Explaining Probabilistic Models with Distributional Values

Overview

• This paper addresses a gap between what machine learning models explain (e.g., the scalar probability of a class) and what users wish to understand (e.g., the output of a classifier).
• The authors generalize cooperative game theory and value operators to introduce "distributional values" - random variables that track changes in model output (e.g., flipping of the predicted class).
• They derive analytical expressions for distributional values for models with Gaussian, Bernoulli, and Categorical payoffs, and show that their framework provides fine-grained and insightful explanations.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models can be complex and opaque, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their predictions. A large branch of explainable AI aims to address this issue using game theory concepts. However, the authors argue that game-theoretic explanations may sometimes be misleading or hard to interpret.

The key problem is that current explanation methods, such as SHAP, tend to explain the scalar probability of a class, rather than the actual output of the classifier that the user cares about. To bridge this gap, the authors introduce the concept of "distributional values" - random variables that track changes in the model's output, like the flipping of the predicted class.

The authors derive analytical expressions for distributional values for different types of models, such as those with Gaussian, Bernoulli, or Categorical outputs. They show that this approach provides more detailed and insightful explanations, which can be helpful for understanding the behavior of complex machine learning models, especially in domains like computer vision and natural language processing.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework for explaining the outputs of probabilistic machine learning models using a generalization of cooperative game theory. The authors introduce the concept of "distributional values" - random variables that track changes in the model's output, such as the flipping of the predicted class.

The key innovation is the derivation of analytical expressions for distributional values in the context of games with Gaussian, Bernoulli, and Categorical payoffs. This allows the framework to provide fine-grained explanations that go beyond the scalar probabilities typically explained by methods like SHAP.

The authors establish several characterizing properties of their distributional values and demonstrate the utility of their approach through case studies on vision and language models. The framework is shown to offer insightful explanations that can help users better understand the behavior of complex machine learning systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the limitations of current game-theoretic explanation methods and the need for a more nuanced approach that can capture changes in model outputs. The authors' proposed framework for distributional values appears to be a promising step in this direction.

However, the paper does not address potential drawbacks or challenges in implementing this framework. For example, the analytical expressions derived for different model types may become intractable for large, complex models, limiting their practical applicability. Additionally, the interpretability and usefulness of the distributional value explanations for end-users may vary depending on the specific application and user needs.

Further research is needed to explore the trade-offs between the level of detail provided by the distributional values and the cognitive burden on users. There may also be opportunities to combine this approach with other explanation techniques to provide a more comprehensive understanding of model behavior.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for explaining the outputs of probabilistic machine learning models using a generalization of cooperative game theory. By introducing the concept of "distributional values" - random variables that track changes in model outputs - the authors aim to bridge the gap between what current explanation methods provide and what users actually wish to understand.

The analytical expressions derived for distributional values in different model types, such as Gaussian, Bernoulli, and Categorical, demonstrate the potential of this approach to offer fine-grained and insightful explanations. While further research is needed to address practical challenges and user needs, this work represents an important step forward in the field of explainable AI.