Attribute or Abstain: Large Language Models as Long Document Assistants

Overview

• This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can be used as assistants for working with long documents, such as research papers or reports.
• The key focus is on the "attribute or abstain" approach, where the LLM can either attribute a given output to a specific section of the input document or abstain from providing an answer if it is not confident.
• The authors investigate this approach across various tasks, including question answering, summarization, and section retrieval, to understand the capabilities and limitations of LLMs for long-form document processing.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this paper looked at how powerful AI language models, known as large language models (LLMs), can be used to help people work with long and complex documents, like research papers or reports.

The main idea they focused on is called "attribute or abstain." This means the language model can either attribute or abstain - it can either try to give an answer to a question about the document, or it can say it's not confident enough to provide an answer. This is an important ability, because we want to make sure the language model is being honest about what it knows and doesn't know, rather than guessing.

The researchers tested this "attribute or abstain" approach across different tasks, like answering questions about the document, summarizing key points, and retrieving relevant sections. This helped them understand the strengths and limitations of using LLMs to assist people with working through long, complex documents, which is an important problem to tackle as these models become more widely used.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) as assistants for working with long documents, such as research papers or reports. The key focus is on the "attribute or abstain" approach, where the LLM can either attribute a given output to a specific section of the input document or abstain from providing an answer if it is not confident.

The authors evaluate this approach across a variety of tasks, including question answering, summarization, and section retrieval. For question answering, the LLM must determine which part of the document the answer is grounded in or abstain if it is not confident. For summarization, the LLM must attribute generated summary sentences to their corresponding document sections or abstain. And for section retrieval, the LLM must identify the most relevant document sections for a given query or abstain.

The experiments show that the "attribute or abstain" approach can help improve the reliability and transparency of LLM-based assistants for long document processing. By allowing the model to abstain, it can avoid making guesses that may be incorrect, which is important for applications where trustworthiness is critical. The results also reveal insights into the strengths and limitations of current LLMs for handling long-form content and suggest directions for further research and development.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of the "attribute or abstain" approach for using large language models (LLMs) as long document assistants. The experimental design and evaluation across multiple tasks are well-executed and yield valuable insights.

One potential limitation highlighted in the paper is the reliance on human-annotated ground truth for evaluating the LLM's performance. While necessary for this type of study, this approach may not fully capture the nuances of how real users would interact with and rely on the system. Further research into more naturalistic evaluation setups could provide additional insights.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific architectural choices or training regimes that may impact the LLM's performance on these tasks. Exploring the model's inner workings and their connection to the observed behaviors could lead to further advancements in the field.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of how LLMs can be leveraged as assistants for long-form document processing. The "attribute or abstain" approach seems promising, and the insights generated by this work can inform the development of more reliable and trustworthy LLM-based tools for a variety of applications.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) as assistants for working with long documents, such as research papers or reports. The key focus is on the "attribute or abstain" approach, where the LLM can either attribute a given output to a specific section of the input document or abstain from providing an answer if it is not confident.

The experiments across various tasks, including question answering, summarization, and section retrieval, demonstrate the potential of this approach to improve the reliability and transparency of LLM-based assistants for long document processing. By allowing the model to abstain when it is uncertain, the system can avoid making potentially incorrect guesses, which is crucial for applications where trustworthiness is critical.

The insights generated by this work can inform the development of more advanced LLM-based tools for handling long-form content and attribute-based generation, ultimately helping humans work more effectively with complex documents and information sources.