Explaining word embeddings with perfect fidelity: Case study in research impact prediction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores a technique for explaining word embeddings with high fidelity.
- It presents a case study on using this technique to predict the impact of research papers.
- The key ideas are the embedding of words and documents, and how this can be used for predictive tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to [object Object] - the numerical representations of words that are used in many AI and machine learning models. These word embeddings capture the relationships between words, but can be difficult to interpret.
The researchers present a technique that can [object Object]. They use this technique in a case study to [object Object]. The key ideas are:
- Embedding of words: Representing words as numerical vectors that capture their relationships.
- Embedding of documents: Representing research papers as numerical vectors based on the words they contain.
By understanding how the word and document embeddings work, the researchers can use them to [object Object]. This could help identify important new research more efficiently.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a technique for [object Object]. This means they can fully account for how the numerical word representations are constructed.
They apply this technique in a [object Object]. Specifically, they use the word and document embeddings to [object Object].
The key steps are:
- Embedding of words: The researchers use a technique called [object Object] to find a linear transformation that maps the original word embeddings to a new set of embeddings that can be perfectly explained.
- Embedding of documents: They represent each research paper as a vector by [object Object].
- Prediction of impact: Using the document embeddings, they train a [object Object] to predict the future citation count of a paper.
The [object Object] from this case study are that the explained word embeddings enable more accurate prediction of research impact compared to using the original, opaque word embeddings.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by [object Object]. This addresses an important challenge, as word embeddings are widely used but can be difficult to interpret.
However, the [object Object] has some limitations. It only considers citation count as the measure of impact, which may not capture all aspects of a paper's influence. [object Object] could provide a more holistic assessment.
Furthermore, the [object Object] used for prediction may not capture complex, nonlinear relationships between the document embeddings and citation count. [object Object] could potentially improve the predictive performance.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel technique for [object Object]. The researchers demonstrate the utility of this approach in a case study on [object Object].
The ability to [object Object] is a significant advance, as it can help make AI and machine learning models more interpretable and trustworthy. The research impact prediction case study suggests this technique could be useful for [object Object] more efficiently.
Overall, this work demonstrates the value of [object Object] and applying them to important real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Explaining word embeddings with perfect fidelity: Case study in research impact prediction
Lucie Dvorackova, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Michal Cerny, Adriana Kubecova, Vilem Sklenak, Tomas Kliegr
Best performing approaches for scholarly document quality prediction are based on embedding models, which do not allow direct explanation of classifiers as distinct words no longer correspond to the input features for model training. Although model-agnostic explanation methods such as Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) can be applied, these produce results with questionable correspondence to the ML model. We introduce a new feature importance method, Self-model Rated Entities (SMER), for logistic regression-based classification models trained on word embeddings. We show that SMER has theoretically perfect fidelity with the explained model, as its prediction corresponds exactly to the average of predictions for individual words in the text. SMER allows us to reliably determine which words or entities positively contribute to predicting impactful articles. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation is performed through five diverse experiments conducted on 50.000 research papers from the CORD-19 corpus. Through an AOPC curve analysis, we experimentally demonstrate that SMER produces better explanations than LIME for logistic regression.
Read more9/25/2024
0
From Feature Importance to Natural Language Explanations Using LLMs with RAG
Sule Tekkesinoglu, Lars Kunze
As machine learning becomes increasingly integral to autonomous decision-making processes involving human interaction, the necessity of comprehending the model's outputs through conversational means increases. Most recently, foundation models are being explored for their potential as post hoc explainers, providing a pathway to elucidate the decision-making mechanisms of predictive models. In this work, we introduce traceable question-answering, leveraging an external knowledge repository to inform the responses of Large Language Models (LLMs) to user queries within a scene understanding task. This knowledge repository comprises contextual details regarding the model's output, containing high-level features, feature importance, and alternative probabilities. We employ subtractive counterfactual reasoning to compute feature importance, a method that entails analysing output variations resulting from decomposing semantic features. Furthermore, to maintain a seamless conversational flow, we integrate four key characteristics - social, causal, selective, and contrastive - drawn from social science research on human explanations into a single-shot prompt, guiding the response generation process. Our evaluation demonstrates that explanations generated by the LLMs encompassed these elements, indicating its potential to bridge the gap between complex model outputs and natural language expressions.
Read more7/31/2024
0
LLM-based feature generation from text for interpretable machine learning
Vojtv{e}ch Balek, Luk'av{s} S'ykora, Vil'em Sklen'ak, Tom'av{s} Kliegr
Existing text representations such as embeddings and bag-of-words are not suitable for rule learning due to their high dimensionality and absent or questionable feature-level interpretability. This article explores whether large language models (LLMs) could address this by extracting a small number of interpretable features from text. We demonstrate this process on two datasets (CORD-19 and M17+) containing several thousand scientific articles from multiple disciplines and a target being a proxy for research impact. An evaluation based on testing for the statistically significant correlation with research impact has shown that LLama 2-generated features are semantically meaningful. We consequently used these generated features in text classification to predict the binary target variable representing the citation rate for the CORD-19 dataset and the ordinal 5-class target representing an expert-awarded grade in the M17+ dataset. Machine-learning models trained on the LLM-generated features provided similar predictive performance to the state-of-the-art embedding model SciBERT for scientific text. The LLM used only 62 features compared to 768 features in SciBERT embeddings, and these features were directly interpretable, corresponding to notions such as article methodological rigor, novelty, or grammatical correctness. As the final step, we extract a small number of well-interpretable action rules. Consistently competitive results obtained with the same LLM feature set across both thematically diverse datasets show that this approach generalizes across domains.
Read more9/12/2024
0
Logistic Regression makes small LLMs strong and explainable tens-of-shot classifiers
Marcus Buckmann, Edward Hill
For simple classification tasks, we show that users can benefit from the advantages of using small, local, generative language models instead of large commercial models without a trade-off in performance or introducing extra labelling costs. These advantages, including those around privacy, availability, cost, and explainability, are important both in commercial applications and in the broader democratisation of AI. Through experiments on 17 sentence classification tasks (2-4 classes), we show that penalised logistic regression on the embeddings from a small LLM equals (and usually betters) the performance of a large LLM in the tens-of-shot regime. This requires no more labelled instances than are needed to validate the performance of the large LLM. Finally, we extract stable and sensible explanations for classification decisions.
Read more8/9/2024