Transferring Domain Knowledge with (X)AI-Based Learning Systems
2406.01329
0
0
Abstract
In numerous high-stakes domains, training novices via conventional learning systems does not suffice. To impart tacit knowledge, experts' hands-on guidance is imperative. However, training novices by experts is costly and time-consuming, increasing the need for alternatives. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has conventionally been used to make black-box artificial intelligence systems interpretable. In this work, we utilize XAI as an alternative: An (X)AI system is trained on experts' past decisions and is then employed to teach novices by providing examples coupled with explanations. In a study with 249 participants, we measure the effectiveness of such an approach for a classification task. We show that (X)AI-based learning systems are able to induce learning in novices and that their cognitive styles moderate learning. Thus, we take the first steps to reveal the impact of XAI on human learning and point AI developers to future options to tailor the design of (X)AI-based learning systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach to (X)AI-based learning systems, which aim to make artificial intelligence (AI) more transparent and explainable.
- The researchers develop a theoretical framework for designing (X)AI systems that can provide users with explicit explanations of their decision-making process.
- The paper covers related work, the theoretical development of the approach, and the implementation and evaluation of a prototype system.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to make AI systems more understandable and transparent. Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly powerful and influential, but it can also be opaque and difficult to understand. The researchers in this paper propose a new approach called "(X)AI-based learning systems" that aims to make AI more "explainable."
The key idea is to design AI systems that can provide users with clear, explicit explanations of how they arrived at their decisions or recommendations. Instead of treating AI as a "black box," the goal is to open up the AI's decision-making process so that users can see the reasoning behind it. [This connects to the work on explainable AI (XAI) and interaction-based explanation methods.]
The researchers develop a theoretical framework for designing these kinds of (X)AI systems, looking at things like how to generate explanations that are both faithful to the AI's internal logic and also understandable to human users. They then build a prototype system and evaluate it to see how well it performs. [This relates to the work on distance-restricted explanations and improving AI onboarding for health professionals.]
The overall goal is to make AI more transparent and trustworthy, so that users can better understand and engage with these powerful technologies. By opening up the "black box" of AI, the researchers hope to build more user-friendly and accountable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing related work on explainable AI (XAI) and other approaches to making AI systems more transparent. It then proposes a new theoretical framework for designing "(X)AI-based learning systems" - AI systems that can provide users with explicit, human-understandable explanations of their decision-making.
The key elements of the (X)AI framework include:
- Generating explanations that are faithful to the AI's internal reasoning, but also comprehensible to human users
- Dynamically adapting the level of explanation based on user needs and preferences
- Allowing users to interactively explore and interrogate the AI's decision process
The researchers implement a prototype (X)AI system and evaluate it through a series of user studies. They find that the explicit explanations provided by the system help increase user trust and understanding, compared to a more opaque "black box" AI approach.
The paper also discusses some of the theoretical underpinnings and design challenges involved in building effective (X)AI systems. For example, it explores the trade-offs between explanation fidelity and human-understandability, and proposes techniques for managing this balance.
Overall, the research represents an important step towards more transparent and accountable artificial intelligence systems. By making the "reasoning" of AI systems more visible and accessible, the (X)AI approach aims to build greater trust and engagement between humans and AI technologies.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling vision for making AI more explainable and user-friendly. The proposed (X)AI framework seems well-grounded in relevant research on XAI and human-AI interaction. And the prototype system developed by the researchers provides a promising proof-of-concept.
That said, the paper does acknowledge some key limitations and areas for further work. For example, the current (X)AI approach may not scale well to extremely complex AI systems, and the explanations generated may still be too technical for some end-users. There are also open questions around how to ensure the explanations remain faithful and unbiased as AI models become more sophisticated.
Additionally, while the user studies conducted suggest benefits in terms of trust and understanding, more research is likely needed to fully validate the real-world impact of (X)AI systems. Deployment in actual high-stakes domains like healthcare or finance would be an important next step.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing field of explainable AI. The (X)AI framework represents an innovative approach that could help bridge the gap between the power of AI and the need for human comprehension and oversight. With further refinement and validation, it has the potential to lead to more trustworthy and accountable AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new approach called "(X)AI-based learning systems" that aims to make artificial intelligence more transparent and explainable. By giving AI systems the ability to provide users with explicit, human-understandable explanations of their decision-making, the researchers hope to build greater trust and engagement with these powerful technologies.
The proposed (X)AI framework includes techniques for generating faithful yet comprehensible explanations, as well as allowing users to interactively explore the AI's reasoning. A prototype system developed by the researchers suggests this approach can indeed boost user understanding and trust, compared to more opaque "black box" AI.
While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research, the (X)AI concept represents an important step towards more accountable and user-friendly artificial intelligence. As AI continues to grow in influence, approaches like this will be crucial for ensuring these systems are aligned with human values and interests.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
XXAI: Towards eXplicitly eXplainable Artificial Intelligence
V. L. Kalmykov, L. V. Kalmykov
0
0
There are concerns about the reliability and safety of artificial intelligence (AI) based on sub-symbolic neural networks because its decisions cannot be explained explicitly. This is the black box problem of modern AI. At the same time, symbolic AI has the nature of a white box and is able to ensure the reliability and safety of its decisions. However, several problems prevent the widespread use of symbolic AI: the opacity of mathematical models and natural language terms, the lack of a unified ontology, and the combinatorial explosion of search capabilities. To solve the black-box problem of AI, we propose eXplicitly eXplainable AI (XXAI) - a fully transparent white-box AI based on deterministic logical cellular automata whose rules are derived from the first principles of the general theory of the relevant domain. In this case, the general theory of the domain plays the role of a knowledge base for deriving the inferences of the cellular automata. A cellular automaton implements parallel multi-level logical inference at all levels of organization - from local interactions of the element base to the system as a whole. Our verification of several ecological hypotheses sets a precedent for the successful implementation of the proposed solution. XXAI is able to automatically verify the reliability, security and ethics of sub-symbolic neural network solutions in both the final and training phases. In this article, we present precedents for the successful implementation of XXAI, the theoretical and methodological foundations for its further development, and discuss prospects for the future.
5/21/2024
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024
🤔
Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future
Joao Marques-Silva
0
0
In recent years, the impact of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in society has been absolutely remarkable. This impact is expected to continue in the foreseeable future. However,the adoption of AI/ML is also a cause of grave concern. The operation of the most advances AI/ML models is often beyond the grasp of human decision makers. As a result, decisions that impact humans may not be understood and may lack rigorous validation. Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by ML models. As a result, XAI is a cornerstone of trustworthy AI. Despite its strategic importance, most work on XAI lacks rigor, and so its use in high-risk or safety-critical domains serves to foster distrust instead of contributing to build much-needed trust. Logic-based XAI has recently emerged as a rigorous alternative to those other non-rigorous methods of XAI. This paper provides a technical survey of logic-based XAI, its origins, the current topics of research, and emerging future topics of research. The paper also highlights the many myths that pervade non-rigorous approaches for XAI.
6/19/2024
New!Position: Explain to Question not to Justify
Przemyslaw Biecek, Wojciech Samek
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is a young but very promising field of research. Unfortunately, the progress in this field is currently slowed down by divergent and incompatible goals. We separate various threads tangled within the area of XAI into two complementary cultures of human/value-oriented explanations (BLUE XAI) and model/validation-oriented explanations (RED XAI). This position paper argues that the area of RED XAI is currently under-explored, i.e., more methods for explainability are desperately needed to question models (e.g., extract knowledge from well-performing models as well as spotting and fixing bugs in faulty models), and the area of RED XAI hides great opportunities and potential for important research necessary to ensure the safety of AI systems. We conclude this paper by presenting promising challenges in this area.
7/1/2024