An Evaluation Framework for Attributed Information Retrieval using Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2409.08014 - Published 9/14/2024 by Hanane Djeddal, Pierre Erbacher, Raouf Toukal, Laure Soulier, Karen Pinel-Sauvagnat, Sophia Katrenko, Lynda Tamine
Total Score

0

An Evaluation Framework for Attributed Information Retrieval using Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes an evaluation framework for assessing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in attributed information retrieval tasks.
  • The framework examines how well LLMs can retrieve relevant documents while also considering textual attributes like topic, sentiment, and style.
  • Experiments are conducted on a benchmark dataset to evaluate the framework's effectiveness.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a way to evaluate the performance of large language models when used for information retrieval tasks. Information retrieval is the process of finding relevant documents or information in response to a query.

Traditionally, information retrieval systems have focused on finding documents that are topically relevant to the query. However, in many real-world applications, it's also important to consider other attributes of the documents, such as the sentiment expressed (positive or negative) or the writing style (formal or casual).

The researchers propose a new evaluation framework that assesses how well large language models can retrieve relevant documents while also considering these additional textual attributes. They test their framework on a benchmark dataset and analyze the results to better understand the capabilities and limitations of large language models in this type of information retrieval task.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines an evaluation framework for assessing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in attributed information retrieval tasks. The key elements of the framework include:

  1. Benchmark Dataset: The researchers use a dataset of news articles, where each article is annotated with various textual attributes, such as topic, sentiment, and writing style.

  2. Retrieval Task: The goal is to retrieve relevant documents in response to a given query, while also considering the specified textual attributes.

  3. Evaluation Metrics: The framework uses a combination of traditional information retrieval metrics (e.g., precision, recall) as well as new metrics that capture the model's ability to retrieve documents with the desired attributes.

The researchers conduct experiments using this framework, employing state-of-the-art LLMs as the retrieval models. They analyze the results to gain insights into the strengths and limitations of LLMs in this type of information retrieval task.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed evaluation framework that addresses an important aspect of information retrieval – the need to consider textual attributes beyond just topical relevance. The use of a benchmark dataset with annotated attributes is a valuable contribution, as it allows for a more comprehensive assessment of model performance.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed framework. For example, the researchers could explore how the framework might perform on more diverse or noisy datasets, or how sensitive the results are to the specific choice of textual attributes.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from a deeper discussion of the implications of their findings for the broader field of information retrieval and the use of large language models in this context. Exploring potential real-world applications and the practical challenges that may arise would help readers understand the significance and potential impact of this research.

Conclusion

This paper introduces an innovative evaluation framework for assessing the performance of large language models in attributed information retrieval tasks. By considering textual attributes beyond just topical relevance, the framework provides a more comprehensive way to evaluate the capabilities of these models in real-world applications.

The results of the experiments conducted using this framework offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of large language models in this domain. This research lays the groundwork for further advancements in the field of information retrieval and the effective deployment of large language models in practical settings.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

An Evaluation Framework for Attributed Information Retrieval using Large Language Models
Total Score

0

An Evaluation Framework for Attributed Information Retrieval using Large Language Models

Hanane Djeddal, Pierre Erbacher, Raouf Toukal, Laure Soulier, Karen Pinel-Sauvagnat, Sophia Katrenko, Lynda Tamine

With the growing success of Large Language models (LLMs) in information-seeking scenarios, search engines are now adopting generative approaches to provide answers along with in-line citations as attribution. While existing work focuses mainly on attributed question answering, in this paper, we target information-seeking scenarios which are often more challenging due to the open-ended nature of the queries and the size of the label space in terms of the diversity of candidate-attributed answers per query. We propose a reproducible framework to evaluate and benchmark attributed information seeking, using any backbone LLM, and different architectural designs: (1) Generate (2) Retrieve then Generate, and (3) Generate then Retrieve. Experiments using HAGRID, an attributed information-seeking dataset, show the impact of different scenarios on both the correctness and attributability of answers.

Read more

9/14/2024

Generative Information Retrieval Evaluation
Total Score

0

Generative Information Retrieval Evaluation

Marwah Alaofi, Negar Arabzadeh, Charles L. A. Clarke, Mark Sanderson

This paper is a draft of a chapter intended to appear in a forthcoming book on generative information retrieval, co-edited by Chirag Shah and Ryen White. In this chapter, we consider generative information retrieval evaluation from two distinct but interrelated perspectives. First, large language models (LLMs) themselves are rapidly becoming tools for evaluation, with current research indicating that LLMs may be superior to crowdsource workers and other paid assessors on basic relevance judgement tasks. We review past and ongoing related research, including speculation on the future of shared task initiatives, such as TREC, and a discussion on the continuing need for human assessments. Second, we consider the evaluation of emerging LLM-based generative information retrieval (GenIR) systems, including retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems. We consider approaches that focus both on the end-to-end evaluation of GenIR systems and on the evaluation of a retrieval component as an element in a RAG system. Going forward, we expect the evaluation of GenIR systems to be at least partially based on LLM-based assessment, creating an apparent circularity, with a system seemingly evaluating its own output. We resolve this apparent circularity in two ways: 1) by viewing LLM-based assessment as a form of slow search, where a slower IR system is used for evaluation and training of a faster production IR system; and 2) by recognizing a continuing need to ground evaluation in human assessment, even if the characteristics of that human assessment must change.

Read more

4/17/2024

Total Score

0

Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrieval

Lukas Gienapp, Harrisen Scells, Niklas Deckers, Janek Bevendorff, Shuai Wang, Johannes Kiesel, Shahbaz Syed, Maik Frobe, Guido Zuccon, Benno Stein, Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast

Recent advances in large language models have enabled the development of viable generative retrieval systems. Instead of a traditional document ranking, generative retrieval systems often directly return a grounded generated text as a response to a query. Quantifying the utility of the textual responses is essential for appropriately evaluating such generative ad hoc retrieval. Yet, the established evaluation methodology for ranking-based ad hoc retrieval is not suited for the reliable and reproducible evaluation of generated responses. To lay a foundation for developing new evaluation methods for generative retrieval systems, we survey the relevant literature from the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing, identify search tasks and system architectures in generative retrieval, develop a new user model, and study its operationalization.

Read more

5/24/2024

Total Score

0

Evaluating the Retrieval Component in LLM-Based Question Answering Systems

Ashkan Alinejad, Krtin Kumar, Ali Vahdat

Question answering systems (QA) utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) heavily depend on the retrieval component to provide them with domain-specific information and reduce the risk of generating inaccurate responses or hallucinations. Although the evaluation of retrievers dates back to the early research in Information Retrieval, assessing their performance within LLM-based chatbots remains a challenge. This study proposes a straightforward baseline for evaluating retrievers in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based chatbots. Our findings demonstrate that this evaluation framework provides a better image of how the retriever performs and is more aligned with the overall performance of the QA system. Although conventional metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score may not fully capture LLMs' capabilities - as they can yield accurate responses despite imperfect retrievers - our method considers LLMs' strengths to ignore irrelevant contexts, as well as potential errors and hallucinations in their responses.

Read more

6/11/2024