Evaluating Layout Dimensionalities in PC+VR Asymmetric Collaborative Decision Making
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Evaluates layout dimensionalities in asymmetric collaborative decision-making between PC and VR users
- Examines how different layout dimensionalities impact user experience and performance
- Conducted experiments to compare 2D, 2.5D, and 3D layouts in a data analysis task
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how the dimensionality of the layout, or the way information is presented, can affect collaboration between people using a PC and those using virtual reality (VR). In a data analysis task, the researchers compared 2D, 2.5D, and 3D layouts to see how they impact the user experience and performance of the collaborators.
The key idea is that the layout dimensionality - whether information is shown in a flat 2D view, a 2.5D view with some depth, or a fully 3D environment - could influence how well PC and VR users can work together. The researchers wanted to understand the tradeoffs and optimal approaches for this type of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/i-did-not-notice-comparison-immersive-analytics">asymmetric collaboration</a> between different devices and interfaces.
Technical Explanation
The study designed an experiment where pairs of participants, one using a PC and one using VR, worked together on a data analysis task. The task involved exploring and annotating a 3D data visualization. The researchers compared three different layout dimensionalities:
- 2D layout: a flat, top-down view of the data
- 2.5D layout: a view with some depth and perspective
- 3D layout: a fully immersive 3D environment
The participants completed the task and provided feedback on their experiences. The researchers analyzed the collaboration process, task performance, and subjective user ratings to understand the impacts of the different layout dimensionalities.
The results showed that the 2.5D layout struck the best balance, enabling effective collaboration between the PC and VR users. The 3D layout had some advantages, such as improved spatial understanding, but also introduced challenges with coordination and awareness. The 2D layout was the least effective, as it limited the ability of the VR user to fully leverage the benefits of their immersive interface.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of an important issue in <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/practice-informed-patterns-organising-large-groups-distributed">cross-device collaboration</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/spatialtouch-exploring-spatial-data-visualizations-cross-reality">immersive analytics</a>. The experimental design and analysis are sound, and the results offer valuable insights for designers and researchers in this domain.
However, the study is limited to a specific data analysis task and may not generalize to all types of collaborative activities. Additionally, the sample size is relatively small, and the findings could be influenced by individual differences between participants. Further research is needed to validate the results and explore the broader implications.
It would also be interesting to investigate the role of additional factors, such as the level of expertise, familiarity with the tools, and communication modalities, in shaping the collaborative experience across different layout dimensionalities.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to understanding the impact of layout dimensionality on <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/investigating-impact-virtual-element-misalignment-collaborative-augmented">asymmetric collaboration</a> between PC and VR users. The findings suggest that a 2.5D layout, which balances depth and perspective, can facilitate the most effective collaboration in a data analysis task. These insights can inform the design of future cross-device collaboration systems and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/sparc-shared-perspective-avatar-distortion-remote-collaboration">immersive analytics</a> tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluating Layout Dimensionalities in PC+VR Asymmetric Collaborative Decision Making
Daniel Enriquez, Wai Tong, Chris North, Huamin Qu, Yalong Yang
With the commercialization of virtual/augmented reality (VR/AR) devices, there is an increasing interest in combining immersive and non-immersive devices (e.g., desktop computers) for asymmetric collaborations. While such asymmetric settings have been examined in social platforms, significant questions around layout dimensionality in data-driven decision-making remain underexplored. A crucial inquiry arises: although presenting a consistent 3D virtual world on both immersive and non-immersive platforms has been a common practice in social applications, does the same guideline apply to lay out data? Or should data placement be optimized locally according to each device's display capacity? This study aims to provide empirical insights into the user experience of asymmetric collaboration in data-driven decision-making. We tested practical dimensionality combinations between PC and VR, resulting in three conditions: PC2D+VR2D, PC2D+VR3D, and PC3D+VR3D. The results revealed a preference for PC2D+VR3D, and PC2D+VR2D led to the quickest task completion. Our investigation facilitates an in-depth discussion of the trade-offs associated with different layout dimensionalities in asymmetric collaborations.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Investigating the impact of virtual element misalignment in collaborative Augmented Reality experiences
Francesco Vona, Sina Hinzmann, Michael Stern, Tanja Koji'c, Navid Ashrafi, David Grieshammer, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons
The collaboration in co-located shared environments has sparked an increased interest in immersive technologies, including Augmented Reality (AR). Since research in this field has primarily focused on individual user experiences in AR, the collaborative aspects within shared AR spaces remain less explored, and fewer studies can provide guidelines for designing this type of experience. This article investigates how the user experience in a collaborative shared AR space is affected by divergent perceptions of virtual objects and the effects of positional synchrony and avatars. For this purpose, we developed an AR app and used two distinct experimental conditions to study the influencing factors. Forty-eight participants, organized into 24 pairs, participated in the experiment and jointly interacted with shared virtual objects. Results indicate that divergent perceptions of virtual objects did not directly influence communication and collaboration dynamics. Conversely, positional synchrony emerged as a critical factor, significantly enhancing the quality of the collaborative experience. On the contrary, while not negligible, avatars played a relatively less pronounced role in influencing these dynamics. The findings can potentially offer valuable practical insights, guiding the development of future collaborative AR/VR environments.
Read more4/26/2024
0
I Did Not Notice: A Comparison of Immersive Analytics with Augmented and Virtual Reality
Xiaoyan Zhou, Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Adam S. Williams, Dylan Schreiber, Francisco Ortega
Immersive environments enable users to engage in embodied interaction, enhancing the sensemaking processes involved in completing tasks such as immersive analytics. Previous comparative studies on immersive analytics using augmented and virtual realities have revealed that users employ different strategies for data interpretation and text-based analytics depending on the environment. Our study seeks to investigate how augmented and virtual reality influences sensemaking processes in quantitative immersive analytics. Our results, derived from a diverse group of participants, indicate that users demonstrate comparable performance in both environments. However, it was observed that users exhibit a higher tolerance for cognitive load in VR and travel further in AR. Based on our findings, we recommend providing users with the option to switch between AR and VR, thereby enabling them to select an environment that aligns with their preferences and task requirements.
Read more4/8/2024
0
Enhancement of Co-located Shared VR Experiences: Representing Non-HMD Observers on Both HMD and 2D Screen
Zixuan Guo, Wenge Xu, Hongyu Wang, Tingjie Wan, Nilufar Baghaei, Cheng-Hung Lo, Hai-Ning Liang
Virtual reality (VR) not only allows head-mounted display (HMD) users to immerse themselves in virtual worlds but also to share them with others. When designed correctly, this shared experience can be enjoyable. However, in typical scenarios, HMD users are isolated by their devices, and non-HMD observers lack connection with the virtual world. To address this, our research investigates visually representing observers on both HMD and 2D screens to enhance shared experiences. The study, including five representation conditions, reveals that incorporating observer representation positively impacts both HMD users and observers. For how to design and represent them, our work shows that HMD users prefer methods displaying real-world visuals, while observers exhibit diverse preferences regarding being represented with real or virtual images. We provide design guidelines tailored to both displays, offering valuable insights to enhance co-located shared VR experiences for HMD users and non-HMD observers.
Read more8/15/2024