Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI Research

Read original: arXiv:2405.16654 - Published 5/28/2024 by Inha Cha, Ajit G. Pillai, Richmond Y. Wong
Total Score

0

Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI Research

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a design activity called "Ethics Pathways" that aims to help researchers in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) reflect on their engagement with ethics throughout the research process.
  • The activity involves creating a visual representation of the ethical considerations and decisions made during a research project, with the goal of fostering deeper reflection and informing future research practices.
  • The paper describes the design and implementation of the Ethics Pathways activity, as well as insights gained from its use in various HCI research settings.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a design activity called "Ethics Pathways" that is intended to help researchers in the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) think more deeply about the ethical considerations and decisions they make during their research projects. The activity involves creating a visual representation, or "map," of the ethical issues that arise and how the researchers addressed them over the course of the project.

The goal of this activity is to encourage researchers to reflect on their engagement with ethics throughout the research process, rather than just considering ethics as an afterthought or a box to be checked. By mapping out the ethical "pathways" they navigated, researchers can gain a better understanding of the ethical challenges they faced, the decisions they made, and how they can improve their ethical practices in future research.

The paper describes the design and implementation of the Ethics Pathways activity, sharing insights from its use in various HCI research settings. The authors explain how the activity can be a valuable tool for researchers to critically examine their own practices and identify areas for improvement when it comes to addressing ethical concerns in their work.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the "Ethics Pathways" design activity, which aims to help Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) researchers reflect on their engagement with ethics throughout the research process. The activity involves creating a visual "map" or representation of the ethical considerations and decisions made during a research project.

The researchers developed the Ethics Pathways activity based on a review of the existing literature on ethics in HCI research. They recognized the need for a more comprehensive and reflective approach to addressing ethical concerns, beyond the typical "box-ticking" exercises.

The activity consists of several steps:

  1. Mapping the Research Process: Researchers create a visual timeline or diagram of the key stages and milestones in their research project.
  2. Identifying Ethical Touchpoints: Researchers then mark the points in the research process where they encountered ethical considerations or made ethical decisions.
  3. Documenting Ethical Pathways: Researchers describe the ethical issues they faced, the decisions they made, and the reasoning behind those decisions.
  4. Reflecting and Discussing: Researchers engage in discussion and reflection on the ethical pathways they have identified, considering the implications for their research practices.

The paper presents case studies of the Ethics Pathways activity being used in various HCI research settings, including student projects, industry research, and academic collaborations. The insights gained from these case studies suggest that the activity can be a valuable tool for fostering deeper reflection on ethics, identifying areas for improvement, and informing future research practices.

Critical Analysis

The Ethics Pathways design activity presented in this paper offers a promising approach to addressing the complex and often overlooked issue of ethics in HCI research. By encouraging researchers to map out and reflect on their ethical decision-making processes, the activity can help them develop a more nuanced understanding of the ethical challenges they face and the strategies they employ to navigate them.

One potential limitation of the activity is the time and effort required to complete the mapping and documentation process, which may be a barrier for some researchers, especially those working under tight deadlines or resource constraints. Additionally, the effectiveness of the activity may depend on the facilitation skills and the level of engagement from the participants.

Another area for further exploration is the potential for the Ethics Pathways activity to be adapted and applied beyond the HCI research context. The general principles of reflective practice and ethical decision-making could be relevant to a wider range of research and design disciplines, and the activity could be further developed to address ethical concerns in other domains.

Overall, the Ethics Pathways design activity represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to integrate ethics more deeply into the practice of HCI research. By providing a structured and reflective approach to engaging with ethical considerations, the activity has the potential to inform more responsible and socially-conscious research practices in the field.

Conclusion

The "Ethics Pathways" design activity presented in this paper offers a novel approach to helping Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) researchers reflect on their engagement with ethics throughout the research process. By creating a visual representation of the ethical considerations and decisions made during a research project, the activity encourages deeper reflection and can inform more responsible and socially-conscious research practices in the future.

The insights gained from the case studies discussed in the paper suggest that the Ethics Pathways activity can be a valuable tool for HCI researchers, fostering critical examination of their own practices and identifying areas for improvement when it comes to addressing ethical concerns. While the activity may require additional time and effort, its potential to enhance ethical decision-making and promote more thoughtful research practices makes it a worthwhile investment for the HCI community.

As the field of HCI continues to grapple with the ethical implications of the technologies it develops, tools like the Ethics Pathways activity will become increasingly important in guiding researchers to consider the broader societal impact of their work. By embedding ethical reflection into the research process, HCI can strive to create technologies that are not only innovative and effective, but also responsible and beneficial to the individuals and communities they serve.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI Research
Total Score

0

Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI Research

Inha Cha, Ajit G. Pillai, Richmond Y. Wong

This paper introduces Ethics Pathways, a design activity aimed at understanding HCI and design researchers' ethics engagements and flows during their research process. Despite a strong ethical commitment in these fields, challenges persist in grasping the complexity of researchers' engagement with ethics -- practices conducted to operationalize ethics -- in situated institutional contexts. Ethics Pathways, developed through six playtesting sessions, offers a design approach to understanding the complexities of researchers' past ethics engagements in their work. This activity involves four main tasks: recalling ethical incidents; describing stakeholders involved in the situation; recounting their actions or speculative alternatives; and reflection and emotion walk-through. The paper reflects on the role of design decisions and facilitation strategies in achieving these goals. The design activity contributes to the discourse on ethical HCI research by conceptualizing ethics engagement as a part of ongoing research processing, highlighting connections between individual affective experiences, social interactions across power differences, and institutional goals.

Read more

5/28/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Navigating Ethics and Power Dynamics through Participant-Designer Journey Mapping

Leonor Tejo, Paula Alexandra Silva

As Digital Transformation and innovation driven by Information and Communication Technology (ICT) continue to mark the evolution of society, ethics emerges as a central concern not only in terms of the outcomes and implications of technological systems but also throughout the activities carried out through the development of those systems. Power dynamics have been identified as a recurrent ethical challenge in the design and development process. As designers, participants, and project stakeholders engage in the process, potential conflicts, power imbalances, and ethical challenges emerge. This requires that awareness is raised on these imbalances and that teams proactively act on them. To address this issue, we propose the Participant-Designer Journey Map (PDJM), a tool to assist designers in conducting an ethical design process, aware of power imbalances. The proposal for the PDJM was evaluated, based on a set of criteria derived from the literature, by three design professionals, against nine other alternative tools. The PDJM was identified as the tool with the most potential to facilitate a structured approach to navigating ethical dilemmas, particularly those related to power dynamics.

Read more

7/8/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Envisioning Collaborative Futures: Advancing the Frontiers of Embedded Research

Anna R. L. Carter, Kyle Montague, Reem Talhouk, Ana O. Henriques, Hugo Nicolau, Tiffany Knearem, Ceylan Besevli, Firaz Peer, Clara Crivellaro, Sarah Ruller

Participatory design initiatives, especially within the realm of digital civics, are often integrated and co-developed with the very citizens and communities they intend to assist. Digital civics research aims to create positive social change using a variety of digital technologies. These research projects commonly adopt various embedded processes, such as commissioning models cite{dcitizensproj22}. Despite the adoption of this process within a range of domains, there isn't currently a framework for best practices and accountability procedures to ensure we engage with citizens ethically and ensure the sustainability of our projects. This workshop aims to provide a space to start collaboratively constructing a dynamic framework of best practices, laying the groundwork for the future of sustainable embedded research processes. The overarching goal is to foster discussions and share insights that contribute to developing effective practices, ensuring the longevity and impact of participatory digital civics projects.

Read more

7/9/2024

The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters
Total Score

0

The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters

Olumide Adisa, Enio Alterman Blay, Yasaman Asgari, Gabriele Di Bona, Samantha Dies, Ana Maria Jaramillo, Paulo H. Resende, Ana Maria de Sousa Leitao

Complexity science, despite its broad scope and potential impact, has not kept pace with fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology and social sciences in addressing ethical concerns. The field lacks a comprehensive ethical framework, leaving us, as a community, vulnerable to ethical challenges and dilemmas. Other areas have gone through similar experiences and created, with discussions and working groups, their guides, policies and recommendations. Therefore, here we highlight the critical absence of formal guidelines, dedicated ethical committees, and widespread discussions on ethics within the complexity science community. Drawing on insights from the disciplines mentioned earlier, we propose a roadmap to enhance ethical awareness and action. Our recommendations include (i) initiating supportive mechanisms to develop ethical guidelines specific to complex systems research, (ii) creating open-access resources, and (iii) fostering inclusive dialogues to ensure that complexity science can responsibly tackle societal challenges and achieve a more inclusive environment. By initiating this dialogue, we aim to encourage a necessary shift in how ethics is integrated into complexity research, positioning the field to address contemporary challenges more effectively.

Read more

9/4/2024