Logistic Regression makes small LLMs strong and explainable tens-of-shot classifiers

Read original: arXiv:2408.03414 - Published 8/9/2024 by Marcus Buckmann, Edward Hill
Total Score

0

Logistic Regression makes small LLMs strong and explainable tens-of-shot classifiers

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Logistic regression can make small language models (LLMs) into strong and explainable "tens-of-shot" classifiers.
  • The paper demonstrates this by using logistic regression to enhance the performance and interpretability of small LLMs on text classification tasks.
  • Logistic regression provides a simple and effective way to leverage the broad language understanding of LLMs, while also making the models more transparent and explainable.

Plain English Explanation

Logistic regression is a statistical technique that can be used to enhance the capabilities of small language models. Language models are AI systems that can understand and generate human language.

In this paper, the researchers show how applying logistic regression to small language models can make them into powerful and interpretable text classifiers. Text classification is the task of assigning a category or label to a piece of text, like deciding whether an email is spam or not.

Typically, large language models perform best at these kinds of text classification tasks. But the researchers demonstrate that by using logistic regression, even small language models can achieve strong "tens-of-shot" performance - meaning they can classify texts accurately with just tens of training examples, rather than needing thousands.

Importantly, the logistic regression approach also makes these small language model classifiers more interpretable and explainable. Logistic regression provides a simple and transparent way to understand how the model is making its predictions, unlike the black box nature of many large language models.

So in summary, this research shows how a simple statistical technique like logistic regression can unlock the potential of small language models, transforming them into powerful and explainable text classifiers that rival the performance of much larger models.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a method for enhancing the performance and interpretability of small language models on text classification tasks using logistic regression.

The core idea is to use the outputs of a small pre-trained language model as features for a logistic regression classifier. Specifically, the researchers take the hidden representations produced by the language model for a given input text, and use those as the inputs to a logistic regression model that predicts the target classification label.

This approach leverages the broad language understanding captured in the pre-trained language model, while using the simple and interpretable logistic regression model to map those representations to the final classification outputs. The logistic regression model provides transparency by allowing the importance of different linguistic features to be easily interpreted.

The researchers evaluate this logistic regression approach on a range of text classification benchmarks, comparing it to both small language models used directly as classifiers, as well as larger pre-trained language models fine-tuned for the task. They find that the logistic regression approach can achieve strong "tens-of-shot" performance, meaning it can classify texts accurately with just tens of training examples, outperforming the small language models and approaching the performance of the larger fine-tuned models.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for using logistic regression to enhance small language models, demonstrating impressive classification performance and interpretability. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:

  • The experiments are limited to relatively simple text classification tasks. It would be valuable to explore how well this approach generalizes to more complex natural language processing challenges, such as question answering or multi-document summarization.

  • The interpretability benefits of logistic regression are highlighted, but the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the linguistic features that the models are leveraging to make their predictions. A deeper examination of these explainable representations could yield additional insights.

  • The experiments focus on small pre-trained language models, but it's unclear how this approach would scale to larger, more powerful language models. Further research is needed to understand the interplay between model size, logistic regression, and task performance.

  • While the tens-of-shot learning capability is impressive, the paper does not address the sample efficiency and data requirements of the logistic regression training process itself. Understanding these practical deployment considerations would be valuable.

Overall, this research offers a promising and elegant solution for boosting the capabilities of small language models. Continued work to address these potential limitations could further solidify the value of this logistic regression-based approach.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates how logistic regression can be used to transform small language models into strong and explainable text classifiers. By leveraging the language understanding of pre-trained models and the transparency of logistic regression, the researchers show how to achieve impressive "tens-of-shot" performance that rivals larger fine-tuned language models.

This work highlights the power of combining simple statistical techniques like logistic regression with the broad capabilities of language models. It suggests that interpretability and sample efficiency need not be sacrificed for raw predictive performance. As language models continue to grow in scale and capability, approaches like this could play an important role in making these powerful AI systems more accessible, understandable, and trustworthy.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Logistic Regression makes small LLMs strong and explainable tens-of-shot classifiers
Total Score

0

Logistic Regression makes small LLMs strong and explainable tens-of-shot classifiers

Marcus Buckmann, Edward Hill

For simple classification tasks, we show that users can benefit from the advantages of using small, local, generative language models instead of large commercial models without a trade-off in performance or introducing extra labelling costs. These advantages, including those around privacy, availability, cost, and explainability, are important both in commercial applications and in the broader democratisation of AI. Through experiments on 17 sentence classification tasks (2-4 classes), we show that penalised logistic regression on the embeddings from a small LLM equals (and usually betters) the performance of a large LLM in the tens-of-shot regime. This requires no more labelled instances than are needed to validate the performance of the large LLM. Finally, we extract stable and sensible explanations for classification decisions.

Read more

8/9/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Are Logistic Models Really Interpretable?

Danial Dervovic, Freddy L'ecu'e, Nicol'as Marchesotti, Daniele Magazzeni

The demand for open and trustworthy AI models points towards widespread publishing of model weights. Consumers of these model weights must be able to act accordingly with the information provided. That said, one of the simplest AI classification models, Logistic Regression (LR), has an unwieldy interpretation of its model weights, with greater difficulties when extending LR to generalised additive models. In this work, we show via a User Study that skilled participants are unable to reliably reproduce the action of small LR models given the trained parameters. As an antidote to this, we define Linearised Additive Models (LAMs), an optimal piecewise linear approximation that augments any trained additive model equipped with a sigmoid link function, requiring no retraining. We argue that LAMs are more interpretable than logistic models -- survey participants are shown to solve model reasoning tasks with LAMs much more accurately than with LR given the same information. Furthermore, we show that LAMs do not suffer from large performance penalties in terms of ROC-AUC and calibration with respect to their logistic counterparts on a broad suite of public financial modelling data.

Read more

6/21/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Model Enhanced Machine Learning Estimators for Classification

Yuhang Wu, Yingfei Wang, Chu Wang, Zeyu Zheng

Pre-trained large language models (LLM) have emerged as a powerful tool for simulating various scenarios and generating output given specific instructions and multimodal input. In this work, we analyze the specific use of LLM to enhance a classical supervised machine learning method for classification problems. We propose a few approaches to integrate LLM into a classical machine learning estimator to further enhance the prediction performance. We examine the performance of the proposed approaches through both standard supervised learning binary classification tasks, and a transfer learning task where the test data observe distribution changes compared to the training data. Numerical experiments using four publicly available datasets are conducted and suggest that using LLM to enhance classical machine learning estimators can provide significant improvement on prediction performance.

Read more

5/10/2024

From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable Regressor When Given In-Context Examples
Total Score

83

From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable Regressor When Given In-Context Examples

Robert Vacareanu, Vlad-Andrei Negru, Vasile Suciu, Mihai Surdeanu

We analyze how well pre-trained large language models (e.g., Llama2, GPT-4, Claude 3, etc) can do linear and non-linear regression when given in-context examples, without any additional training or gradient updates. Our findings reveal that several large language models (e.g., GPT-4, Claude 3) are able to perform regression tasks with a performance rivaling (or even outperforming) that of traditional supervised methods such as Random Forest, Bagging, or Gradient Boosting. For example, on the challenging Friedman #2 regression dataset, Claude 3 outperforms many supervised methods such as AdaBoost, SVM, Random Forest, KNN, or Gradient Boosting. We then investigate how well the performance of large language models scales with the number of in-context exemplars. We borrow from the notion of regret from online learning and empirically show that LLMs are capable of obtaining a sub-linear regret.

Read more

9/12/2024