Explaining time series models using frequency masking

Read original: arXiv:2406.13584 - Published 6/21/2024 by Thea Brusch, Kristoffer K. Wickstr{o}m, Mikkel N. Schmidt, Tommy S. Alstr{o}m, Robert Jenssen
Total Score

0

Explaining time series models using frequency masking

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel approach called "frequency masking" for explaining the predictions of time series models.
  • The method involves selectively masking different frequency components of the input time series to understand their impact on the model's predictions.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several time series classification tasks and compare it to other popular explainability techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Time series models are a type of machine learning model used to make predictions based on sequential data over time, such as stock prices, weather patterns, or sensor readings. However, it can be challenging to understand how these models make their predictions, which makes it difficult to trust and use them effectively.

The frequency masking approach introduced in this paper provides a way to "peek under the hood" of time series models and see which parts of the input data are most important for their predictions. By selectively hiding or "masking" different frequency components of the input time series, the researchers can observe how the model's output changes, revealing which frequencies are most critical for the model's decision-making.

This method builds on the idea of attention-based explanations, which have been used to explain other types of machine learning models. By focusing on the frequency domain rather than the time domain, the authors are able to provide insights that are more intuitive and interpretable for time series data.

The frequency masking approach can help users understand why a time series model made a particular prediction, which can lead to greater trust and more effective use of the model. It can also help model developers identify areas for improvement or refinement, ultimately leading to more transparent and explainable AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The core idea behind the frequency masking approach is to selectively remove or "mask" different frequency components of the input time series and observe how this affects the model's predictions. The authors first transform the input time series data into the frequency domain using a Fourier transform. They then create a series of masked versions of the input, each with a different set of frequency components removed.

These masked inputs are fed into the time series model, and the changes in the model's output are analyzed to determine which frequency components are most important for the model's decision-making. The authors use this information to generate frequency-based explanations that provide insights into the model's inner workings.

The authors evaluate their frequency masking approach on several time series classification tasks, including prediction of electricity demand, traffic flow, and human activity recognition. They compare the performance of their method to other popular explainability techniques, such as permutation importance and SHAP, and demonstrate that their approach provides more intuitive and informative explanations for time series models.

Critical Analysis

The frequency masking approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards more interpretable and explainable time series models. By focusing on the frequency domain, the authors are able to provide insights that are more aligned with how humans naturally think about and understand time series data.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the method may be sensitive to the choice of Fourier transform parameters, such as the window size and overlap, which could affect the resulting explanations. Additionally, the approach may be less effective for time series with complex, non-stationary patterns that cannot be easily represented in the frequency domain.

Further research is needed to explore the robustness and generalizability of the frequency masking approach, as well as to investigate potential extensions or combinations with other explainability techniques. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of explainable AI for time series data.

Conclusion

The frequency masking approach introduced in this paper provides a novel way to explain the predictions of time series models by selectively masking different frequency components of the input data. This method can help users better understand how these models work, leading to greater trust and more effective use of time series forecasting and classification systems.

By focusing on the frequency domain, the frequency masking approach offers insights that are more intuitive and interpretable for time series data, which is a significant advancement over traditional explainability techniques. This research represents an important step towards creating more transparent and explainable AI systems that can be trusted and effectively deployed in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Explaining time series models using frequency masking
Total Score

0

Explaining time series models using frequency masking

Thea Brusch, Kristoffer K. Wickstr{o}m, Mikkel N. Schmidt, Tommy S. Alstr{o}m, Robert Jenssen

Time series data is fundamentally important for describing many critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and climate, where explainable models are necessary for safe automated decision-making. To develop eXplainable AI (XAI) in these domains therefore implies explaining salient information in the time series. Current methods for obtaining saliency maps assumes localized information in the raw input space. In this paper, we argue that the salient information of a number of time series is more likely to be localized in the frequency domain. We propose FreqRISE, which uses masking based methods to produce explanations in the frequency and time-frequency domain, which shows the best performance across a number of tasks.

Read more

6/21/2024

Explanation Space: A New Perspective into Time Series Interpretability
Total Score

0

Explanation Space: A New Perspective into Time Series Interpretability

Shahbaz Rezaei, Xin Liu

Human understandable explanation of deep learning models is necessary for many critical and sensitive applications. Unlike image or tabular data where the importance of each input feature (for the classifier's decision) can be directly projected into the input, time series distinguishable features (e.g. dominant frequency) are often hard to manifest in time domain for a user to easily understand. Moreover, most explanation methods require a baseline value as an indication of the absence of any feature. However, the notion of lack of feature, which is often defined as black pixels for vision tasks or zero/mean values for tabular data, is not well-defined in time series. Despite the adoption of explainable AI methods (XAI) from tabular and vision domain into time series domain, these differences limit the application of these XAI methods in practice. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective method that allows a model originally trained on time domain to be interpreted in other explanation spaces using existing methods. We suggest four explanation spaces that each can potentially alleviate these issues in certain types of time series. Our method can be readily adopted in existing platforms without any change to trained models or XAI methods. The code is available at https://github.com/shrezaei/TS-X-spaces.

Read more

9/6/2024

Time is Not Enough: Time-Frequency based Explanation for Time-Series Black-Box Models
Total Score

0

Time is Not Enough: Time-Frequency based Explanation for Time-Series Black-Box Models

Hyunseung Chung, Sumin Jo, Yeonsu Kwon, Edward Choi

Despite the massive attention given to time-series explanations due to their extensive applications, a notable limitation in existing approaches is their primary reliance on the time-domain. This overlooks the inherent characteristic of time-series data containing both time and frequency features. In this work, we present Spectral eXplanation (SpectralX), an XAI framework that provides time-frequency explanations for time-series black-box classifiers. This easily adaptable framework enables users to plug-in various perturbation-based XAI methods for any pre-trained time-series classification models to assess their impact on the explanation quality without having to modify the framework architecture. Additionally, we introduce Feature Importance Approximations (FIA), a new perturbation-based XAI method. These methods consist of feature insertion, deletion, and combination techniques to enhance computational efficiency and class-specific explanations in time-series classification tasks. We conduct extensive experiments in the generated synthetic dataset and various UCR Time-Series datasets to first compare the explanation performance of FIA and other existing perturbation-based XAI methods in both time-domain and time-frequency domain, and then show the superiority of our FIA in the time-frequency domain with the SpectralX framework. Finally, we conduct a user study to confirm the practicality of our FIA in SpectralX framework for class-specific time-frequency based time-series explanations. The source code is available in https://github.com/gustmd0121/Time_is_not_Enough

Read more

8/13/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Robust Explainer Recommendation for Time Series Classification

Thu Trang Nguyen, Thach Le Nguyen, Georgiana Ifrim

Time series classification is a task which deals with temporal sequences, a prevalent data type common in domains such as human activity recognition, sports analytics and general sensing. In this area, interest in explainability has been growing as explanation is key to understand the data and the model better. Recently, a great variety of techniques have been proposed and adapted for time series to provide explanation in the form of saliency maps, where the importance of each data point in the time series is quantified with a numerical value. However, the saliency maps can and often disagree, so it is unclear which one to use. This paper provides a novel framework to quantitatively evaluate and rank explanation methods for time series classification. We show how to robustly evaluate the informativeness of a given explanation method (i.e., relevance for the classification task), and how to compare explanations side-by-side. The goal is to recommend the best explainer for a given time series classification dataset. We propose AMEE, a Model-Agnostic Explanation Evaluation framework, for recommending saliency-based explanations for time series classification. In this approach, data perturbation is added to the input time series guided by each explanation. Our results show that perturbing discriminative parts of the time series leads to significant changes in classification accuracy, which can be used to evaluate each explanation. To be robust to different types of perturbations and different types of classifiers, we aggregate the accuracy loss across perturbations and classifiers. This novel approach allows us to recommend the best explainer among a set of different explainers, including random and oracle explainers. We provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis for synthetic datasets, a variety of timeseries datasets, as well as a real-world case study with known expert ground truth.

Read more

6/3/2024