Explicit Inductive Inference using Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explicit Inductive Inference using Large Language Models
- Proposes a method to extract explicit inductive rules from large language models (LLMs)
- Aims to improve interpretability and transparency of LLM decision-making
Plain English Explanation
Explicit Inductive Inference using Large Language Models explores a way to extract clear, logical rules from large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3. LLMs can perform impressive feats of language understanding and generation, but their inner workings are often opaque. This paper suggests a process to make their decision-making more transparent by distilling the inductive biases and reasoning rules they've learned.
The key idea is to prompt the LLM to generalize from specific examples and articulate the underlying principles, rather than simply outputting text. By guiding the LLM to explicitly state its inductive rules, the researchers aim to shed light on how these powerful models arrive at their outputs. This could improve the interpretability of LLMs and build trust in their capabilities.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes a novel method called "Explicit Inductive Inference" that extracts interpretable logical rules from LLMs. The process involves presenting the LLM with a set of examples that illustrate a particular concept or pattern, then prompting it to generalize and articulate the underlying rule.
For instance, the LLM might be shown several sentences demonstrating subject-verb agreement, then asked to explicitly state the grammatical rule governing this phenomenon. By forcing the LLM to make its inductive reasoning explicit, the researchers can uncover the model's implicit knowledge and decision-making logic.
The experiments evaluate this technique on a variety of language tasks, from logical reasoning to natural language inference. The results suggest that Explicit Inductive Inference can indeed surface interpretable rules that align with human linguistic intuitions, shedding light on the inner workings of these large and complex models.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that Explicit Inductive Inference has limitations. The extracted rules may not fully capture the nuance and context-sensitivity of natural language, and the process relies on the LLM's ability to articulate its own reasoning, which may be imperfect.
Additionally, the research focuses on relatively simple linguistic phenomena; more complex reasoning and commonsense understanding remain challenging for this approach. Further work is needed to scale Explicit Inductive Inference to handle the full breadth of LLM capabilities.
Nevertheless, the authors make a compelling case that this technique can improve the transparency and accountability of LLMs, which is crucial as these models become more widely deployed. By making their decision-making processes more explicit, LLMs may earn greater trust and be more easily integrated into high-stakes applications.
Conclusion
Explicit Inductive Inference using Large Language Models presents a novel approach to extracting interpretable rules from large language models. This work represents an important step towards making these powerful AI systems more transparent and accountable. As LLMs continue to advance, techniques like this will be essential for building trust, ensuring ethical deployment, and unlocking the full potential of language-based AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Explicit Inductive Inference using Large Language Models
Tianyang Liu, Tianyi Li, Liang Cheng, Mark Steedman
Large Language Models (LLMs) are reported to hold undesirable attestation bias on inference tasks: when asked to predict if a premise P entails a hypothesis H, instead of considering H's conditional truthfulness entailed by P, LLMs tend to use the out-of-context truth label of H as a fragile proxy. In this paper, we propose a pipeline that exploits this bias to do explicit inductive inference. Our pipeline uses an LLM to transform a premise into a set of attested alternatives, and then aggregate answers of the derived new entailment inquiries to support the original inference prediction. On a directional predicate entailment benchmark, we demonstrate that by applying this simple pipeline, we can improve the overall performance of LLMs on inference and substantially alleviate the impact of their attestation bias.
Read more8/27/2024
💬
0
Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds
Victoria Basmov, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty
We evaluate LLMs' language understanding capacities on simple inference tasks that most humans find trivial. Specifically, we target (i) grammatically-specified entailments, (ii) premises with evidential adverbs of uncertainty, and (iii) monotonicity entailments. We design evaluation sets for these tasks and conduct experiments in both zero-shot and chain-of-thought setups, and with multiple prompts and LLMs. The models exhibit moderate to low performance on these evaluation sets. Subsequent experiments show that embedding the premise in syntactic constructions that should preserve the entailment relations (presupposition triggers) or change them (non-factives), further confuses the models, causing them to either under-predict or over-predict certain entailment labels regardless of the true relation, and often disregarding the nature of the embedding context. Overall these results suggest that, despite LLMs' celebrated language understanding capacity, even the strongest models have blindspots with respect to certain types of entailments, and certain information-packaging structures act as ``blinds'' overshadowing the semantics of the embedded premise.
Read more4/12/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models are Effective Priors for Causal Graph Discovery
Victor-Alexandru Darvariu, Stephen Hailes, Mirco Musolesi
Causal structure discovery from observations can be improved by integrating background knowledge provided by an expert to reduce the hypothesis space. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have begun to be considered as sources of prior information given the low cost of querying them relative to a human expert. In this work, firstly, we propose a set of metrics for assessing LLM judgments for causal graph discovery independently of the downstream algorithm. Secondly, we systematically study a set of prompting designs that allows the model to specify priors about the structure of the causal graph. Finally, we present a general methodology for the integration of LLM priors in graph discovery algorithms, finding that they help improve performance on common-sense benchmarks and especially when used for assessing edge directionality. Our work highlights the potential as well as the shortcomings of the use of LLMs in this problem space.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners
Linyi Yang, Shuibai Zhang, Zhuohao Yu, Guangsheng Bao, Yidong Wang, Jindong Wang, Ruochen Xu, Wei Ye, Xing Xie, Weizhu Chen, Yue Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The recent progress in large-scale generative models has further expanded their use in real-world language applications. However, the critical challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. While previous in-context learning research has focused on enhancing models to adhere to users' specific instructions and quality expectations, and to avoid undesired outputs, little to no work has explored the use of task-Specific fine-tuned Language Models (SLMs) to improve LLMs' in-context learning during the inference stage. Our primary contribution is the establishment of a simple yet effective framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks. Using our proposed plug-in method, enhanced versions of Llama 2 and ChatGPT surpass their original versions regarding generalizability and factuality. We offer a comprehensive suite of resources, including 16 curated datasets, prompts, model checkpoints, and LLM outputs across 9 distinct tasks. The code and data are released at: https://github.com/YangLinyi/Supervised-Knowledge-Makes-Large-Language-Models-Better-In-context-Learners. Our empirical analysis sheds light on the advantages of incorporating discriminative models into LLMs and highlights the potential of our methodology in fostering more reliable LLMs.
Read more4/12/2024