Exploring the Robustness of Decision-Level Through Adversarial Attacks on LLM-Based Embodied Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.19802 - Published 7/17/2024 by Shuyuan Liu, Jiawei Chen, Shouwei Ruan, Hang Su, Zhaoxia Yin
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper introduces a new template for academic papers called "The Name of the Title is Hope".
  • The template aims to improve the structure and readability of research papers, making them more accessible to a general audience.
  • Key features of the template include a clear and engaging title, a concise introduction, and well-organized sections that guide the reader through the paper's content.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new template for writing academic papers that is designed to be more user-friendly and accessible. Rather than using a traditional, dry format, the "The Name of the Title is Hope" template encourages researchers to craft a clear, compelling title that captures the essence of their work. The introduction is kept brief and focused, helping readers quickly understand the paper's key objectives and insights.

The body of the paper is then organized into well-structured sections, each with a descriptive heading that previews the content. This makes it easier for readers to navigate the material and identify the most relevant information. Overall, the template aims to present complex research in a way that is engaging and easy to understand for a general audience, without sacrificing the technical depth required for academic publication.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines the key components of the "The Name of the Title is Hope" template, which include:

  1. Title: The title should be concise, informative, and crafted to pique the reader's interest. It should capture the essence of the research in an accessible way.

  2. Introduction: The introduction should provide a brief, high-level overview of the paper's objectives, main findings, and potential implications. It should be no more than a few paragraphs long.

  3. Sections: The body of the paper should be divided into well-organized sections, each with a descriptive heading that previews the content. These sections should guide the reader through the research in a logical, easy-to-follow manner.

  4. Writing Style: The language used throughout the paper should be clear, concise, and accessible to a general audience. Technical jargon should be used sparingly and explained when necessary.

  5. Formatting: The paper should be formatted using standard academic conventions, such as consistent headings, in-text citations, and a reference list.

The authors suggest that this template can help researchers communicate their work more effectively, leading to greater engagement and understanding from a wider audience.

Critical Analysis

The "The Name of the Title is Hope" template proposed in this paper is a promising approach to improving the readability and accessibility of academic research. By focusing on clear, engaging communication, the template aligns with the growing movement towards making scientific knowledge more accessible to the general public.

However, the paper does not address potential challenges or limitations of this approach. For example, there may be concerns that oversimplifying complex research could lead to a loss of nuance or technical detail. Additionally, the authors do not discuss how this template might be received or adopted by the academic community, which can be resistant to significant changes in publication norms.

Further research and feedback from the broader academic community would be helpful to assess the long-term viability and impact of this template. Nonetheless, the core principles of the "The Name of the Title is Hope" approach, such as emphasizing clarity, organization, and accessibility, are valuable considerations for all researchers seeking to communicate their work effectively.

Conclusion

The "The Name of the Title is Hope" template proposed in this paper offers a promising way to improve the structure and readability of academic research papers. By focusing on a clear, engaging title, a concise introduction, and well-organized sections, the template aims to make complex research more accessible to a general audience without compromising technical depth.

While the paper does not address all the potential challenges and limitations of this approach, the core principles of the template, such as emphasizing clarity and accessibility, are valuable considerations for researchers seeking to communicate their work more effectively. As the academic community continues to grapple with the need for more accessible and impactful research, templates like "The Name of the Title is Hope" may play an important role in shaping the future of scientific communication.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Exploring the Robustness of Decision-Level Through Adversarial Attacks on LLM-Based Embodied Models

Shuyuan Liu, Jiawei Chen, Shouwei Ruan, Hang Su, Zhaoxia Yin

Embodied intelligence empowers agents with a profound sense of perception, enabling them to respond in a manner closely aligned with real-world situations. Large Language Models (LLMs) delve into language instructions with depth, serving a crucial role in generating plans for intricate tasks. Thus, LLM-based embodied models further enhance the agent's capacity to comprehend and process information. However, this amalgamation also ushers in new challenges in the pursuit of heightened intelligence. Specifically, attackers can manipulate LLMs to produce irrelevant or even malicious outputs by altering their prompts. Confronted with this challenge, we observe a notable absence of multi-modal datasets essential for comprehensively evaluating the robustness of LLM-based embodied models. Consequently, we construct the Embodied Intelligent Robot Attack Dataset (EIRAD), tailored specifically for robustness evaluation. Additionally, two attack strategies are devised, including untargeted attacks and targeted attacks, to effectively simulate a range of diverse attack scenarios. At the same time, during the attack process, to more accurately ascertain whether our method is successful in attacking the LLM-based embodied model, we devise a new attack success evaluation method utilizing the BLIP2 model. Recognizing the time and cost-intensive nature of the GCG algorithm in attacks, we devise a scheme for prompt suffix initialization based on various target tasks, thus expediting the convergence process. Experimental results demonstrate that our method exhibits a superior attack success rate when targeting LLM-based embodied models, indicating a lower level of decision-level robustness in these models.

Read more

7/17/2024

Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study
Total Score

0

Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study

Zeyu Yang, Zhao Meng, Xiaochen Zheng, Roger Wattenhofer

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, but their robustness against adversarial attacks remains a critical concern. We presents a novel white-box style attack approach that exposes vulnerabilities in leading open-source LLMs, including Llama, OPT, and T5. We assess the impact of model size, structure, and fine-tuning strategies on their resistance to adversarial perturbations. Our comprehensive evaluation across five diverse text classification tasks establishes a new benchmark for LLM robustness. The findings of this study have far-reaching implications for the reliable deployment of LLMs in real-world applications and contribute to the advancement of trustworthy AI systems.

Read more

9/16/2024

Compromising Embodied Agents with Contextual Backdoor Attacks
Total Score

0

Compromising Embodied Agents with Contextual Backdoor Attacks

Aishan Liu, Yuguang Zhou, Xianglong Liu, Tianyuan Zhang, Siyuan Liang, Jiakai Wang, Yanjun Pu, Tianlin Li, Junqi Zhang, Wenbo Zhou, Qing Guo, Dacheng Tao

Large language models (LLMs) have transformed the development of embodied intelligence. By providing a few contextual demonstrations, developers can utilize the extensive internal knowledge of LLMs to effortlessly translate complex tasks described in abstract language into sequences of code snippets, which will serve as the execution logic for embodied agents. However, this paper uncovers a significant backdoor security threat within this process and introduces a novel method called method{}. By poisoning just a few contextual demonstrations, attackers can covertly compromise the contextual environment of a black-box LLM, prompting it to generate programs with context-dependent defects. These programs appear logically sound but contain defects that can activate and induce unintended behaviors when the operational agent encounters specific triggers in its interactive environment. To compromise the LLM's contextual environment, we employ adversarial in-context generation to optimize poisoned demonstrations, where an LLM judge evaluates these poisoned prompts, reporting to an additional LLM that iteratively optimizes the demonstration in a two-player adversarial game using chain-of-thought reasoning. To enable context-dependent behaviors in downstream agents, we implement a dual-modality activation strategy that controls both the generation and execution of program defects through textual and visual triggers. We expand the scope of our attack by developing five program defect modes that compromise key aspects of confidentiality, integrity, and availability in embodied agents. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted extensive experiments across various tasks, including robot planning, robot manipulation, and compositional visual reasoning. Additionally, we demonstrate the potential impact of our approach by successfully attacking real-world autonomous driving systems.

Read more

8/7/2024

Large Language Model Sentinel: Advancing Adversarial Robustness by LLM Agent
Total Score

0

Large Language Model Sentinel: Advancing Adversarial Robustness by LLM Agent

Guang Lin, Qibin Zhao

Over the past two years, the use of large language models (LLMs) has advanced rapidly. While these LLMs offer considerable convenience, they also raise security concerns, as LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks by some well-designed textual perturbations. In this paper, we introduce a novel defense technique named Large LAnguage MOdel Sentinel (LLAMOS), which is designed to enhance the adversarial robustness of LLMs by purifying the adversarial textual examples before feeding them into the target LLM. Our method comprises two main components: a) Agent instruction, which can simulate a new agent for adversarial defense, altering minimal characters to maintain the original meaning of the sentence while defending against attacks; b) Defense guidance, which provides strategies for modifying clean or adversarial examples to ensure effective defense and accurate outputs from the target LLMs. Remarkably, the defense agent demonstrates robust defensive capabilities even without learning from adversarial examples. Additionally, we conduct an intriguing adversarial experiment where we develop two agents, one for defense and one for attack, and engage them in mutual confrontation. During the adversarial interactions, neither agent completely beat the other. Extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source LLMs demonstrate that our method effectively defends against adversarial attacks, thereby enhancing adversarial robustness.

Read more

8/29/2024