Exploring Factual Entailment with NLI: A News Media Study

Read original: arXiv:2406.16842 - Published 6/26/2024 by Guy Mor-Lan, Effi Levi
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the concept of "factual entailment" using natural language inference (NLI) techniques in the context of news media articles.
  • The researchers aim to investigate how well NLI models can identify factual claims and their relationships within news texts.
  • The study analyzes a novel dataset of news article pairs and evaluates the performance of different NLI models on this task.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how well AI language models can identify and understand the factual claims made in news articles. They used a technique called "natural language inference" (NLI), which allows models to analyze the logical relationships between different statements.

The researchers created a dataset of news article pairs and asked the NLI models to determine if one article's claims were "entailed" (or logically implied) by the other article. This helped them evaluate how well the models could detect factual claims and how they relate to each other in news texts.

The key idea is that by using NLI, we can better understand the factual content of news articles and how different pieces of information are connected. This could be useful for tasks like fact-checking, summarization, or even detecting misinformation in the media. The researchers explored the capabilities and limitations of current NLI models in this specific news domain.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the task of "factual entailment" - determining whether one factual claim logically follows from another claim within news articles. The researchers created a dataset of news article pairs and annotated them for factual entailment relationships.

They then evaluated the performance of several state-of-the-art NLI models on this task, including BERT, RoBERTa, and MNLI. The models were trained on the SNLI and MNLI datasets before being tested on the news article dataset.

The results showed that the NLI models were able to identify factual entailment relationships with reasonable accuracy, but also highlighted some limitations. The models struggled more with articles containing complex reasoning, subtlety, or reliance on world knowledge. The researchers suggest that further advancements in factual reasoning and commonsense understanding are needed to fully capture the nuances of factual claims in news media.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable exploration of the application of NLI techniques to the domain of news media. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of current NLI models in handling the complexities of real-world news texts, which often require deeper reasoning and world knowledge.

One potential concern is the reliance on manual annotations for the news article dataset. The annotation process could introduce human biases or inconsistencies, which could impact the reliability of the evaluation. The researchers could have explored ways to validate the dataset or incorporate automated fact-checking approaches to further strengthen their analysis.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential societal implications or ethical considerations around the use of NLI for news analysis. As these techniques become more advanced, it will be important to consider how they could be used to detect or even generate misinformation, and to develop safeguards to ensure responsible and transparent application.

Conclusion

This paper presents an insightful exploration of using natural language inference (NLI) techniques to analyze the factual content of news articles. The researchers have created a valuable dataset and demonstrated the capabilities and limitations of current NLI models in this domain.

The findings highlight the need for continued advancements in factual reasoning and commonsense understanding to fully capture the nuances of news media. As these technologies evolve, it will be crucial to consider the societal implications and develop robust mechanisms to ensure their responsible and ethical use.

Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of how AI can be leveraged to enhance the analysis and comprehension of news content, with potential applications in areas like fact-checking, information verification, and media literacy.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

Exploring Factual Entailment with NLI: A News Media Study

Guy Mor-Lan, Effi Levi

We explore the relationship between factuality and Natural Language Inference (NLI) by introducing FactRel -- a novel annotation scheme that models textit{factual} rather than textit{textual} entailment, and use it to annotate a dataset of naturally occurring sentences from news articles. Our analysis shows that 84% of factually supporting pairs and 63% of factually undermining pairs do not amount to NLI entailment or contradiction, respectively, suggesting that factual relationships are more apt for analyzing media discourse. We experiment with models for pairwise classification on the new dataset, and find that in some cases, generating synthetic data with GPT-4 on the basis of the annotated dataset can improve performance. Surprisingly, few-shot learning with GPT-4 yields strong results on par with medium LMs (DeBERTa) trained on the labelled dataset. We hypothesize that these results indicate the fundamental dependence of this task on both world knowledge and advanced reasoning abilities.

Read more

6/26/2024

Measuring text summarization factuality using atomic facts entailment metrics in the context of retrieval augmented generation
Total Score

0

Measuring text summarization factuality using atomic facts entailment metrics in the context of retrieval augmented generation

N. E. Kriman

The use of large language models (LLMs) has significantly increased since the introduction of ChatGPT in 2022, demonstrating their value across various applications. However, a major challenge for enterprise and commercial adoption of LLMs is their tendency to generate inaccurate information, a phenomenon known as hallucination. This project proposes a method for estimating the factuality of a summary generated by LLMs when compared to a source text. Our approach utilizes Naive Bayes classification to assess the accuracy of the content produced.

Read more

8/28/2024

⚙️

Total Score

0

New!Predicting Sentence-Level Factuality of News and Bias of Media Outlets

Francielle Vargas, Kokil Jaidka, Thiago A. S. Pardo, Fabr'icio Benevenuto

Automated news credibility and fact-checking at scale require accurately predicting news factuality and media bias. This paper introduces a large sentence-level dataset, titled FactNews, composed of 6,191 sentences expertly annotated according to factuality and media bias definitions proposed by AllSides. We use FactNews to assess the overall reliability of news sources, by formulating two text classification problems for predicting sentence-level factuality of news reporting and bias of media outlets. Our experiments demonstrate that biased sentences present a higher number of words compared to factual sentences, besides having a predominance of emotions. Hence, the fine-grained analysis of subjectivity and impartiality of news articles provided promising results for predicting the reliability of media outlets. Finally, due to the severity of fake news and political polarization in Brazil, and the lack of research for Portuguese, both dataset and baseline were proposed for Brazilian Portuguese.

Read more

9/16/2024

Identification of Entailment and Contradiction Relations between Natural Language Sentences: A Neurosymbolic Approach
Total Score

0

Identification of Entailment and Contradiction Relations between Natural Language Sentences: A Neurosymbolic Approach

Xuyao Feng, Anthony Hunter

Natural language inference (NLI), also known as Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE), is an important aspect of natural language understanding. Most research now uses machine learning and deep learning to perform this task on specific datasets, meaning their solution is not explainable nor explicit. To address the need for an explainable approach to RTE, we propose a novel pipeline that is based on translating text into an Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) graph. For this we use a pre-trained AMR parser. We then translate the AMR graph into propositional logic and use a SAT solver for automated reasoning. In text, often commonsense suggests that an entailment (or contradiction) relationship holds between a premise and a claim, but because different wordings are used, this is not identified from their logical representations. To address this, we introduce relaxation methods to allow replacement or forgetting of some propositions. Our experimental results show this pipeline performs well on four RTE datasets.

Read more

5/3/2024