Navigating Ethics and Power Dynamics through Participant-Designer Journey Mapping

Overview

• The paper discusses the importance of ethics in the design and development of technological systems driven by digital transformation and information and communication technology (ICT).
• Power dynamics are identified as a key ethical challenge that emerges throughout the design and development process.
• The researchers propose the Participant-Designer Journey Map (PDJM) as a tool to help designers navigate these ethical dilemmas, particularly those related to power imbalances.

Plain English Explanation

As our society continues to evolve through digital transformation and innovation driven by information and communication technology (ICT), ethical concerns have become a central focus. These concerns extend beyond just the outcomes and implications of technological systems, but also the activities involved in developing those systems.

One recurring ethical challenge that has been identified is the issue of power dynamics that can arise as designers, participants, and stakeholders engage in the design and development process. These power imbalances can lead to potential conflicts and ethical dilemmas that need to be addressed.

To help designers navigate these ethical challenges, the researchers have proposed a tool called the Participant-Designer Journey Map (PDJM). The PDJM is designed to assist designers in conducting an ethical design process that is aware of and proactively addresses power imbalances.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the Participant-Designer Journey Map (PDJM) as a tool to help designers address ethical challenges, particularly those related to power dynamics, in the design and development process.

The PDJM was evaluated against nine other alternative tools by three design professionals, using a set of criteria derived from the literature. The evaluation found that the PDJM had the most potential to facilitate a structured approach to navigating ethical dilemmas, especially those involving power imbalances.

The PDJM is intended to help designers become more aware of power dynamics and take proactive steps to address them throughout the design and development activities. By using this tool, designers can better identify potential conflicts, power imbalances, and ethical challenges that may arise, and then develop strategies to mitigate these issues.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of the ethical challenges that can emerge during the design and development of technological systems, with a particular focus on power dynamics. The proposed PDJM tool seems promising as a way to help designers navigate these complex ethical dilemmas in a structured and proactive manner.

One potential limitation of the research is that the PDJM was only evaluated by a small sample of three design professionals. While their feedback was positive, a broader evaluation involving a larger and more diverse set of participants would provide more comprehensive insights into the tool's effectiveness and practical application.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms or activities involved in the PDJM process. Further details and examples on how designers can use the tool to identify and address power imbalances would be helpful for practitioners looking to implement it in their own design projects.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the growing importance of ethics in the design and development of technological systems, with a focus on the ethical challenges posed by power dynamics. The proposed Participant-Designer Journey Map (PDJM) tool offers a promising approach to help designers navigate these complex issues in a more structured and proactive manner.

By raising awareness of power imbalances and providing a framework for addressing them, the PDJM has the potential to contribute to the design of value-centered consent interfaces and the identification of ethical concerns throughout the design and development process. As digital transformation and ICT-driven innovation continue to shape our society, tools like the PDJM will become increasingly important for ensuring that ethical considerations are at the forefront of technological development.