Explanations Based on Item Response Theory (eXirt): A Model-Specific Method to Explain Tree-Ensemble Model in Trust Perspective

Read original: arXiv:2210.09933 - Published 7/4/2024 by Jos'e Ribeiro, Lucas Cardoso, Ra'issa Silva, Vitor Cirilo, N'ikolas Carneiro, Ronnie Alves
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers have been exploring different methods to explain the predictions of black box machine learning models
  • No consensus exists on the best approach, with the choice often tied to the popularity of a specific method
  • The paper introduces a new Explainable AI (XAI) method called eXirt, which is based on Item Response Theory (IRT) and targets tree-ensemble black box models using tabular data for binary classification

Plain English Explanation

Researchers have been working on ways to make it easier to understand how black box machine learning models - models that are complex and difficult to interpret - make their predictions. However, there is no agreement in the research community on the best method to use for this task. Different techniques have been proposed, such as Ciu, Dalex, Eli5, Lofo, Shap and Skater, which try to explain black box models by ranking the importance of the input features in making the model's predictions.

In this paper, the authors introduce a new Explainable AI (XAI) method called eXirt, which is based on a statistical theory called Item Response Theory (IRT). The eXirt method is designed to work with tree-ensemble black box models that use tabular data for binary classification problems. The researchers compared the feature importance rankings generated by eXirt to those from 984 rankings produced by other XAI methods, looking for similarities and differences. They also presented examples of how eXirt can provide local explanations for individual model predictions to help build trust in the model.

The key idea is that eXirt can generate global explanations of how tree-ensemble models make their predictions, as well as local explanations for specific instances, by leveraging the principles of IRT. This shows how established statistical theories can be applied to make machine learning models more interpretable and trustworthy.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the eXirt (Explainable Item Response Theory) method, which is a new Explainable AI (XAI) approach for explaining the predictions of tree-ensemble black box models using tabular data for binary classification problems. The researchers used 41 datasets, 4 tree-ensemble algorithms (Light Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting), and 6 XAI methods to compare the performance of eXirt.

In the first analysis, the authors compared the global feature relevance rankings produced by eXirt (164 rankings) to the rankings from 984 other XAI methods, such as LIME, SHAP, and TCAV, T-Explainer, and CAIML, to understand the similarities and differences between the methods.

In a second analysis, the researchers presented examples of local explanations generated by eXirt using an "Explanation-by-example" approach. These local explanations can help build trust in the model by showing how it makes predictions for specific instances.

The key insight is that the eXirt method, which is based on the principles of Item Response Theory, can provide both global and local explanations for tree-ensemble black box models. This demonstrates how established statistical frameworks can be leveraged to develop more interpretable and reliable machine learning models, as explored in this paper on unified model explanations.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the eXirt method and compares it to a wide range of existing XAI techniques. However, the authors acknowledge that the study is limited to tree-ensemble models and binary classification problems. Further research would be needed to assess the performance of eXirt on other model types and more complex prediction tasks.

Additionally, while the local explanations generated by eXirt seem promising for building trust in the model, the paper does not provide a comprehensive user study or evaluation of how effectively these explanations help end-users understand the model's decision-making process. More work may be needed to validate the practical usefulness of the eXirt approach in real-world applications.

Despite these potential limitations, the paper demonstrates a novel application of Item Response Theory to the domain of Explainable AI, which could inspire further research into bridging established statistical methods and machine learning interpretability.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new Explainable AI (XAI) method called eXirt, which leverages Item Response Theory to generate both global and local explanations for tree-ensemble black box models using tabular data for binary classification. The researchers conducted a thorough evaluation of eXirt's performance compared to existing XAI techniques, highlighting both the similarities and differences between the methods.

The key contribution of this work is the demonstration of how established statistical frameworks, such as Item Response Theory, can be applied to develop more interpretable and trustworthy machine learning models. As the demand for explainable AI systems continues to grow, approaches like eXirt that bridge the gap between machine learning and traditional statistical methods may play an increasingly important role in making complex models more accessible and usable for a wide range of applications and end-users.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Explanations Based on Item Response Theory (eXirt): A Model-Specific Method to Explain Tree-Ensemble Model in Trust Perspective

Jos'e Ribeiro, Lucas Cardoso, Ra'issa Silva, Vitor Cirilo, N'ikolas Carneiro, Ronnie Alves

In recent years, XAI researchers have been formalizing proposals and developing new methods to explain black box models, with no general consensus in the community on which method to use to explain these models, with this choice being almost directly linked to the popularity of a specific method. Methods such as Ciu, Dalex, Eli5, Lofo, Shap and Skater emerged with the proposal to explain black box models through global rankings of feature relevance, which based on different methodologies, generate global explanations that indicate how the model's inputs explain its predictions. In this context, 41 datasets, 4 tree-ensemble algorithms (Light Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting), and 6 XAI methods were used to support the launch of a new XAI method, called eXirt, based on Item Response Theory - IRT and aimed at tree-ensemble black box models that use tabular data referring to binary classification problems. In the first set of analyses, the 164 global feature relevance ranks of the eXirt were compared with 984 ranks of the other XAI methods present in the literature, seeking to highlight their similarities and differences. In a second analysis, exclusive explanations of the eXirt based on Explanation-by-example were presented that help in understanding the model trust. Thus, it was verified that eXirt is able to generate global explanations of tree-ensemble models and also local explanations of instances of models through IRT, showing how this consolidated theory can be used in machine learning in order to obtain explainable and reliable models.

Read more

7/4/2024

How Reliable and Stable are Explanations of XAI Methods?
Total Score

0

How Reliable and Stable are Explanations of XAI Methods?

Jos'e Ribeiro, Lucas Cardoso, Vitor Santos, Eduardo Carvalho, N'ikolas Carneiro, Ronnie Alves

Black box models are increasingly being used in the daily lives of human beings living in society. Along with this increase, there has been the emergence of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods aimed at generating additional explanations regarding how the model makes certain predictions. In this sense, methods such as Dalex, Eli5, eXirt, Lofo and Shap emerged as different proposals and methodologies for generating explanations of black box models in an agnostic way. Along with the emergence of these methods, questions arise such as How Reliable and Stable are XAI Methods?. With the aim of shedding light on this main question, this research creates a pipeline that performs experiments using the diabetes dataset and four different machine learning models (LGBM, MLP, DT and KNN), creating different levels of perturbations of the test data and finally generates explanations from the eXirt method regarding the confidence of the models and also feature relevances ranks from all XAI methods mentioned, in order to measure their stability in the face of perturbations. As a result, it was found that eXirt was able to identify the most reliable models among all those used. It was also found that current XAI methods are sensitive to perturbations, with the exception of one specific method.

Read more

7/4/2024

AutoIRT: Calibrating Item Response Theory Models with Automated Machine Learning
Total Score

0

AutoIRT: Calibrating Item Response Theory Models with Automated Machine Learning

James Sharpnack, Phoebe Mulcaire, Klinton Bicknell, Geoff LaFlair, Kevin Yancey

Item response theory (IRT) is a class of interpretable factor models that are widely used in computerized adaptive tests (CATs), such as language proficiency tests. Traditionally, these are fit using parametric mixed effects models on the probability of a test taker getting the correct answer to a test item (i.e., question). Neural net extensions of these models, such as BertIRT, require specialized architectures and parameter tuning. We propose a multistage fitting procedure that is compatible with out-of-the-box Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) tools. It is based on a Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) outer loop with a two stage inner loop, which trains a non-parametric AutoML grade model using item features followed by an item specific parametric model. This greatly accelerates the modeling workflow for scoring tests. We demonstrate its effectiveness by applying it to the Duolingo English Test, a high stakes, online English proficiency test. We show that the resulting model is typically more well calibrated, gets better predictive performance, and more accurate scores than existing methods (non-explanatory IRT models and explanatory IRT models like BERT-IRT). Along the way, we provide a brief survey of machine learning methods for calibration of item parameters for CATs.

Read more

9/16/2024

Extending Explainable Ensemble Trees (E2Tree) to regression contexts
Total Score

0

Extending Explainable Ensemble Trees (E2Tree) to regression contexts

Massimo Aria, Agostino Gnasso, Carmela Iorio, Marjolein Fokkema

Ensemble methods such as random forests have transformed the landscape of supervised learning, offering highly accurate prediction through the aggregation of multiple weak learners. However, despite their effectiveness, these methods often lack transparency, impeding users' comprehension of how RF models arrive at their predictions. Explainable ensemble trees (E2Tree) is a novel methodology for explaining random forests, that provides a graphical representation of the relationship between response variables and predictors. A striking characteristic of E2Tree is that it not only accounts for the effects of predictor variables on the response but also accounts for associations between the predictor variables through the computation and use of dissimilarity measures. The E2Tree methodology was initially proposed for use in classification tasks. In this paper, we extend the methodology to encompass regression contexts. To demonstrate the explanatory power of the proposed algorithm, we illustrate its use on real-world datasets.

Read more

9/11/2024