Learning Flexible Time-windowed Granger Causality Integrating Heterogeneous Interventional Time Series Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper presents a novel approach for learning flexible time-windowed Granger causality from heterogeneous interventional time series data. • The method integrates causal information from both observational and interventional data to better capture the complex temporal dynamics between variables. • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing improved performance over existing Granger causality methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the problem of understanding the causal relationships between different variables over time, using a technique called Granger causality. Granger causality is a way to determine whether changes in one variable can be used to predict changes in another variable.
However, real-world data is often messy and complex, with both observational data (where variables change naturally) and interventional data (where variables are deliberately manipulated). The authors' approach is designed to integrate both types of data to get a more accurate picture of the causal relationships.
The key idea is to use a "flexible time window" when looking at the causal relationships. This allows the method to capture more complex temporal dynamics, rather than assuming a fixed time lag between causes and effects.
The authors test their approach on both synthetic data (where the true causal relationships are known) and real-world datasets. They show that their method outperforms existing Granger causality techniques, particularly when dealing with the heterogeneous (diverse) data that is common in real-world situations.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel method for learning flexible time-windowed Granger causality that can effectively integrate heterogeneous interventional time series data. The authors build on existing Granger causality approaches, which aim to capture causal relationships by examining whether past values of one variable can be used to predict future values of another variable.
However, traditional Granger causality methods often struggle with real-world data that includes both observational and interventional components. The authors' approach, called REALTCD, addresses this by using a flexible time-windowing scheme that can capture more complex temporal dynamics, rather than assuming a fixed time lag.
The REALTCD method first learns a time-varying causal graph from the data, which represents the evolving causal relationships over time. It then uses a gradient-based intervention targeting approach to identify the most influential interventions that can be used to perturb the system and uncover additional causal information.
The authors evaluate their method on both synthetic benchmarks and real-world datasets, such as stock market and neuroimaging data. They show that REALTCD outperforms existing Granger causality techniques, particularly in scenarios with heterogeneous interventional data that is common in practice.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for learning flexible time-windowed Granger causality from complex, real-world data. The authors' focus on integrating observational and interventional data is particularly valuable, as most real-world systems involve a mixture of natural and controlled perturbations.
One potential limitation of the REALTCD method is its reliance on the assumption of linear Granger causality. While this assumption may hold for many applications, it may not capture more complex, nonlinear causal relationships. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest that future work could explore extensions to handle nonlinear dynamics, for example, by incorporating generalized rate-agnostic causal estimation techniques.
Additionally, the authors note that their method assumes the availability of high-quality interventional data, which may not always be feasible or practical to obtain in real-world settings. Further research could investigate strategies for dealing with noisy, sparse, or incomplete intervention data.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of causal discovery and time series analysis, providing a flexible and effective approach for learning Granger causality from heterogeneous data. The insights and techniques introduced in this work could have important implications for a wide range of applications, from finance and economics to neuroscience and systems biology.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel method called REALTCD for learning flexible time-windowed Granger causality from heterogeneous interventional time series data. The key innovation is the integration of both observational and interventional data to better capture the complex temporal dynamics between variables.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing significant performance improvements over existing Granger causality methods. This work represents an important advancement in the field of causal discovery, with potential applications in areas like finance, neuroscience, and systems biology, where understanding the complex causal relationships between variables is crucial.
While the method relies on some assumptions, such as linearity and the availability of high-quality interventional data, the authors highlight several promising directions for future research to address these limitations. Overall, this paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing effort to develop more robust and flexible tools for causal inference from time series data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning Flexible Time-windowed Granger Causality Integrating Heterogeneous Interventional Time Series Data
Ziyi Zhang, Shaogang Ren, Xiaoning Qian, Nick Duffield
Granger causality, commonly used for inferring causal structures from time series data, has been adopted in widespread applications across various fields due to its intuitive explainability and high compatibility with emerging deep neural network prediction models. To alleviate challenges in better deciphering causal structures unambiguously from time series, the use of interventional data has become a practical approach. However, existing methods have yet to be explored in the context of imperfect interventions with unknown targets, which are more common and often more beneficial in a wide range of real-world applications. Additionally, the identifiability issues of Granger causality with unknown interventional targets in complex network models remain unsolved. Our work presents a theoretically-grounded method that infers Granger causal structure and identifies unknown targets by leveraging heterogeneous interventional time series data. We further illustrate that learning Granger causal structure and recovering interventional targets can mutually promote each other. Comparative experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms several robust baseline methods in learning Granger causal structure from interventional time series data.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Interventional Causal Structure Discovery over Graphical Models with Convergence and Optimality Guarantees
Qiu Chengbo, Yang Kai
Learning causal structure from sampled data is a fundamental problem with applications in various fields, including healthcare, machine learning and artificial intelligence. Traditional methods predominantly rely on observational data, but there exist limits regarding the identifiability of causal structures with only observational data. Interventional data, on the other hand, helps establish a cause-and-effect relationship by breaking the influence of confounding variables. It remains to date under-explored to develop a mathematical framework that seamlessly integrates both observational and interventional data in causal structure learning. Furthermore, existing studies often focus on centralized approaches, necessitating the transfer of entire datasets to a single server, which lead to considerable communication overhead and heightened risks to privacy. To tackle these challenges, we develop a bilevel polynomial optimization (Bloom) framework. Bloom not only provides a powerful mathematical modeling framework, underpinned by theoretical support, for causal structure discovery from both interventional and observational data, but also aspires to an efficient causal discovery algorithm with convergence and optimality guarantees. We further extend Bloom to a distributed setting to reduce the communication overhead and mitigate data privacy risks. It is seen through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets that Bloom markedly surpasses other leading learning algorithms.
Read more8/12/2024
📊
0
LLM-Enhanced Causal Discovery in Temporal Domain from Interventional Data
Peiwen Li, Xin Wang, Zeyang Zhang, Yuan Meng, Fang Shen, Yue Li, Jialong Wang, Yang Li, Wenweu Zhu
In the field of Artificial Intelligence for Information Technology Operations, causal discovery is pivotal for operation and maintenance of graph construction, facilitating downstream industrial tasks such as root cause analysis. Temporal causal discovery, as an emerging method, aims to identify temporal causal relationships between variables directly from observations by utilizing interventional data. However, existing methods mainly focus on synthetic datasets with heavy reliance on intervention targets and ignore the textual information hidden in real-world systems, failing to conduct causal discovery for real industrial scenarios. To tackle this problem, in this paper we propose to investigate temporal causal discovery in industrial scenarios, which faces two critical challenges: 1) how to discover causal relationships without the interventional targets that are costly to obtain in practice, and 2) how to discover causal relations via leveraging the textual information in systems which can be complex yet abundant in industrial contexts. To address these challenges, we propose the RealTCD framework, which is able to leverage domain knowledge to discover temporal causal relationships without interventional targets. Specifically, we first develop a score-based temporal causal discovery method capable of discovering causal relations for root cause analysis without relying on interventional targets through strategic masking and regularization. Furthermore, by employing Large Language Models (LLMs) to handle texts and integrate domain knowledge, we introduce LLM-guided meta-initialization to extract the meta-knowledge from textual information hidden in systems to boost the quality of discovery. We conduct extensive experiments on simulation and real-world datasets to show the superiority of our proposed RealTCD framework over existing baselines in discovering temporal causal structures.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Discovering Mixtures of Structural Causal Models from Time Series Data
Sumanth Varambally, Yi-An Ma, Rose Yu
Discovering causal relationships from time series data is significant in fields such as finance, climate science, and neuroscience. However, contemporary techniques rely on the simplifying assumption that data originates from the same causal model, while in practice, data is heterogeneous and can stem from different causal models. In this work, we relax this assumption and perform causal discovery from time series data originating from a mixture of causal models. We propose a general variational inference-based framework called MCD to infer the underlying causal models as well as the mixing probability of each sample. Our approach employs an end-to-end training process that maximizes an evidence-lower bound for the data likelihood. We present two variants: MCD-Linear for linear relationships and independent noise, and MCD-Nonlinear for nonlinear causal relationships and history-dependent noise. We demonstrate that our method surpasses state-of-the-art benchmarks in causal discovery tasks through extensive experimentation on synthetic and real-world datasets, particularly when the data emanates from diverse underlying causal graphs. Theoretically, we prove the identifiability of such a model under some mild assumptions.
Read more6/26/2024