Explanation as a Watermark: Towards Harmless and Multi-bit Model Ownership Verification via Watermarking Feature Attribution

Overview

• Current methods for verifying model ownership, called "backdoor-based watermarks," have significant drawbacks including introducing harmful behavior and ambiguity in ownership claims.
• This paper proposes a new approach called "Explanation as a Watermark" (EaaW) that embeds a watermark into the feature attribution explanation of a model, rather than its predictions.
• EaaW aims to address the limitations of existing watermarking methods while maintaining effectiveness and harmlessness.

Plain English Explanation

When companies or researchers create machine learning models, they often want to protect their intellectual property and ensure their models are not being used without permission. Existing watermarking methods try to achieve this by embedding a hidden "watermark" into the model that can be detected later to prove ownership.

However, the current leading watermarking approach, called "backdoor-based watermarks," has some significant problems. First, they can cause the model to make harmful or unintended mistakes on certain inputs. Second, bad actors can sometimes bypass the watermark detection by finding other inputs that the model misclassifies, making it unclear who the true owner is.

The authors of this paper realized that these limitations stem from the fact that existing watermarks rely on the model's final predictions, which are a "single bit" of information. To address this, they propose a new approach called "Explanation as a Watermark" (EaaW). Instead of embedding the watermark in the model's predictions, EaaW hides the watermark in the model's explanation of how it arrived at its predictions - the "feature attribution" that highlights which input features were most important.

By embedding the watermark in this more complex, "multi-bit" explanation information rather than just the final prediction, the authors believe they can create a more robust and harmless watermarking system. They describe the technical details of how EaaW works for different machine learning tasks like image classification and text generation, and show through experiments that it is effective at detecting ownership while avoiding the issues of previous methods.

Technical Explanation

The core idea behind the proposed "Explanation as a Watermark" (EaaW) approach is to embed a watermark into the feature attribution explanation of a model, rather than its final predictions. Feature attribution explains which input features were most important for a model's prediction.

The authors design algorithms to embed a multi-bit watermark into the feature attribution of specific "trigger" samples, without changing the original model prediction. This allows the watermark to be reliably detected later to verify model ownership, while avoiding the introduction of harmful backdoor behaviors or ambiguity in ownership claims.

Specifically, the EaaW watermarking process has two main steps:

1. Watermark Embedding: The model owner selects trigger samples and embeds a unique watermark into the feature attribution explanations for those samples, using optimization techniques inspired by XAI (explainable AI) research.

2. Watermark Extraction: When verifying ownership, the model owner extracts the watermark from the feature attribution of a suspicious model by comparing it to the original watermarked samples.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of EaaW through extensive experiments on image classification and text generation tasks. They show that the embedded watermarks are robust to potential attacks aimed at removing or overwriting them. EaaW also avoids the introduction of harmful backdoor behaviors present in previous watermarking methods.

Critical Analysis

A key strength of the EaaW approach is that it addresses the fundamental limitations of existing backdoor-based watermarking schemes. By moving the watermark from the model's final predictions to its feature attribution explanations, EaaW avoids the introduction of harmful misclassification behaviors and the ambiguity issues inherent to single-bit prediction-based watermarks.

However, the authors acknowledge that EaaW does have some practical limitations. Firstly, it requires access to the model's internal feature attribution, which may not always be available, especially for black-box commercial models. Additionally, the watermark embedding process can be computationally intensive, as it involves optimizing the feature attribution of specific trigger samples.

Another potential concern is the broader question of the reliability and security of watermarking approaches in general. As AI systems become more advanced, there may be increasingly sophisticated attacks or exploits that could compromise even the EaaW approach. The authors encourage further research into these potential vulnerabilities.

Ultimately, while EaaW represents a promising advance in model watermarking, it is likely just one step in an ongoing arms race between model creators and those seeking to misappropriate their intellectual property. Continued innovation and critical analysis of these techniques will be essential as AI systems become more ubiquitous and valuable.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new model watermarking approach called "Explanation as a Watermark" (EaaW) that embeds a multi-bit watermark into the feature attribution explanations of a model, rather than its final predictions. EaaW aims to address the key limitations of existing backdoor-based watermarking methods, namely their introduction of harmful behaviors and ambiguity in ownership claims.

Through technical details and experimental validation, the authors demonstrate that EaaW can effectively verify model ownership while avoiding the drawbacks of prior techniques. However, the approach also has practical limitations, and the broader security of AI watermarking remains an open challenge that will require ongoing research and innovation.

As AI models become increasingly valuable and ubiquitous, robust mechanisms to protect intellectual property will only grow in importance. EaaW represents a promising step forward, but the quest for reliable and secure watermarking is sure to continue.