Inferring Individual Direct Causal Effects Under Heterogeneous Peer Influence

Read original: arXiv:2305.17479 - Published 8/29/2024 by Shishir Adhikari, Elena Zheleva

🤷

Overview

Causal inference in networks needs to account for interference, where a person's outcome is influenced by their peers' treatments or outcomes.
Heterogeneous peer influence (HPI) occurs when a person's outcome is influenced differently by different peers based on their attributes and relationships.
Existing solutions either consider homogeneous influence or specific heterogeneous influence mechanisms, but not the general case of unknown HPI.
This paper proposes a methodology to estimate individual direct causal effects in the presence of HPI, where the mechanism of influence is not known a priori.

Plain English Explanation

When studying causal relationships in social networks, it's important to consider how a person's outcomes can be influenced by their peers. Causal inference in networks refers to understanding how a person's treatment or actions can affect their own outcomes, as well as the outcomes of those around them.

Interference occurs when a person's outcome is influenced by the treatments or outcomes of their peers. For example, if we're studying the effect of a new educational program on student performance, a student's test scores may be impacted not just by whether they participated in the program, but also by how their classmates performed.

Heterogeneous peer influence (HPI) is when a person's outcome is influenced differently by different peers, based on factors like their attributes, relationships, or individual susceptibility to peer influence. Continuing the education example, some students may be more influenced by their high-performing peers, while others may be more influenced by their friends.

Previous research has either looked at homogeneous peer influence (where everyone is influenced equally) or specific heterogeneous influence mechanisms (like based on network structure). But this paper proposes a new method to handle the general case of HPI, where the mechanism of influence is unknown.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a structural causal model for networks that can capture different assumptions about network structure, interference conditions, and causal dependence. This allows them to reason about the identifiability of individual direct causal effects in the presence of HPI.

The researchers use this causal model to find potential heterogeneous contexts, and then propose a novel graph neural network-based estimator to estimate individual direct causal effects. This estimator is designed to be robust to the presence of HPI, unlike existing methods which can produce biased results in such cases.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a solid theoretical framework for handling HPI in causal inference, which is an important and challenging problem in network science. By using a structural causal model, the researchers are able to reason about identifiability and develop an estimator tailored to the HPI setting.

One limitation is that the proposed estimator relies on having access to rich network data, including information about individual attributes and relationships. In practice, this level of detailed network data may not always be available.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the performance of the estimator in larger, more complex networks. The experiments are conducted on relatively small synthetic networks, so further testing would be needed to understand how well the method scales.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in causal inference for networks, and the proposed methodology could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working in this area.

Conclusion

This paper addresses the challenge of causal inference in social networks by presenting a new approach to handling heterogeneous peer influence (HPI). The key contributions are a structural causal model for reasoning about identifiability under HPI, and a graph neural network-based estimator designed to be robust to this type of interference.

The proposed methodology could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from understanding the spread of information or behaviors in social media to evaluating the impacts of policy interventions in communities. By accounting for the complex ways in which people influence each other, this research brings us closer to accurately measuring the true causal effects in networked systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤷

Inferring Individual Direct Causal Effects Under Heterogeneous Peer Influence

Shishir Adhikari, Elena Zheleva

Causal inference in networks should account for interference, which occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced by treatments or outcomes of peers. Heterogeneous peer influence (HPI) occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced differently by different peers based on their attributes and relationships, or when each unit has a different susceptibility to peer influence. Existing solutions to estimating direct causal effects under interference consider either homogeneous influence from peers or specific heterogeneous influence mechanisms (e.g., based on local neighborhood structure). This paper presents a methodology for estimating individual direct causal effects in the presence of HPI where the mechanism of influence is not known a priori. We propose a structural causal model for networks that can capture different possible assumptions about network structure, interference conditions, and causal dependence and enables reasoning about identifiability in the presence of HPI. We find potential heterogeneous contexts using the causal model and propose a novel graph neural network-based estimator to estimate individual direct causal effects. We show that state-of-the-art methods for individual direct effect estimation produce biased results in the presence of HPI, and that our proposed estimator is robust.

8/29/2024

Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data

Xiaojing Du, Jiuyong Li, Debo Cheng, Lin Liu, Wentao Gao, Xiongren Chen

Estimating causal effects is crucial for decision-makers in many applications, but it is particularly challenging with observational network data due to peer interactions. Many algorithms have been proposed to estimate causal effects involving network data, particularly peer effects, but they often overlook the variety of peer effects. To address this issue, we propose a general setting which considers both peer direct effects and peer indirect effects, and the effect of an individual's own treatment, and provide identification conditions of these causal effects and proofs. To estimate these causal effects, we utilize attention mechanisms to distinguish the influences of different neighbors and explore high-order neighbor effects through multi-layer graph neural networks (GNNs). Additionally, to control the dependency between node features and representations, we incorporate the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) into the GNN, fully utilizing the structural information of the graph, to enhance the robustness and accuracy of the model. Extensive experiments on two semi-synthetic datasets confirm the effectiveness of our approach. Our theoretical findings have the potential to improve intervention strategies in networked systems, with applications in areas such as social networks and epidemiology.

9/16/2024

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Steven Wilkins Reeves, Shane Lubold, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Tyler H. McCormick

The stable unit treatment value assumption states that the outcome of an individual is not affected by the treatment statuses of others, however in many real world applications, treatments can have an effect on many others beyond the immediately treated. Interference can generically be thought of as mediated through some network structure. In many empirically relevant situations however, complete network data (required to adjust for these spillover effects) are too costly or logistically infeasible to collect. Partially or indirectly observed network data (e.g., subsamples, aggregated relational data (ARD), egocentric sampling, or respondent-driven sampling) reduce the logistical and financial burden of collecting network data, but the statistical properties of treatment effect adjustments from these design strategies are only beginning to be explored. In this paper, we present a framework for the estimation and inference of treatment effect adjustments using partial network data through the lens of structural causal models. We also illustrate procedures to assign treatments using only partial network data, with the goal of either minimizing estimator variance or optimally seeding. We derive single network asymptotic results applicable to a variety of choices for an underlying graph model. We validate our approach using simulated experiments on observed graphs with applications to information diffusion in India and Malawi.

6/19/2024

🎲

Cascade-based Randomization for Inferring Causal Effects under Diffusion Interference

Zahra Fatemi, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Elena Zheleva

The presence of interference, where the outcome of an individual may depend on the treatment assignment and behavior of neighboring nodes, can lead to biased causal effect estimation. Current approaches to network experiment design focus on limiting interference through cluster-based randomization, in which clusters are identified using graph clustering, and cluster randomization dictates the node assignment to treatment and control. However, cluster-based randomization approaches perform poorly when interference propagates in cascades, whereby the response of individuals to treatment propagates to their multi-hop neighbors. When we have knowledge of the cascade seed nodes, we can leverage this interference structure to mitigate the resulting causal effect estimation bias. With this goal, we propose a cascade-based network experiment design that initiates treatment assignment from the cascade seed node and propagates the assignment to their multi-hop neighbors to limit interference during cascade growth and thereby reduce the overall causal effect estimation error. Our extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms the existing state-of-the-art approaches in estimating causal effects in network data.

5/22/2024