Problem space structural adversarial attacks for Network Intrusion Detection Systems based on Graph Neural Networks
2403.11830
0
0
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have become increasingly popular for supporting Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). Nevertheless, extensive research has shown their vulnerability to adversarial attacks, which involve subtle perturbations to the inputs of the models aimed at compromising their performance. Recent proposals have effectively leveraged Graph Neural Networks (GNN) to produce predictions based also on the structural patterns exhibited by intrusions to enhance the detection robustness. However, the adoption of GNN-based NIDS introduces new types of risks. In this paper, we propose the first formalization of adversarial attacks specifically tailored for GNN in network intrusion detection. Moreover, we outline and model the problem space constraints that attackers need to consider to carry out feasible structural attacks in real-world scenarios. As a final contribution, we conduct an extensive experimental campaign in which we launch the proposed attacks against state-of-the-art GNN-based NIDS. Our findings demonstrate the increased robustness of the models against classical feature-based adversarial attacks, while highlighting their susceptibility to structure-based attacks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the problem of structural adversarial attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).
- The researchers investigate how attackers can manipulate the structure of network traffic data to evade detection by GNN-based NIDS.
- They propose a problem space attack framework that generates adversarial examples by perturbing the graph structure without changing the node/edge features.
- The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these attacks in fooling state-of-the-art GNN-based NIDS models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a type of cyberattack called a "structural adversarial attack" against network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) that use a specialized machine learning technique called Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).
GNNs are used to analyze the structure and connections of network traffic data, which can help identify potential cyber threats. However, the researchers show that attackers can manipulate the structure of this network data in a way that fools the GNN-based NIDS into misclassifying malicious traffic as normal.
Specifically, the attackers don't change the actual content or features of the network data, but rather make subtle tweaks to how the data is connected and structured. This "problem space" attack framework allows the attackers to bypass the NIDS without having to directly alter the data itself.
The experiments demonstrate that these structural attacks can be highly effective at evading state-of-the-art GNN-based NIDS models. This highlights a potential vulnerability in using GNNs for network security, and the need for more robust defenses against this type of adversarial attack.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "problem space" structural adversarial attack framework for evading Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). The key idea is to manipulate the graph structure of network traffic data without changing the node/edge features, in order to fool the GNN-based NIDS models.
The authors first provide background on how GNNs have been used to enhance NIDS by capturing the relational and topological information in network data. They then outline their proposed attack framework, which generates adversarial examples by perturbing the graph structure through node/edge additions and deletions.
The experimental evaluation is conducted on two state-of-the-art GNN-based NIDS models - AGCN and M-GCN - using real-world network traffic datasets. The results demonstrate that the proposed structural attacks can significantly degrade the performance of these GNN-based NIDS, with high attack success rates.
The authors also analyze the cascading effects of these attacks on the broader network environment, as shown in this related work. Furthermore, they discuss the practical feasibility of implementing such structural attacks, as explored in this prior study.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of the vulnerability of GNN-based NIDS to structural adversarial attacks. By exploiting the reliance of GNNs on graph structure, the proposed attack framework can effectively evade detection without needing to alter the actual network traffic data.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential countermeasures or defense strategies against such attacks. It would be valuable to see further research on formal verification approaches for GCNs or other techniques to enhance the robustness of GNN-based NIDS.
Additionally, the paper focuses solely on the evasion aspect of the attacks, without examining the potential wider implications or cascading effects on the broader network environment. Exploring these additional dimensions could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the security risks posed by structural adversarial attacks.
Overall, the paper makes an important contribution by highlighting a significant vulnerability in GNN-based NIDS and the need for more robust defenses against this type of adversarial attack.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a problem space structural adversarial attack framework that can effectively evade Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). By manipulating the graph structure of network traffic data without changing the node/edge features, the proposed attacks can significantly degrade the performance of state-of-the-art GNN-based NIDS models.
The findings of this research underscore the need for further advancements in the security and robustness of GNN-based network security systems. Developing effective countermeasures and defense strategies against these types of structural adversarial attacks will be crucial for ensuring the reliable and trustworthy deployment of GNNs in critical network infrastructure.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐ง
Efficient Model-Stealing Attacks Against Inductive Graph Neural Networks
Marcin Podhajski, Jan Dubi'nski, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic, Agnieszka Pregowska, Tomasz Michalak
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are recognized as potent tools for processing real-world data organized in graph structures. Especially inductive GNNs, which enable the processing of graph-structured data without relying on predefined graph structures, are gaining importance in an increasingly wide variety of applications. As these networks demonstrate proficiency across a range of tasks, they become lucrative targets for model-stealing attacks where an adversary seeks to replicate the functionality of the targeted network. A large effort has been made to develop model-stealing attacks that focus on models trained with images and texts. However, little attention has been paid to GNNs trained on graph data. This paper introduces a novel method for unsupervised model-stealing attacks against inductive GNNs, based on graph contrasting learning and spectral graph augmentations to efficiently extract information from the target model. The proposed attack is thoroughly evaluated on six datasets. The results show that this approach demonstrates a higher level of efficiency compared to existing stealing attacks. More concretely, our attack outperforms the baseline on all benchmarks achieving higher fidelity and downstream accuracy of the stolen model while requiring fewer queries sent to the target model.
6/6/2024
Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks
Tao Wu, Canyixing Cui, Xingping Xian, Shaojie Qiao, Chao Wang, Lin Yuan, Shui Yu
0
0
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved tremendous success, but recent studies have shown that GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which significantly hinders their use in safety-critical scenarios. Therefore, the design of robust GNNs has attracted increasing attention. However, existing research has mainly been conducted via experimental trial and error, and thus far, there remains a lack of a comprehensive understanding of the vulnerability of GNNs. To address this limitation, we systematically investigate the adversarial robustness of GNNs by considering graph data patterns, model-specific factors, and the transferability of adversarial examples. Through extensive experiments, a set of principled guidelines is obtained for improving the adversarial robustness of GNNs, for example: (i) rather than highly regular graphs, the training graph data with diverse structural patterns is crucial for model robustness, which is consistent with the concept of adversarial training; (ii) the large model capacity of GNNs with sufficient training data has a positive effect on model robustness, and only a small percentage of neurons in GNNs are affected by adversarial attacks; (iii) adversarial transfer is not symmetric and the adversarial examples produced by the small-capacity model have stronger adversarial transferability. This work illuminates the vulnerabilities of GNNs and opens many promising avenues for designing robust GNNs.
6/21/2024
๐
IDEA: Invariant Defense for Graph Adversarial Robustness
Shuchang Tao, Qi Cao, Huawei Shen, Yunfan Wu, Bingbing Xu, Xueqi Cheng
0
0
Despite the success of graph neural networks (GNNs), their vulnerability to adversarial attacks poses tremendous challenges for practical applications. Existing defense methods suffer from severe performance decline under unseen attacks, due to either limited observed adversarial examples or pre-defined heuristics. To address these limitations, we analyze the causalities in graph adversarial attacks and conclude that causal features are key to achieve graph adversarial robustness, owing to their determinedness for labels and invariance across attacks. To learn these causal features, we innovatively propose an Invariant causal DEfense method against adversarial Attacks (IDEA). We derive node-based and structure-based invariance objectives from an information-theoretic perspective. IDEA ensures strong predictability for labels and invariant predictability across attacks, which is provably a causally invariant defense across various attacks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IDEA attains state-of-the-art defense performance under all five attacks on all five datasets. The implementation of IDEA is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/IDEA.
4/26/2024
๐งช
Adversarial Evasion Attacks Practicality in Networks: Testing the Impact of Dynamic Learning
Mohamed el Shehaby, Ashraf Matrawy
0
0
Machine Learning (ML) has become ubiquitous, and its deployment in Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) is inevitable due to its automated nature and high accuracy compared to traditional models in processing and classifying large volumes of data. However, ML has been found to have several flaws, most importantly, adversarial attacks, which aim to trick ML models into producing faulty predictions. While most adversarial attack research focuses on computer vision datasets, recent studies have explored the suitability of these attacks against ML-based network security entities, especially NIDS, due to the wide difference between different domains regarding the generation of adversarial attacks. To further explore the practicality of adversarial attacks against ML-based NIDS in-depth, this paper presents three distinct contributions: identifying numerous practicality issues for evasion adversarial attacks on ML-NIDS using an attack tree threat model, introducing a taxonomy of practicality issues associated with adversarial attacks against ML-based NIDS, and investigating how the dynamicity of some real-world ML models affects adversarial attacks against NIDS. Our experiments indicate that continuous re-training, even without adversarial training, can reduce the effectiveness of adversarial attacks. While adversarial attacks can compromise ML-based NIDSs, our aim is to highlight the significant gap between research and real-world practicality in this domain, warranting attention.
4/5/2024