Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset

Read original: arXiv:2405.03287 - Published 5/7/2024 by Mehedi Hasan Raju, Dillon J Lohr, Oleg V Komogortsev
Total Score

0

Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper evaluates the use of eye movement biometrics in virtual reality (VR) environments by comparing data collected from VR headsets to data from high-end eye-tracking devices.
  • The researchers aimed to establish a baseline for gaze-driven authentication performance in VR and explore the potential of using deep learning techniques to enhance eye-tracking accuracy.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at using people's eye movements as a way to identify and authenticate them, specifically in virtual reality (VR) settings. The researchers compared data on eye movements collected from VR headsets to data from more advanced, high-end eye-tracking equipment.

The goal was to see how well eye-based authentication could work in VR, and to explore whether using advanced machine learning techniques like deep learning could improve the accuracy of tracking people's eyes in VR environments. This is important because being able to accurately track and identify people's eyes in VR could enable new security and personalization features, like automatically logging users in or customizing the VR experience for each individual.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comparative analysis of eye movement data collected from VR headsets and high-end eye-tracking devices. The researchers used the Establishing Baseline Gaze-driven Authentication Performance in VR dataset, which contains eye movement data from participants completing various tasks in a VR environment.

The analysis looked at metrics like fixation duration, saccade amplitude, and blink rate to characterize the differences between the two data sources. The researchers also explored the potential of using deep learning techniques, as described in Using Deep Learning to Increase Eye Tracking Accuracy in VR, to improve the accuracy of eye-tracking in VR.

Additionally, the paper references related work such as Fixation-based Self-calibration for Eye Tracking in VR and Using Artificial Intelligence Methods to Study Visual Analyzer, which explore other approaches to enhancing eye-tracking in virtual environments.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the differences between eye movement data collected from VR headsets and high-end eye-trackers. However, it acknowledges that the findings may be limited by the specific dataset used, which only included data from a single VR application. Further research would be needed to determine how well the results generalize to other VR applications and settings.

Additionally, while the paper explores the potential of deep learning to improve eye-tracking accuracy, it does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of different deep learning techniques or architectures. There may be opportunities to build on this work and explore more advanced deep learning approaches.

Conclusion

This paper offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of using eye movement biometrics in virtual reality environments. By comparing data from VR headsets and high-end eye-trackers, the researchers have established a baseline for gaze-driven authentication performance in VR and highlighted the potential of deep learning to enhance eye-tracking accuracy.

These findings could inform the development of more secure and personalized VR experiences, as well as inspire further research into advanced techniques for eye-tracking and biometric identification in virtual environments. As VR technology continues to advance, understanding the capabilities and limitations of eye-based biometrics will be increasingly important.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset
Total Score

0

Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset

Mehedi Hasan Raju, Dillon J Lohr, Oleg V Komogortsev

Previous studies have shown that eye movement data recorded at 1000 Hz can be used to authenticate individuals. This study explores the effectiveness of eye movement-based biometrics (EMB) by utilizing data from an eye-tracking (ET)-enabled virtual reality (VR) headset (GazeBaseVR) and compares it to the performance using data from a high-end eye tracker (GazeBase) that has been downsampled to 250 Hz. The research also aims to assess the biometric potential of both binocular and monocular eye movement data. GazeBaseVR dataset achieves an equal error rate (EER) of 1.67% and a false rejection rate (FRR) at 10^-4 false acceptance rate (FAR) of 22.73% in a binocular configuration. This study underscores the biometric viability of data obtained from eye-tracking-enabled VR headset.

Read more

5/7/2024

Establishing a Baseline for Gaze-driven Authentication Performance in VR: A Breadth-First Investigation on a Very Large Dataset
Total Score

0

Establishing a Baseline for Gaze-driven Authentication Performance in VR: A Breadth-First Investigation on a Very Large Dataset

Dillon Lohr, Michael J. Proulx, Oleg Komogortsev

This paper performs the crucial work of establishing a baseline for gaze-driven authentication performance to begin answering fundamental research questions using a very large dataset of gaze recordings from 9202 people with a level of eye tracking (ET) signal quality equivalent to modern consumer-facing virtual reality (VR) platforms. The size of the employed dataset is at least an order-of-magnitude larger than any other dataset from previous related work. Binocular estimates of the optical and visual axes of the eyes and a minimum duration for enrollment and verification are required for our model to achieve a false rejection rate (FRR) of below 3% at a false acceptance rate (FAR) of 1 in 50,000. In terms of identification accuracy which decreases with gallery size, we estimate that our model would fall below chance-level accuracy for gallery sizes of 148,000 or more. Our major findings indicate that gaze authentication can be as accurate as required by the FIDO standard when driven by a state-of-the-art machine learning architecture and a sufficiently large training dataset.

Read more

7/15/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Measuring eye-tracking accuracy and its impact on usability in apple vision pro

Zehao Huang, Gancheng Zhu, Xiaoting Duan, Rong Wang, Yongkai Li, Shuai Zhang, Zhiguo Wang

With built-in eye-tracking cameras, the recently released Apple Vision Pro (AVP) mixed reality (MR) headset features gaze-based interaction, eye image rendering on external screens, and iris recognition for device unlocking. One of the technological advancements of the AVP is its heavy reliance on gaze- and gesture-based interaction. However, limited information is available regarding the technological specifications of the eye-tracking capability of the AVP, and raw gaze data is inaccessible to developers. This study evaluates the eye-tracking accuracy of the AVP with two sets of tests spanning both MR and virtual reality (VR) applications. This study also examines how eye-tracking accuracy relates to user-reported usability. The results revealed an overall eye-tracking accuracy of 1.11{deg} and 0.93{deg} in two testing setups, within a field of view (FOV) of approximately 34{deg} x 18{deg}. The usability and learnability scores of the AVP, measured using the standard System Usability Scale (SUS), were 75.24 and 68.26, respectively. Importantly, no statistically reliable correlation was found between eye-tracking accuracy and usability scores. These results suggest that eye-tracking accuracy is critical for gaze-based interaction, but it is not the sole determinant of user experience in VR/AR.

Read more

8/15/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

Fixation-based Self-calibration for Eye Tracking in VR Headsets

Ryusei Uramune, Sei Ikeda, Hiroki Ishizuka, Osamu Oshiro

This study proposes a novel self-calibration method for eye tracking in a virtual reality (VR) headset. The proposed method is based on the assumptions that the user's viewpoint can freely move and that the points of regard (PoRs) from different viewpoints are distributed within a small area on an object surface during visual fixation. In the method, fixations are first detected from the time-series data of uncalibrated gaze directions using an extension of the I-VDT (velocity and dispersion threshold identification) algorithm to a three-dimensional (3D) scene. Then, the calibration parameters are optimized by minimizing the sum of a dispersion metrics of the PoRs. The proposed method can potentially identify the optimal calibration parameters representing the user-dependent offset from the optical axis to the visual axis without explicit user calibration, image processing, or marker-substitute objects. For the gaze data of 18 participants walking in two VR environments with many occlusions, the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 2.1$^circ$, which was significantly lower than the average offset. Our method is the first self-calibration method with an average error lower than 3$^circ$ in 3D environments. Further, the accuracy of the proposed method can be improved by up to 1.2$^circ$ by refining the fixation detection or optimization algorithm.

Read more

4/24/2024