Explainability in JupyterLab and Beyond: Interactive XAI Systems for Integrated and Collaborative Workflows
2404.02081
0
0
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) tools represent a turn to more human-centered and human-in-the-loop AI approaches that emphasize user needs and perspectives in machine learning model development workflows. However, while the majority of ML resources available today are developed for Python computational environments such as JupyterLab and Jupyter Notebook, the same has not been true of interactive XAI systems, which are often still implemented as standalone interfaces. In this paper, we address this mismatch by identifying three design patterns for embedding front-end XAI interfaces into Jupyter, namely: 1) One-way communication from Python to JavaScript, 2) Two-way data synchronization, and 3) Bi-directional callbacks. We also provide an open-source toolkit, bonXAI, that demonstrates how each design pattern might be used to build interactive XAI tools for a Pytorch text classification workflow. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of best practices and open questions. Our aims for this paper are to discuss how interactive XAI tools might be developed for computational notebooks, and how they can better integrate into existing model development workflows to support more collaborative, human-centered AI.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the development of interactive eXplainable AI (XAI) systems that can be integrated into computational notebooks like JupyterLab.
- These systems aim to enhance the explainability and collaborative aspects of AI-driven workflows.
- The research investigates design considerations, technical approaches, and user experiences for such integrated XAI tools.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly powerful and are being used in more and more applications. However, these AI systems can be complex and difficult to understand, making it challenging for users to trust and effectively use them.
The researchers in this paper worked on developing new tools to help make AI systems more "explainable." They created interactive XAI systems that can be integrated into computational notebooks like JupyterLab. These XAI systems allow users to better understand how the AI is making its decisions and to collaborate with the AI in a more transparent way.
The key ideas are to design XAI tools that are seamlessly integrated into the user's existing workflow, making it easier for them to explore and understand the AI's reasoning. This could help build trust in the AI system and allow users to use it more effectively in tasks like data analysis, machine learning model development, and decision-making.
The researchers looked at the design considerations, technical approaches, and user experiences for these integrated XAI tools. For example, they explored ways to visualize the AI's decision-making process and to allow users to interactively explore and interrogate the AI's logic.
Overall, this research aims to make AI systems more transparent and user-friendly, which could have important implications for a wide range of AI-powered applications in fields like healthcare, finance, and scientific research.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the design and development of interactive XAI systems that can be integrated into computational notebooks like JupyterLab. The researchers focused on enhancing the explainability and collaborative aspects of AI-driven workflows.
The key technical elements include:
-
System Architecture: The XAI systems are designed as modular components that can be easily integrated into notebook environments. This allows for seamless integration with existing user workflows and tools.
-
Explainability Techniques: The researchers explored various XAI techniques, such as feature importance analysis, example-based explanations, and counterfactual explanations. These methods are used to provide users with insights into how the AI models are making decisions.
-
Interactive Visualizations: The XAI systems incorporate interactive visualizations that allow users to explore and interrogate the AI's reasoning. This includes visualizations of model inputs, outputs, and intermediate representations.
-
Collaborative Capabilities: The XAI tools enable collaborative workflows, where users can share insights, annotate explanations, and work together to refine and improve the AI systems.
-
User Experience Design: The researchers carefully considered the user experience, aiming to make the XAI tools intuitive and easy to use, while still providing powerful explainability features.
Through extensive user studies, the researchers evaluated the effectiveness of their integrated XAI systems in enhancing user trust, understanding, and collaborative capabilities when working with AI-powered applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive approach to developing integrated XAI systems, addressing important challenges in making AI systems more explainable and collaborative. The researchers have carefully considered both the technical aspects and the user experience, which is crucial for the adoption and effective use of such tools.
One potential limitation of the research is the focus on computational notebooks, which may not capture the full range of AI-driven workflows in various domains. It would be interesting to see how the proposed XAI systems could be adapted and integrated into other types of software tools and user interfaces.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific XAI techniques used, nor does it provide a comparative analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. Further research could explore the tradeoffs and suitability of different XAI methods for different types of AI models and use cases.
Another area for further exploration is the long-term impact of these integrated XAI systems on user trust, decision-making, and collaboration. Longitudinal studies could shed light on the sustained benefits and potential challenges that may arise as these tools become more widely adopted.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step towards making AI systems more transparent and user-friendly, which could have significant implications for a wide range of AI-powered applications and industries.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel approach to developing interactive XAI systems that can be seamlessly integrated into computational notebooks like JupyterLab. These integrated XAI tools aim to enhance the explainability and collaborative aspects of AI-driven workflows, addressing key challenges in building trust and understanding in AI systems.
The technical advances and user-centric design considerations outlined in the research demonstrate the potential for these integrated XAI systems to transform the way users interact with and make use of AI-powered applications. As AI becomes increasingly ubiquitous, this work represents an important contribution towards making these technologies more transparent, accessible, and trustworthy for a wide range of users and domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024
Interaction as Explanation: A User Interaction-based Method for Explaining Image Classification Models
Hyeonggeun Yun
0
0
In computer vision, explainable AI (xAI) methods seek to mitigate the 'black-box' problem by making the decision-making process of deep learning models more interpretable and transparent. Traditional xAI methods concentrate on visualizing input features that influence model predictions, providing insights primarily suited for experts. In this work, we present an interaction-based xAI method that enhances user comprehension of image classification models through their interaction. Thus, we developed a web-based prototype allowing users to modify images via painting and erasing, thereby observing changes in classification results. Our approach enables users to discern critical features influencing the model's decision-making process, aligning their mental models with the model's logic. Experiments conducted with five images demonstrate the potential of the method to reveal feature importance through user interaction. Our work contributes a novel perspective to xAI by centering on end-user engagement and understanding, paving the way for more intuitive and accessible explainability in AI systems.
4/16/2024
Transferring Domain Knowledge with (X)AI-Based Learning Systems
Philipp Spitzer, Niklas Kuhl, Marc Goutier, Manuel Kaschura, Gerhard Satzger
0
0
In numerous high-stakes domains, training novices via conventional learning systems does not suffice. To impart tacit knowledge, experts' hands-on guidance is imperative. However, training novices by experts is costly and time-consuming, increasing the need for alternatives. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has conventionally been used to make black-box artificial intelligence systems interpretable. In this work, we utilize XAI as an alternative: An (X)AI system is trained on experts' past decisions and is then employed to teach novices by providing examples coupled with explanations. In a study with 249 participants, we measure the effectiveness of such an approach for a classification task. We show that (X)AI-based learning systems are able to induce learning in novices and that their cognitive styles moderate learning. Thus, we take the first steps to reveal the impact of XAI on human learning and point AI developers to future options to tailor the design of (X)AI-based learning systems.
6/4/2024
Improving Health Professionals' Onboarding with AI and XAI for Trustworthy Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making
Min Hun Lee, Silvana Xin Yi Choo, Shamala D/O Thilarajah
0
0
With advanced AI/ML, there has been growing research on explainable AI (XAI) and studies on how humans interact with AI and XAI for effective human-AI collaborative decision-making. However, we still have a lack of understanding of how AI systems and XAI should be first presented to users without technical backgrounds. In this paper, we present the findings of semi-structured interviews with health professionals (n=12) and students (n=4) majoring in medicine and health to study how to improve onboarding with AI and XAI. For the interviews, we built upon human-AI interaction guidelines to create onboarding materials of an AI system for stroke rehabilitation assessment and AI explanations and introduce them to the participants. Our findings reveal that beyond presenting traditional performance metrics on AI, participants desired benchmark information, the practical benefits of AI, and interaction trials to better contextualize AI performance, and refine the objectives and performance of AI. Based on these findings, we highlight directions for improving onboarding with AI and XAI and human-AI collaborative decision-making.
5/28/2024