Exploring the Use of Abusive Generative AI Models on Civitai
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper explores the Civitai ecosystem, an open-source platform for sharing and discovering AI-generated images. • The researchers analyze the content, usage patterns, and community dynamics within Civitai to understand the characteristics of this emerging ecosystem. • Key findings include insights into the types of AI models used, the popularity of different content categories, and the interactions between creators and users.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines Civitai, an online platform where people can share and find AI-generated images. The researchers study the content, how people use the platform, and the community interactions to better understand this new ecosystem.
Some of the main findings include:
- The different AI models that are used to create the images on Civitai
- The most popular types of content on the platform
- How creators and users engage with each other on Civitai
The researchers provide a detailed look at this emerging space where AI-generated art and images are being shared and discovered by a growing community.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the Civitai ecosystem, an open-source platform for sharing and discovering AI-generated images. The researchers collected data from Civitai, including information about the posted content, user interactions, and community dynamics.
Key elements of the analysis include:
- Characterizing the types of AI models used to generate the images on Civitai, such as Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, and Midjourney
- Examining the popularity and distribution of different content categories, including portraits, landscapes, and fantasy/sci-fi scenes
- Exploring the interactions between creators who upload content and users who engage with it through comments, downloads, and other actions
The insights from this research provide a deeper understanding of how this emerging AI-generated content ecosystem is evolving and the factors that shape its development.
Critical Analysis
The paper offers a thorough examination of the Civitai platform, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The data collection was limited to a specific time period, so the analysis may not fully capture the dynamic and rapidly changing nature of the Civitai ecosystem. Longitudinal studies could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how the platform and its usage evolve over time.
-
The analysis focuses on broad trends and patterns, but does not delve deeply into the individual motivations, experiences, and perspectives of Civitai users and creators. Qualitative research could complement the quantitative approach to offer richer insights into the human aspects of this ecosystem.
-
The study does not explore the potential societal implications or ethical concerns associated with the widespread creation and distribution of AI-generated images, which could be an important area for future research.
Overall, this paper provides a valuable foundation for understanding the Civitai ecosystem, but continued exploration and a more holistic examination of the broader implications would be beneficial.
Conclusion
The researchers have presented a comprehensive analysis of the Civitai ecosystem, an open-source platform for sharing and discovering AI-generated images. Their findings offer insights into the types of AI models used, the popularity of different content categories, and the interactions between creators and users within this emerging space.
While the study provides a solid foundation for understanding Civitai, there are opportunities for further research to explore the dynamic evolution of the platform, the human experiences and perspectives of its users, and the broader societal implications of AI-generated content. As the use of generative AI technologies continues to grow, studies like this will be essential for staying vigilant and understanding the complex landscape of AI-generated content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Exploring the Use of Abusive Generative AI Models on Civitai
Yiluo Wei, Yiming Zhu, Pan Hui, Gareth Tyson
The rise of generative AI is transforming the landscape of digital imagery, and exerting a significant influence on online creative communities. This has led to the emergence of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) social platforms, such as Civitai. These distinctive social platforms allow users to build and share their own generative AI models, thereby enhancing the potential for more diverse artistic expression. Designed in the vein of social networks, they also provide artists with the means to showcase their creations (generated from the models), engage in discussions, and obtain feedback, thus nurturing a sense of community. Yet, this openness also raises concerns about the abuse of such platforms, e.g., using models to disseminate deceptive deepfakes or infringe upon copyrights. To explore this, we conduct the first comprehensive empirical study of an AIGC social platform, focusing on its use for generating abusive content. As an exemplar, we construct a comprehensive dataset covering Civitai, the largest available AIGC social platform. Based on this dataset of 87K models and 2M images, we explore the characteristics of content and discuss strategies for moderation to better govern these platforms.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC): A Survey of Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities
Xiaomin Yu, Yezhaohui Wang, Yanfang Chen, Zhen Tao, Dinghao Xi, Shichao Song, Simin Niu, Zhiyu Li
In recent years, generative artificial intelligence models, represented by Large Language Models (LLMs) and Diffusion Models (DMs), have revolutionized content production methods. These artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) have become deeply embedded in various aspects of daily life and work. However, these technologies have also led to the emergence of Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (FAIGC), posing new challenges in distinguishing genuine information. It is crucial to recognize that AIGC technology is akin to a double-edged sword; its potent generative capabilities, while beneficial, also pose risks for the creation and dissemination of FAIGC. In this survey, We propose a new taxonomy that provides a more comprehensive breakdown of the space of FAIGC methods today. Next, we explore the modalities and generative technologies of FAIGC. We introduce FAIGC detection methods and summarize the related benchmark from various perspectives. Finally, we discuss outstanding challenges and promising areas for future research.
Read more5/6/2024
🔗
1
There Has To Be a Lot That We're Missing: Moderating AI-Generated Content on Reddit
Travis Lloyd, Joseph Reagle, Mor Naaman
Generative AI has begun to alter how we work, learn, communicate, and participate in online communities. How might our online communities be changed by generative AI? To start addressing this question, we focused on online community moderators' experiences with AI-generated content (AIGC). We performed fifteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews with community moderators on the social sharing site Reddit to understand their attitudes towards AIGC and how their communities are responding. Our study finds communities are choosing to enact rules restricting use of AIGC for both ideological and practical reasons. We find that, despite the absence of foolproof tools for detecting AIGC, moderators were able to somewhat limit the disruption caused by this new phenomenon by working with their communities to clarify norms about AIGC use. However, moderators found enforcing AIGC restrictions challenging, and had to rely on time-intensive and inaccurate detection heuristics in their efforts. Our results highlight the importance of supporting community autonomy and self-determination in the face of this sudden technological change, and suggest potential design solutions that may help.
Read more7/4/2024
🛸
0
Staying vigilant in the Age of AI: From content generation to content authentication
Yufan Li, Zhan Wang, Theo Papatheodorou
This paper presents the Yangtze Sea project, an initiative in the battle against Generative AI (GAI)-generated fake con-tent. Addressing a pressing issue in the digital age, we investigate public reactions to AI-created fabrications through a structured experiment on a simulated academic conference platform. Our findings indicate a profound public challenge in discerning such content, highlighted by GAI's capacity for realistic fabrications. To counter this, we introduce an innovative approach employing large language models like ChatGPT for truthfulness assess-ment. We detail a specific workflow for scrutinizing the authenticity of everyday digital content, aimed at boosting public awareness and capability in identifying fake mate-rials. We apply this workflow to an agent bot on Telegram to help users identify the authenticity of text content through conversations. Our project encapsulates a two-pronged strategy: generating fake content to understand its dynamics and developing assessment techniques to mitigate its impact. As part of that effort we propose the creation of speculative fact-checking wearables in the shape of reading glasses and a clip-on. As a computational media art initiative, this project under-scores the delicate interplay between technological progress, ethical consid-erations, and societal consciousness.
Read more7/2/2024