Exploring a Cognitive Architecture for Learning Arithmetic Equations

Read original: arXiv:2405.04550 - Published 5/9/2024 by Cole Gawin
Total Score

0

Exploring a Cognitive Architecture for Learning Arithmetic Equations

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a cognitive architecture for learning arithmetic equations.
  • The researchers investigate a model that can learn to solve arithmetic equations through interaction with examples.
  • The model is inspired by how humans learn mathematical concepts and aims to provide insights into the cognitive processes involved.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a computational model that is designed to learn how to solve arithmetic equations, similar to how humans learn these skills. The model interacts with examples of arithmetic problems and equations, and over time, it develops an understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts and patterns.

The model is based on the idea that humans acquire mathematical knowledge through a combination of symbolic reasoning and statistical learning. The researchers have created a modular, hierarchical architecture that aims to capture these cognitive processes, allowing the model to learn arithmetic equations in a more human-like way.

By studying how this model learns and solves arithmetic problems, the researchers hope to gain insights into the cognitive mechanisms involved in human mathematical reasoning and understanding.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a cognitive architecture for learning arithmetic equations, which consists of several interconnected components. The model includes a working memory system, a long-term memory system, and a problem-solving module.

The working memory system is responsible for temporarily storing and manipulating the elements of the arithmetic equations, such as numbers and operators. The long-term memory system learns and stores representations of common arithmetic patterns and concepts over time, allowing the model to recognize and apply these patterns when solving new problems.

The problem-solving module uses a combination of symbolic reasoning and statistical learning to interpret the equations and generate solutions. This module interacts with the working and long-term memory systems to draw upon relevant knowledge and apply appropriate strategies for solving the equations.

The model is trained on a dataset of arithmetic equations, and its performance is evaluated on both seen and unseen examples. The results suggest that the cognitive architecture is able to learn and generalize the underlying mathematical principles, demonstrating the potential of this approach for modeling human-like mathematical reasoning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to modeling how humans learn and solve arithmetic equations, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One potential limitation is the scope of the model, which currently focuses on a relatively narrow domain of arithmetic equations. It will be important for future work to explore the scalability of the architecture to more complex mathematical domains, such as algebra or calculus.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed comparison of the model's performance to human benchmarks or other computational approaches. Further empirical studies would be needed to fully assess the model's ability to capture the nuances of human mathematical cognition.

The researchers also note that the current architecture does not account for some aspects of human learning, such as the role of external tools, social interaction, or metacognitive strategies. Incorporating these elements could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of mathematical problem-solving.

Despite these limitations, the paper presents a thought-provoking approach to modeling mathematical cognition and highlights the potential of integrating symbolic reasoning and statistical learning in cognitive architectures. Further development and evaluation of this model could yield valuable insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying human mathematical understanding.

Conclusion

The paper explores a cognitive architecture for learning arithmetic equations, which aims to capture the symbolic and statistical processes involved in human mathematical reasoning. By designing a model that can learn to solve arithmetic problems in a more human-like way, the researchers hope to gain insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying mathematical cognition.

While the current model has some limitations, the overall approach represents an important step towards understanding and modeling the complex cognitive processes involved in mathematical learning and problem-solving. Further development and evaluation of this architecture could have significant implications for the fields of computational cognition and educational technology.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring a Cognitive Architecture for Learning Arithmetic Equations
Total Score

0

Exploring a Cognitive Architecture for Learning Arithmetic Equations

Cole Gawin

The acquisition and performance of arithmetic skills and basic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are essential for daily functioning, and reflect complex cognitive processes. This paper explores the cognitive mechanisms powering arithmetic learning, presenting a neurobiologically plausible cognitive architecture that simulates the acquisition of these skills. I implement a number vectorization embedding network and an associative memory model to investigate how an intelligent system can learn and recall arithmetic equations in a manner analogous to the human brain. I perform experiments that provide insights into the generalization capabilities of connectionist models, neurological causes of dyscalculia, and the influence of network architecture on cognitive performance. Through this interdisciplinary investigation, I aim to contribute to ongoing research into the neural correlates of mathematical cognition in intelligent systems.

Read more

5/9/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Arithmetic with Language Models: from Memorization to Computation

Davide Maltoni, Matteo Ferrara

A better understanding of the emergent computation and problem-solving capabilities of recent large language models is of paramount importance to further improve them and broaden their applicability. This work investigates how a language model, trained to predict the next token, can perform arithmetic computations generalizing beyond training data. Binary addition and multiplication constitute a good testbed for this purpose, since they require a very small vocabulary and exhibit relevant input/output discontinuities making smooth input interpolation ineffective for novel data. We successfully trained a light language model to learn these tasks and ran a number of experiments to investigate the extrapolation capabilities and internal information processing. Our findings support the hypothesis that the language model works as an Encoding-Regression-Decoding machine where the computation takes place in the value space once the input token representation is mapped to an appropriate internal representation.

Read more

8/6/2024

Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculation
Total Score

0

Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculation

Wei Zhang, Chaoqun Wan, Yonggang Zhang, Yiu-ming Cheung, Xinmei Tian, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across numerous applications and have shown an emergent ability to tackle complex reasoning tasks, such as mathematical computations. However, even for the simplest arithmetic calculations, the intrinsic mechanisms behind LLMs remain mysterious, making it challenging to ensure reliability. In this work, we delve into uncovering a specific mechanism by which LLMs execute calculations. Through comprehensive experiments, we find that LLMs frequently involve a small fraction (< 5%) of attention heads, which play a pivotal role in focusing on operands and operators during calculation processes. Subsequently, the information from these operands is processed through multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), progressively leading to the final solution. These pivotal heads/MLPs, though identified on a specific dataset, exhibit transferability across different datasets and even distinct tasks. This insight prompted us to investigate the potential benefits of selectively fine-tuning these essential heads/MLPs to boost the LLMs' computational performance. We empirically find that such precise tuning can yield notable enhancements on mathematical prowess, without compromising the performance on non-mathematical tasks. Our work serves as a preliminary exploration into the arithmetic calculation abilities inherent in LLMs, laying a solid foundation to reveal more intricate mathematical tasks.

Read more

9/4/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble that of spatial cognition more than natural language processing

Yuannan Li, Shan Xu, Jia Liu

The ability to manipulate logical-mathematical symbols (LMS), encompassing tasks such as calculation, reasoning, and programming, is a cognitive skill arguably unique to humans. Considering the relatively recent emergence of this ability in human evolutionary history, it has been suggested that LMS processing may build upon more fundamental cognitive systems, possibly through neuronal recycling. Previous studies have pinpointed two primary candidates, natural language processing and spatial cognition. Existing comparisons between these domains largely relied on task-level comparison, which may be confounded by task idiosyncrasy. The present study instead compared the neural correlates at the domain level with both automated meta-analysis and synthesized maps based on three representative LMS tasks, reasoning, calculation, and mental programming. Our results revealed a more substantial cortical overlap between LMS processing and spatial cognition, in contrast to language processing. Furthermore, in regions activated by both spatial and language processing, the multivariate activation pattern for LMS processing exhibited greater multivariate similarity to spatial cognition than to language processing. A hierarchical clustering analysis further indicated that typical LMS tasks were indistinguishable from spatial cognition tasks at the neural level, suggesting an inherent connection between these two cognitive processes. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that spatial cognition is likely the basis of LMS processing, which may shed light on the limitations of large language models in logical reasoning, particularly those trained exclusively on textual data without explicit emphasis on spatial content.

Read more

6/21/2024