Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for estimating direct and indirect peer effects in observational network data.
- It addresses the challenge of separating the influence of an individual's own characteristics from the influence of their peers in a network.
- The proposed approach uses a doubly robust estimator to provide unbiased estimates of peer effects while accounting for potential confounding factors.
Plain English Explanation
In a social network, an individual's behavior or outcomes can be influenced by their own characteristics as well as the characteristics of the people they are connected to (their "peers"). Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data explores a way to separate these two types of influence.
The researchers recognize that an individual's peers may share similar characteristics, which could make it difficult to determine whether an observed outcome is due to the individual's own traits or the influence of their peers. To address this, they propose a "doubly robust" statistical method that can provide unbiased estimates of both the direct effect of an individual's own characteristics and the indirect effect of their peers' characteristics.
By applying this approach to observational network data, the researchers aim to better understand the mechanisms behind social influence and how it shapes individual outcomes within a network.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for estimating direct and indirect peer effects in observational network data. The direct effect refers to the influence of an individual's own characteristics on their outcomes, while the indirect effect captures the influence of their peers' characteristics.
To address the challenge of separating these two types of effects, the authors propose a doubly robust estimator. This method combines two statistical models: one for the outcome of interest (e.g., an individual's behavior or performance) and another for the network structure (i.e., how individuals are connected to their peers).
By using this doubly robust approach, the estimator can provide unbiased results even if one of the models is misspecified, as long as the other model is correctly specified. This helps to account for potential confounding factors that could influence both an individual's own characteristics and their peers' characteristics.
The paper demonstrates the application of this method using both simulated data and real-world network data, showing how it can be used to quantify the relative importance of direct and indirect peer effects in shaping individual outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a robust and principled approach for estimating peer effects in observational network data. The use of a doubly robust estimator is a key strength, as it helps to address the potential for model misspecification and confounding factors that can bias the results.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. For example, the method assumes that the network structure is exogenous (i.e., not influenced by the outcome of interest), which may not always be the case in real-world settings. Additionally, the paper notes that the proposed estimator may be computationally intensive for large-scale networks.
Further research could explore extensions of the method to handle more complex network dynamics, such as time-varying network structures or the presence of unobserved confounders. Exploring the performance of the method in a wider range of real-world applications would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for estimating direct and indirect peer effects in observational network data. By using a doubly robust estimator, the method can provide unbiased results while accounting for potential confounding factors.
The ability to separate the influence of an individual's own characteristics from the influence of their peers' characteristics is an important step in understanding the mechanisms of social influence within networks. This knowledge can inform a wide range of applications, from designing more effective interventions to predicting individual outcomes based on network dynamics.
Overall, this paper offers a valuable contribution to the field of network analysis and causal inference, and the proposed method has the potential to yield important insights in a variety of research and practical domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data
Xiaojing Du, Jiuyong Li, Debo Cheng, Lin Liu, Wentao Gao, Xiongren Chen
Estimating causal effects is crucial for decision-makers in many applications, but it is particularly challenging with observational network data due to peer interactions. Many algorithms have been proposed to estimate causal effects involving network data, particularly peer effects, but they often overlook the variety of peer effects. To address this issue, we propose a general setting which considers both peer direct effects and peer indirect effects, and the effect of an individual's own treatment, and provide identification conditions of these causal effects and proofs. To estimate these causal effects, we utilize attention mechanisms to distinguish the influences of different neighbors and explore high-order neighbor effects through multi-layer graph neural networks (GNNs). Additionally, to control the dependency between node features and representations, we incorporate the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) into the GNN, fully utilizing the structural information of the graph, to enhance the robustness and accuracy of the model. Extensive experiments on two semi-synthetic datasets confirm the effectiveness of our approach. Our theoretical findings have the potential to improve intervention strategies in networked systems, with applications in areas such as social networks and epidemiology.
Read more9/16/2024
🤷
0
Inferring Individual Direct Causal Effects Under Heterogeneous Peer Influence
Shishir Adhikari, Elena Zheleva
Causal inference in networks should account for interference, which occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced by treatments or outcomes of peers. Heterogeneous peer influence (HPI) occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced differently by different peers based on their attributes and relationships, or when each unit has a different susceptibility to peer influence. Existing solutions to estimating direct causal effects under interference consider either homogeneous influence from peers or specific heterogeneous influence mechanisms (e.g., based on local neighborhood structure). This paper presents a methodology for estimating individual direct causal effects in the presence of HPI where the mechanism of influence is not known a priori. We propose a structural causal model for networks that can capture different possible assumptions about network structure, interference conditions, and causal dependence and enables reasoning about identifiability in the presence of HPI. We find potential heterogeneous contexts using the causal model and propose a novel graph neural network-based estimator to estimate individual direct causal effects. We show that state-of-the-art methods for individual direct effect estimation produce biased results in the presence of HPI, and that our proposed estimator is robust.
Read more8/29/2024
🌐
0
Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects
Seyedeh Baharan Khatami, Harsh Parikh, Haowei Chen, Sudeepa Roy, Babak Salimi
We address the challenge of inferring causal effects in social network data. This results in challenges due to interference -- where a unit's outcome is affected by neighbors' treatments -- and network-induced confounding factors. While there is extensive literature focusing on estimating causal effects in social network setups, a majority of them make prior assumptions about the form of network-induced confounding mechanisms. Such strong assumptions are rarely likely to hold especially in high-dimensional networks. We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework to enable accurate and efficient estimation of direct and peer effects using a single observational social network. We demonstrate the semiparametric efficiency of our proposed estimator under mild regularity conditions, allowing for consistent uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate that our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study. We use our method to investigate the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance.
Read more6/4/2024
🎲
0
Cascade-based Randomization for Inferring Causal Effects under Diffusion Interference
Zahra Fatemi, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Elena Zheleva
The presence of interference, where the outcome of an individual may depend on the treatment assignment and behavior of neighboring nodes, can lead to biased causal effect estimation. Current approaches to network experiment design focus on limiting interference through cluster-based randomization, in which clusters are identified using graph clustering, and cluster randomization dictates the node assignment to treatment and control. However, cluster-based randomization approaches perform poorly when interference propagates in cascades, whereby the response of individuals to treatment propagates to their multi-hop neighbors. When we have knowledge of the cascade seed nodes, we can leverage this interference structure to mitigate the resulting causal effect estimation bias. With this goal, we propose a cascade-based network experiment design that initiates treatment assignment from the cascade seed node and propagates the assignment to their multi-hop neighbors to limit interference during cascade growth and thereby reduce the overall causal effect estimation error. Our extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms the existing state-of-the-art approaches in estimating causal effects in network data.
Read more5/22/2024