Measuring eye-tracking accuracy and its impact on usability in apple vision pro

Read original: arXiv:2406.00255 - Published 8/15/2024 by Zehao Huang, Gancheng Zhu, Xiaoting Duan, Rong Wang, Yongkai Li, Shuai Zhang, Zhiguo Wang
Total Score

0

🎯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The Apple Vision Pro (AVP) is a new mixed reality (MR) headset with built-in eye-tracking cameras.
  • The AVP uses gaze-based interaction and eye image rendering on external screens, as well as iris recognition for device unlocking.
  • However, limited information is available about the eye-tracking capabilities of the AVP, and raw gaze data is inaccessible to developers.
  • This study evaluates the eye-tracking accuracy of the AVP in both MR and virtual reality (VR) applications, and examines how eye-tracking accuracy relates to user-reported usability.

Plain English Explanation

The Apple Vision Pro (AVP) is a new mixed reality headset that uses eye-tracking technology to allow users to control the device with their gaze and display eye images on external screens. The headset also uses iris recognition to unlock the device. While the AVP's eye-tracking capabilities are an important feature, details about how accurate the eye-tracking is and how it affects the overall user experience are not widely known.

This study aimed to evaluate the eye-tracking accuracy of the AVP in both mixed reality and virtual reality settings. The researchers also looked at how the eye-tracking accuracy relates to how easy and usable people found the AVP to be.

The key findings were:

  • The AVP's eye-tracking had an overall accuracy of about 1 degree, within a field of view of 34 by 18 degrees.
  • The usability and learnability of the AVP, as measured by standard questionnaires, were rated as relatively high.
  • However, there was no clear relationship between the eye-tracking accuracy and the usability ratings.

This suggests that eye-tracking accuracy is important for gaze-based interaction, but it is not the only factor that determines how good the overall user experience is for virtual and augmented reality devices like the AVP.

Technical Explanation

The study evaluated the eye-tracking accuracy of the Apple Vision Pro (AVP) mixed reality headset using two different testing setups. In the first setup, participants used the AVP in a mixed reality environment, while the second setup involved a virtual reality scenario.

The researchers measured the eye-tracking accuracy by having participants fixate on targets at known locations and calculating the difference between the reported gaze position and the actual target position. The overall eye-tracking accuracy was found to be 1.11 degrees and 0.93 degrees in the two testing setups, within a field of view of approximately 34 degrees by 18 degrees.

In addition, the study examined the usability and learnability of the AVP using the standard System Usability Scale (SUS). The usability and learnability scores were 75.24 and 68.26, respectively, indicating relatively high ratings.

Importantly, the researchers did not find a statistically reliable correlation between the eye-tracking accuracy and the usability scores. This suggests that eye-tracking accuracy is critical for gaze-based interaction, but it is not the sole determinant of user experience in virtual and augmented reality applications.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the eye-tracking capabilities of the Apple Vision Pro (AVP) and how they relate to the overall user experience. However, there are a few caveats and limitations to consider:

  1. The study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, which may not fully capture the nuances of real-world usage scenarios. Further research is needed to understand the eye-tracking performance in more natural environments.

  2. The study only examined a specific set of eye-tracking accuracy metrics and usability measures. There may be other factors, such as user comfort, fatigue, or task-specific performance, that could influence the overall user experience.

  3. The sample size of the study was relatively small, and the participants may not be representative of the broader population of potential AVP users. Larger-scale studies with more diverse participants would be beneficial.

  4. The study did not have access to the raw gaze data from the AVP, which could have provided additional insights into the eye-tracking capabilities and how they are utilized in the device's interaction design.

Despite these limitations, the study offers a valuable starting point for understanding the eye-tracking performance of the AVP and how it relates to user experience. Further research in this area could help inform the design and development of more effective and engaging mixed reality and virtual reality applications.

Conclusion

The Apple Vision Pro (AVP) is a new mixed reality headset that leverages eye-tracking technology for gaze-based interaction, eye image rendering, and device unlocking. This study evaluated the eye-tracking accuracy of the AVP and explored how it relates to user-reported usability.

The results revealed an overall eye-tracking accuracy of around 1 degree within a field of view of 34 by 18 degrees. The usability and learnability of the AVP were also rated relatively high. Importantly, the study found no statistically reliable correlation between eye-tracking accuracy and usability scores, suggesting that eye-tracking performance is critical for gaze-based interaction but is not the sole determinant of the overall user experience in virtual and augmented reality.

These findings have important implications for the design and development of future mixed reality and virtual reality applications, highlighting the need to consider a broader range of factors beyond just eye-tracking accuracy to ensure a positive and engaging user experience.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎯

Total Score

0

Measuring eye-tracking accuracy and its impact on usability in apple vision pro

Zehao Huang, Gancheng Zhu, Xiaoting Duan, Rong Wang, Yongkai Li, Shuai Zhang, Zhiguo Wang

With built-in eye-tracking cameras, the recently released Apple Vision Pro (AVP) mixed reality (MR) headset features gaze-based interaction, eye image rendering on external screens, and iris recognition for device unlocking. One of the technological advancements of the AVP is its heavy reliance on gaze- and gesture-based interaction. However, limited information is available regarding the technological specifications of the eye-tracking capability of the AVP, and raw gaze data is inaccessible to developers. This study evaluates the eye-tracking accuracy of the AVP with two sets of tests spanning both MR and virtual reality (VR) applications. This study also examines how eye-tracking accuracy relates to user-reported usability. The results revealed an overall eye-tracking accuracy of 1.11{deg} and 0.93{deg} in two testing setups, within a field of view (FOV) of approximately 34{deg} x 18{deg}. The usability and learnability scores of the AVP, measured using the standard System Usability Scale (SUS), were 75.24 and 68.26, respectively. Importantly, no statistically reliable correlation was found between eye-tracking accuracy and usability scores. These results suggest that eye-tracking accuracy is critical for gaze-based interaction, but it is not the sole determinant of user experience in VR/AR.

Read more

8/15/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

Fixation-based Self-calibration for Eye Tracking in VR Headsets

Ryusei Uramune, Sei Ikeda, Hiroki Ishizuka, Osamu Oshiro

This study proposes a novel self-calibration method for eye tracking in a virtual reality (VR) headset. The proposed method is based on the assumptions that the user's viewpoint can freely move and that the points of regard (PoRs) from different viewpoints are distributed within a small area on an object surface during visual fixation. In the method, fixations are first detected from the time-series data of uncalibrated gaze directions using an extension of the I-VDT (velocity and dispersion threshold identification) algorithm to a three-dimensional (3D) scene. Then, the calibration parameters are optimized by minimizing the sum of a dispersion metrics of the PoRs. The proposed method can potentially identify the optimal calibration parameters representing the user-dependent offset from the optical axis to the visual axis without explicit user calibration, image processing, or marker-substitute objects. For the gaze data of 18 participants walking in two VR environments with many occlusions, the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 2.1$^circ$, which was significantly lower than the average offset. Our method is the first self-calibration method with an average error lower than 3$^circ$ in 3D environments. Further, the accuracy of the proposed method can be improved by up to 1.2$^circ$ by refining the fixation detection or optimization algorithm.

Read more

4/24/2024

3D Gaze Tracking for Studying Collaborative Interactions in Mixed-Reality Environments
Total Score

0

3D Gaze Tracking for Studying Collaborative Interactions in Mixed-Reality Environments

Eduardo Davalos, Yike Zhang, Ashwin T. S., Joyce H. Fonteles, Umesh Timalsina, Guatam Biswas

This study presents a novel framework for 3D gaze tracking tailored for mixed-reality settings, aimed at enhancing joint attention and collaborative efforts in team-based scenarios. Conventional gaze tracking, often limited by monocular cameras and traditional eye-tracking apparatus, struggles with simultaneous data synchronization and analysis from multiple participants in group contexts. Our proposed framework leverages state-of-the-art computer vision and machine learning techniques to overcome these obstacles, enabling precise 3D gaze estimation without dependence on specialized hardware or complex data fusion. Utilizing facial recognition and deep learning, the framework achieves real-time, tracking of gaze patterns across several individuals, addressing common depth estimation errors, and ensuring spatial and identity consistency within the dataset. Empirical results demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of our method in group environments. This provides mechanisms for significant advances in behavior and interaction analysis in educational and professional training applications in dynamic and unstructured environments.

Read more

6/18/2024

Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset
Total Score

0

Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset

Mehedi Hasan Raju, Dillon J Lohr, Oleg V Komogortsev

Previous studies have shown that eye movement data recorded at 1000 Hz can be used to authenticate individuals. This study explores the effectiveness of eye movement-based biometrics (EMB) by utilizing data from an eye-tracking (ET)-enabled virtual reality (VR) headset (GazeBaseVR) and compares it to the performance using data from a high-end eye tracker (GazeBase) that has been downsampled to 250 Hz. The research also aims to assess the biometric potential of both binocular and monocular eye movement data. GazeBaseVR dataset achieves an equal error rate (EER) of 1.67% and a false rejection rate (FRR) at 10^-4 false acceptance rate (FAR) of 22.73% in a binocular configuration. This study underscores the biometric viability of data obtained from eye-tracking-enabled VR headset.

Read more

5/7/2024