Generative AI Misuse: A Taxonomy of Tactics and Insights from Real-World Data
2406.13843
3
0
Abstract
Generative, multimodal artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers transformative potential across industries, but its misuse poses significant risks. Prior research has shed light on the potential of advanced AI systems to be exploited for malicious purposes. However, we still lack a concrete understanding of how GenAI models are specifically exploited or abused in practice, including the tactics employed to inflict harm. In this paper, we present a taxonomy of GenAI misuse tactics, informed by existing academic literature and a qualitative analysis of approximately 200 observed incidents of misuse reported between January 2023 and March 2024. Through this analysis, we illuminate key and novel patterns in misuse during this time period, including potential motivations, strategies, and how attackers leverage and abuse system capabilities across modalities (e.g. image, text, audio, video) in the wild.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a taxonomy of tactics for the misuse of generative AI systems, and provides insights from real-world data.
- The researchers studied examples of AI misuse to identify common tactics and understand the motivations and impacts.
- The findings offer important lessons for developing safer and more responsible AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how people are misusing powerful AI tools, like chatbots and content generators, to cause harm. The researchers looked at real-world examples to identify common tactics employed by bad actors. This includes using AI to create misinformation, impersonate others, or generate abusive content.
The analysis reveals some concerning trends. For instance, AI misuse tactics can enable the "influencer next door" to easily spread disinformation. Additionally, data pollution issues with AI systems can amplify the harms. The findings highlight the need for more robust safety and ethical frameworks to prevent generative AI from being misused.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a comprehensive review of real-world incidents involving the misuse of generative AI systems. They compiled a taxonomy of common tactics, including:
- Identity Impersonation: Using AI to mimic someone's voice, image or writing style to deceive
- Misinformation Generation: Automating the production of false or misleading content
- Abusive Content Creation: Generating harassing, hateful or otherwise harmful text, images or media
The paper analyzes the motivations behind these tactics, such as financial gain, political influence, and personal grudges. It also examines the scale, reach and impact of these misuse cases, which can be difficult to detect and combat.
The insights from this research can inform the development of more robust legal and technical safeguards to mitigate the risks of generative AI systems. This includes better authentication, content moderation, and transparency measures.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable taxonomy and real-world examples to better understand the emerging threat of generative AI misuse. However, it acknowledges that the dataset is limited and may not fully capture the scale and diversity of these tactics in practice.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical details of how these misuse cases were detected and analyzed. More information on the methodologies used could strengthen the credibility of the findings.
While the paper offers high-level recommendations, it lacks specific guidance on how to effectively implement safeguards and counter-measures. Further research is needed to translate these insights into actionable solutions.
Conclusion
This study sheds important light on the troubling ways that generative AI systems are being exploited for nefarious purposes. The taxonomy of misuse tactics and real-world case studies provide a crucial foundation for developing more robust safety and security measures.
Ultimately, the findings underscore the critical importance of proactively addressing the risks of generative AI, rather than waiting for these technologies to cause widespread harm. Ongoing research and collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers will be essential to ensure the responsible development and deployment of these powerful tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interference
Emilio Ferrara
0
0
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) pose significant risks, particularly in the realm of online election interference. This paper explores the nefarious applications of GenAI, highlighting their potential to disrupt democratic processes through deepfakes, botnets, targeted misinformation campaigns, and synthetic identities.
6/5/2024
⚙️
A Legal Risk Taxonomy for Generative Artificial Intelligence
David Atkinson, Jacob Morrison
0
0
For the first time, this paper presents a taxonomy of legal risks associated with generative AI (GenAI) by breaking down complex legal concepts to provide a common understanding of potential legal challenges for developing and deploying GenAI models. The methodology is based on (1) examining the legal claims that have been filed in existing lawsuits and (2) evaluating the reasonably foreseeable legal claims that may be filed in future lawsuits. First, we identified 29 lawsuits against prominent GenAI entities and tallied the claims of each lawsuit. From there, we identified seven claims that are cited at least four times across these lawsuits as the most likely claims for future GenAI lawsuits. For each of these seven claims, we describe the elements of the claim (what the plaintiff must prove to prevail) and provide an example of how it may apply to GenAI. Next, we identified 30 other potential claims that we consider to be more speculative, because they have been included in fewer than four lawsuits or have yet to be filed. We further separated those 30 claims into 19 that are most likely to be made in relation to pre-deployment of GenAI models and 11 that are more likely to be made in connection with post-deployment of GenAI models since the legal risks will vary between entities that create versus deploy them. For each of these claims, we describe the elements of the claim and the potential remedies that plaintiffs may seek to help entities determine their legal risks in developing or deploying GenAI. Lastly, we close the paper by noting the novelty of GenAI technology and propose some applications for the paper's taxonomy in driving further research.
5/27/2024
🤖
When AI Eats Itself: On the Caveats of Data Pollution in the Era of Generative AI
Xiaodan Xing, Fadong Shi, Jiahao Huang, Yinzhe Wu, Yang Nan, Sheng Zhang, Yingying Fang, Mike Roberts, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb, Javier Del Ser, Guang Yang
0
0
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and large models are producing realistic outputs across various domains, such as images, text, speech, and music. Creating these advanced generative models requires significant resources, particularly large and high-quality datasets. To minimize training expenses, many algorithm developers use data created by the models themselves as a cost-effective training solution. However, not all synthetic data effectively improve model performance, necessitating a strategic balance in the use of real versus synthetic data to optimize outcomes. Currently, the previously well-controlled integration of real and synthetic data is becoming uncontrollable. The widespread and unregulated dissemination of synthetic data online leads to the contamination of datasets traditionally compiled through web scraping, now mixed with unlabeled synthetic data. This trend portends a future where generative AI systems may increasingly rely blindly on consuming self-generated data, raising concerns about model performance and ethical issues. What will happen if generative AI continuously consumes itself without discernment? What measures can we take to mitigate the potential adverse effects? There is a significant gap in the scientific literature regarding the impact of synthetic data use in generative AI, particularly in terms of the fusion of multimodal information. To address this research gap, this review investigates the consequences of integrating synthetic data blindly on training generative AI on both image and text modalities and explores strategies to mitigate these effects. The goal is to offer a comprehensive view of synthetic data's role, advocating for a balanced approach to its use and exploring practices that promote the sustainable development of generative AI technologies in the era of large models.
5/17/2024
📈
The Influencer Next Door: How Misinformation Creators Use GenAI
Amelia Hassoun, Ariel Abonizio, Katy Osborn, Cameron Wu, Beth Goldberg
0
0
Advances in generative AI (GenAI) have raised concerns about detecting and discerning AI-generated content from human-generated content. Most existing literature assumes a paradigm where 'expert' organized disinformation creators and flawed AI models deceive 'ordinary' users. Based on longitudinal ethnographic research with misinformation creators and consumers between 2022-2023, we instead find that GenAI supports bricolage work, where non-experts increasingly use GenAI to remix, repackage, and (re)produce content to meet their personal needs and desires. This research yielded four key findings: First, participants primarily used GenAI for creation, rather than truth-seeking. Second, a spreading 'influencer millionaire' narrative drove participants to become content creators, using GenAI as a productivity tool to generate a volume of (often misinformative) content. Third, GenAI lowered the barrier to entry for content creation across modalities, enticing consumers to become creators and significantly increasing existing creators' output. Finally, participants used Gen AI to learn and deploy marketing tactics to expand engagement and monetize their content. We argue for shifting analysis from the public as consumers of AI content to bricoleurs who use GenAI creatively, often without a detailed understanding of its underlying technology. We analyze how these understudied emergent uses of GenAI produce new or accelerated misinformation harms, and their implications for AI products, platforms and policies.
6/19/2024