, given the observed data.

The key innovation of this work is its ability to uncover the directionality of causal relationships using a relatively small number of experiments, which can be particularly valuable in settings where performing extensive interventions is challenging or costly. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showcasing its potential to advance the field of causal inference.

While the method has some limitations, such as its reliance on certain assumptions, this research represents an important step forward in developing efficient and reliable techniques for causal discovery. As the field of causal inference continues to evolve, approaches like the one presented in this paper will likely play a crucial role in helping researchers and decision-makers better understand the complexities of the world around us.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Estimating Joint interventional distributions from marginal interventional data
Total Score

0

Estimating Joint interventional distributions from marginal interventional data

Sergio Hernan Garrido Mejia, Elke Kirschbaum, Armin Keki'c, Atalanti Mastakouri

In this paper we show how to exploit interventional data to acquire the joint conditional distribution of all the variables using the Maximum Entropy principle. To this end, we extend the Causal Maximum Entropy method to make use of interventional data in addition to observational data. Using Lagrange duality, we prove that the solution to the Causal Maximum Entropy problem with interventional constraints lies in the exponential family, as in the Maximum Entropy solution. Our method allows us to perform two tasks of interest when marginal interventional distributions are provided for any subset of the variables. First, we show how to perform causal feature selection from a mixture of observational and single-variable interventional data, and, second, how to infer joint interventional distributions. For the former task, we show on synthetically generated data, that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art method on merging datasets, and yields comparable results to the KCI-test which requires access to joint observations of all variables.

Read more

9/4/2024

Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm
Total Score

0

Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm

Mathieu Chevalley, Patrick Schwab, Arash Mehrjou

Targeted and uniform interventions to a system are crucial for unveiling causal relationships. While several methods have been developed to leverage interventional data for causal structure learning, their practical application in real-world scenarios often remains challenging. Recent benchmark studies have highlighted these difficulties, even when large numbers of single-variable intervention samples are available. In this work, we demonstrate, both theoretically and empirically, that such datasets contain a wealth of causal information that can be effectively extracted under realistic assumptions about the data distribution. More specifically, we introduce the notion of interventional faithfulness, which relies on comparisons between the marginal distributions of each variable across observational and interventional settings, and we introduce a score on causal orders. Under this assumption, we are able to prove strong theoretical guarantees on the optimum of our score that also hold for large-scale settings. To empirically verify our theory, we introduce Intersort, an algorithm designed to infer the causal order from datasets containing large numbers of single-variable interventions by approximately optimizing our score. Intersort outperforms baselines (GIES, PC and EASE) on almost all simulated data settings replicating common benchmarks in the field. Our proposed novel approach to modeling interventional datasets thus offers a promising avenue for advancing causal inference, highlighting significant potential for further enhancements under realistic assumptions.

Read more

5/29/2024

Bayesian Intervention Optimization for Causal Discovery
Total Score

0

Bayesian Intervention Optimization for Causal Discovery

Yuxuan Wang, Mingzhou Liu, Xinwei Sun, Wei Wang, Yizhou Wang

Causal discovery is crucial for understanding complex systems and informing decisions. While observational data can uncover causal relationships under certain assumptions, it often falls short, making active interventions necessary. Current methods, such as Bayesian and graph-theoretical approaches, do not prioritize decision-making and often rely on ideal conditions or information gain, which is not directly related to hypothesis testing. We propose a novel Bayesian optimization-based method inspired by Bayes factors that aims to maximize the probability of obtaining decisive and correct evidence. Our approach uses observational data to estimate causal models under different hypotheses, evaluates potential interventions pre-experimentally, and iteratively updates priors to refine interventions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through various experiments. Our contributions provide a robust framework for efficient causal discovery through active interventions, enhancing the practical application of theoretical advancements.

Read more

6/18/2024

Learning Flexible Time-windowed Granger Causality Integrating Heterogeneous Interventional Time Series Data
Total Score

0

Learning Flexible Time-windowed Granger Causality Integrating Heterogeneous Interventional Time Series Data

Ziyi Zhang, Shaogang Ren, Xiaoning Qian, Nick Duffield

Granger causality, commonly used for inferring causal structures from time series data, has been adopted in widespread applications across various fields due to its intuitive explainability and high compatibility with emerging deep neural network prediction models. To alleviate challenges in better deciphering causal structures unambiguously from time series, the use of interventional data has become a practical approach. However, existing methods have yet to be explored in the context of imperfect interventions with unknown targets, which are more common and often more beneficial in a wide range of real-world applications. Additionally, the identifiability issues of Granger causality with unknown interventional targets in complex network models remain unsolved. Our work presents a theoretically-grounded method that infers Granger causal structure and identifies unknown targets by leveraging heterogeneous interventional time series data. We further illustrate that learning Granger causal structure and recovering interventional targets can mutually promote each other. Comparative experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms several robust baseline methods in learning Granger causal structure from interventional time series data.

Read more

6/18/2024