An Experimental Design for Anytime-Valid Causal Inference on Multi-Armed Bandits

Read original: arXiv:2311.05794 - Published 6/18/2024 by Biyonka Liang, Iavor Bojinov
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new experimental design called the Mixture Adaptive Design (MAD) for multi-armed bandit (MAB) experiments.
  • MAD allows for continuous inference on the average treatment effect (ATE) between arms as new data arrives, and can determine a data-driven stopping time for the experiment.
  • MAD can be used with any bandit algorithm, even those without probabilistic treatment assignment.
  • MAD is proven to generate anytime-valid asymptotic confidence sequences that shrink around the true ATE, and its regret approaches that of the underlying bandit algorithm over time.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new approach for running multi-armed bandit (MAB) experiments, which are used to test the performance of different "arms" or options in a decision-making task. In these experiments, it's often useful to continuously monitor the average difference in performance between the arms (the average treatment effect or ATE) and decide when to stop the experiment based on the data.

The authors develop a technique called the Mixture Adaptive Design (MAD) that allows for this type of anytime inference on the ATE. MAD works by combining any bandit algorithm of the experimenter's choosing (e.g., a bandit algorithm from this paper) with a simpler "Bernoulli" design that ensures statistical validity.

The key idea is that MAD gradually reduces the influence of the Bernoulli design over time, so that the experiment's performance approaches that of the underlying bandit algorithm. Importantly, the authors prove that this approach provides guaranteed statistical guarantees - specifically, that the confidence intervals for the ATE will converge to the true value in the long run, and that any true non-zero treatment effect will be detected in finite time.

This is a powerful result, as it allows experimenters to use advanced bandit algorithms that may not have built-in statistical properties, while still obtaining reliable inferences. The authors also show through simulations that MAD achieves these inferential benefits without significant losses in the actual rewards collected during the experiment.

Technical Explanation

The key technical innovation of the paper is the Mixture Adaptive Design (MAD), a new experimental design for multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems. Traditionally, MAB experiments have focused on maximizing the cumulative reward (or minimizing regret) collected during the experiment, without providing guarantees on the statistical inference for the average treatment effect (ATE) between arms.

MAD addresses this gap by combining any bandit algorithm of the experimenter's choosing with a Bernoulli design that ensures anytime-valid statistical inference. Specifically, MAD uses a tuning parameter δ_t that gradually decreases the priority placed on the Bernoulli design as the sample size grows. The authors prove that for δ_t = Ω(t^(-1/4)), this approach generates anytime-valid asymptotic confidence sequences that are guaranteed to shrink around the true ATE.

This means that experimenters can use powerful bandit algorithms to maximize rewards, while also being able to continuously monitor and make reliable inferences about the underlying ATE. The authors further show that the regret of the MAD approach approaches that of the underlying bandit algorithm over time, incurring only a small loss in reward in exchange for the strong inferential guarantees.

The authors validate these theoretical results through an extensive simulation study, demonstrating that MAD achieves finite-sample anytime validity and high power without significant losses in finite-sample reward. This makes MAD a promising tool for multi-agent and combinatorial bandit problems where reliable inference is important alongside reward maximization.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong contribution by addressing the tension between reward maximization and statistical inference in multi-armed bandit experiments. The Mixture Adaptive Design (MAD) is a clever approach that allows experimenters to leverage advanced bandit algorithms while still obtaining reliable inferences about the average treatment effect (ATE).

One potential limitation is that the theoretical guarantees for MAD rely on the δ_t tuning parameter decreasing at a specific rate (Ω(t^(-1/4))). In practice, experimenters may need to carefully tune this parameter to balance the tradeoffs between inference and regret minimization. The authors acknowledge this as an area for future research, possibly exploring adaptive tuning approaches that could further improve the practical performance of MAD.

Additionally, the paper focuses on asymptotic guarantees, and the finite-sample performance of MAD, while shown to be promising in simulations, may depend on the specific problem context and the underlying bandit algorithm used. Exploring the robustness of MAD to different problem settings and algorithms could be a fruitful direction for further inquiry.

Overall, the Mixture Adaptive Design represents an important step forward in reconciling the competing objectives of reward maximization and statistical inference in multi-armed bandit experiments. The strong theoretical guarantees and simulation results suggest that MAD could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working in this domain.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the Mixture Adaptive Design (MAD), a new experimental design for multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems that allows for continuous inference on the average treatment effect (ATE) between arms. MAD achieves this by combining any bandit algorithm of the experimenter's choice with a Bernoulli design, gradually reducing the influence of the Bernoulli component over time.

The authors prove that this approach generates anytime-valid asymptotic confidence sequences that converge to the true ATE, and that it incurs only a small loss in regret compared to the underlying bandit algorithm. These powerful theoretical guarantees, along with the simulation results showing strong finite-sample performance, make MAD a promising tool for researchers and practitioners working on multi-armed bandit problems where both reward maximization and reliable statistical inference are important.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

An Experimental Design for Anytime-Valid Causal Inference on Multi-Armed Bandits

Biyonka Liang, Iavor Bojinov

Experimentation is crucial for managers to rigorously quantify the value of a change and determine if it leads to a statistically significant improvement over the status quo, thus augmenting their decision-making. Many companies now mandate that all changes undergo experimentation, presenting two challenges: (1) reducing the risk/cost of experimentation by minimizing the proportion of customers assigned to the inferior treatment and (2) increasing the experimentation velocity by enabling managers to stop experiments as soon as results are statistically significant. This paper simultaneously addresses both challenges by proposing the Mixture Adaptive Design (MAD), a new experimental design for multi-armed bandit (MAB) algorithms that enables anytime valid inference on the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) for any MAB algorithm. Intuitively, the MAB mixes any bandit algorithm with a Bernoulli design such that at each time step, the probability that a customer is assigned via the Bernoulli design is controlled by a user-specified deterministic sequence that can converge to zero. The sequence enables managers to directly and interpretably control the trade-off between regret minimization and inferential precision. Under mild conditions on the rate the sequence converges to zero, we provide a confidence sequence that is asymptotically anytime valid and demonstrate that the MAD is guaranteed to have a finite stopping time in the presence of a true non-zero ATE. Hence, the MAD allows managers to stop experiments early when a significant ATE is detected while ensuring valid inference, enhancing both the efficiency and reliability of adaptive experiments. Empirically, we demonstrate that the MAD achieves finite-sample anytime-validity while accurately and precisely estimating the ATE, all without incurring significant losses in reward compared to standard bandit designs.

Read more

6/18/2024

Multi-Armed Bandits with Interference
Total Score

0

Multi-Armed Bandits with Interference

Su Jia, Peter Frazier, Nathan Kallus

Experimentation with interference poses a significant challenge in contemporary online platforms. Prior research on experimentation with interference has concentrated on the final output of a policy. The cumulative performance, while equally crucial, is less well understood. To address this gap, we introduce the problem of {em Multi-armed Bandits with Interference} (MABI), where the learner assigns an arm to each of $N$ experimental units over a time horizon of $T$ rounds. The reward of each unit in each round depends on the treatments of {em all} units, where the influence of a unit decays in the spatial distance between units. Furthermore, we employ a general setup wherein the reward functions are chosen by an adversary and may vary arbitrarily across rounds and units. We first show that switchback policies achieve an optimal {em expected} regret $tilde O(sqrt T)$ against the best fixed-arm policy. Nonetheless, the regret (as a random variable) for any switchback policy suffers a high variance, as it does not account for $N$. We propose a cluster randomization policy whose regret (i) is optimal in {em expectation} and (ii) admits a high probability bound that vanishes in $N$.

Read more

7/17/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Adversarial Restless Multi-Armed Bandits with Unknown Transitions and Bandit Feedback

Guojun Xiong, Jian Li

Restless multi-armed bandits (RMAB) play a central role in modeling sequential decision making problems under an instantaneous activation constraint that at most B arms can be activated at any decision epoch. Each restless arm is endowed with a state that evolves independently according to a Markov decision process regardless of being activated or not. In this paper, we consider the task of learning in episodic RMAB with unknown transition functions and adversarial rewards, which can change arbitrarily across episodes. Further, we consider a challenging but natural bandit feedback setting that only adversarial rewards of activated arms are revealed to the decision maker (DM). The goal of the DM is to maximize its total adversarial rewards during the learning process while the instantaneous activation constraint must be satisfied in each decision epoch. We develop a novel reinforcement learning algorithm with two key contributors: a novel biased adversarial reward estimator to deal with bandit feedback and unknown transitions, and a low-complexity index policy to satisfy the instantaneous activation constraint. We show $tilde{mathcal{O}}(Hsqrt{T})$ regret bound for our algorithm, where $T$ is the number of episodes and $H$ is the episode length. To our best knowledge, this is the first algorithm to ensure $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{T})$ regret for adversarial RMAB in our considered challenging settings.

Read more

5/3/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Causally Abstracted Multi-armed Bandits

Fabio Massimo Zennaro, Nicholas Bishop, Joel Dyer, Yorgos Felekis, Anisoara Calinescu, Michael Wooldridge, Theodoros Damoulas

Multi-armed bandits (MAB) and causal MABs (CMAB) are established frameworks for decision-making problems. The majority of prior work typically studies and solves individual MAB and CMAB in isolation for a given problem and associated data. However, decision-makers are often faced with multiple related problems and multi-scale observations where joint formulations are needed in order to efficiently exploit the problem structures and data dependencies. Transfer learning for CMABs addresses the situation where models are defined on identical variables, although causal connections may differ. In this work, we extend transfer learning to setups involving CMABs defined on potentially different variables, with varying degrees of granularity, and related via an abstraction map. Formally, we introduce the problem of causally abstracted MABs (CAMABs) by relying on the theory of causal abstraction in order to express a rigorous abstraction map. We propose algorithms to learn in a CAMAB, and study their regret. We illustrate the limitations and the strengths of our algorithms on a real-world scenario related to online advertising.

Read more

7/18/2024