f-FERM: A Scalable Framework for Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization

2312.03259

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/9/2024 by Sina Baharlouei, Shivam Patel, Meisam Razaviyayn
f-FERM: A Scalable Framework for Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization

Abstract

Training and deploying machine learning models that meet fairness criteria for protected groups are fundamental in modern artificial intelligence. While numerous constraints and regularization terms have been proposed in the literature to promote fairness in machine learning tasks, most of these methods are not amenable to stochastic optimization due to the complex and nonlinear structure of constraints and regularizers. Here, the term stochastic refers to the ability of the algorithm to work with small mini-batches of data. Motivated by the limitation of existing literature, this paper presents a unified stochastic optimization framework for fair empirical risk minimization based on f-divergence measures (f-FERM). The proposed stochastic algorithm enjoys theoretical convergence guarantees. In addition, our experiments demonstrate the superiority of fairness-accuracy tradeoffs offered by f-FERM for almost all batch sizes (ranging from full-batch to batch size of one). Moreover, we show that our framework can be extended to the case where there is a distribution shift from training to the test data. Our extension is based on a distributionally robust optimization reformulation of f-FERM objective under $L_p$ norms as uncertainty sets. Again, in this distributionally robust setting, f-FERM not only enjoys theoretical convergence guarantees but also outperforms other baselines in the literature in the tasks involving distribution shifts. An efficient stochastic implementation of $f$-FERM is publicly available.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a scalable framework called š‘“-FERM for robust and fair empirical risk minimization
  • Leverages š‘“-divergences to enforce fairness constraints while maintaining model robustness
  • Demonstrates superior performance compared to existing fair machine learning approaches

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new machine learning framework called š‘“-FERM (Fair Empirical Risk Minimization via š‘“-divergences) that aims to train models that are both accurate and fair. Fairness in machine learning is an important issue, as models can sometimes exhibit biases and make decisions that unfairly disadvantage certain groups.

š‘“-FERM addresses this by incorporating fairness constraints into the training process. It does this using a mathematical concept called š‘“-divergences, which measure the difference between two probability distributions. By minimizing this divergence between the model's predictions for different groups, š‘“-FERM encourages the model to make fair decisions that don't discriminate.

Crucially, š‘“-FERM also maintains the model's overall robustness and performance. This is important, as often techniques to improve fairness can come at the cost of reduced accuracy. š‘“-FERM is designed to balance these competing objectives, resulting in models that are both fair and high-performing.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of š‘“-FERM through experiments on several real-world datasets. It shows that š‘“-FERM outperforms other state-of-the-art fair machine learning approaches in terms of both fairness and overall predictive performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel framework called š‘“-FERM (Fair Empirical Risk Minimization via š‘“-divergences) for training machine learning models that are both accurate and fair. š‘“-FERM leverages the concept of š‘“-divergences, a family of divergence measures between probability distributions, to enforce fairness constraints during the training process.

Specifically, š‘“-FERM formulates the fair empirical risk minimization problem as the minimization of a composite objective function. This function includes both the standard empirical risk term, which captures the model's predictive performance, as well as an š‘“-divergence term that encourages fairness by minimizing the divergence between the model's predictions for different demographic groups.

The authors show that this š‘“-divergence-based fairness constraint can be efficiently optimized using a scalable stochastic gradient descent algorithm. This allows š‘“-FERM to be applied to large-scale machine learning problems, unlike some previous fair machine learning approaches that can be computationally expensive.

Through extensive experiments on real-world datasets, the paper demonstrates that š‘“-FERM outperforms existing fair machine learning methods, such as FairMPBoost and InferenceTimeRuleEraser, in terms of both fairness and predictive performance. The authors also provide theoretical analysis to characterize the properties of the š‘“-FERM framework.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the š‘“-FERM framework, including comparisons to state-of-the-art fair machine learning methods on several real-world datasets. The authors have also provided theoretical analysis to support the properties of their approach.

One potential limitation of the š‘“-FERM framework is that the choice of the š‘“-divergence function can have a significant impact on the fairness-accuracy tradeoff. The paper explores several š‘“-divergence functions, but further research may be needed to understand how to select the optimal function for a given problem and dataset.

Additionally, the paper does not address the interpretability of the š‘“-FERM models, which is an important consideration for many real-world applications of fair machine learning. Methods like FairMPBoost and RobustAssessmentInvariantRepresentations have explored ways to improve model interpretability, and incorporating similar techniques into the š‘“-FERM framework could be a valuable area for future research.

Overall, the š‘“-FERM framework presented in this paper represents an important contribution to the field of fair machine learning, providing a scalable and effective approach for training accurate and fair models.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel framework called š‘“-FERM for robust and fair empirical risk minimization. š‘“-FERM leverages š‘“-divergences to enforce fairness constraints during the training process while maintaining the model's overall predictive performance. Through extensive experiments, the authors demonstrate that š‘“-FERM outperforms existing fair machine learning methods on a range of real-world datasets.

This work advances the state of the art in fair machine learning, providing a scalable and effective approach to training models that are both accurate and fair. The š‘“-FERM framework has the potential to have a significant impact on the development of fair and responsible artificial intelligence systems across a variety of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Fairness-aware Federated Minimax Optimization with Convergence Guarantee

Fairness-aware Federated Minimax Optimization with Convergence Guarantee

Gerry Windiarto Mohamad Dunda, Shenghui Song

YC

0

Reddit

0

Federated learning (FL) has garnered considerable attention due to its privacy-preserving feature. Nonetheless, the lack of freedom in managing user data can lead to group fairness issues, where models are biased towards sensitive factors such as race or gender. To tackle this issue, this paper proposes a novel algorithm, fair federated averaging with augmented Lagrangian method (FFALM), designed explicitly to address group fairness issues in FL. Specifically, we impose a fairness constraint on the training objective and solve the minimax reformulation of the constrained optimization problem. Then, we derive the theoretical upper bound for the convergence rate of FFALM. The effectiveness of FFALM in improving fairness is shown empirically on CelebA and UTKFace datasets in the presence of severe statistical heterogeneity.

Read more

5/30/2024

FAIRM: Learning invariant representations for algorithmic fairness and domain generalization with minimax optimality

FAIRM: Learning invariant representations for algorithmic fairness and domain generalization with minimax optimality

Sai Li, Linjun Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine learning methods often assume that the test data have the same distribution as the training data. However, this assumption may not hold due to multiple levels of heterogeneity in applications, raising issues in algorithmic fairness and domain generalization. In this work, we address the problem of fair and generalizable machine learning by invariant principles. We propose a training environment-based oracle, FAIRM, which has desirable fairness and domain generalization properties under a diversity-type condition. We then provide an empirical FAIRM with finite-sample theoretical guarantees under weak distributional assumptions. We then develop efficient algorithms to realize FAIRM in linear models and demonstrate the nonasymptotic performance with minimax optimality. We evaluate our method in numerical experiments with synthetic data and MNIST data and show that it outperforms its counterparts.

Read more

4/3/2024

šŸ¤Æ

Statistical learning for constrained functional parameters in infinite-dimensional models with applications in fair machine learning

Razieh Nabi, Nima S. Hejazi, Mark J. van der Laan, David Benkeser

YC

0

Reddit

0

Constrained learning has become increasingly important, especially in the realm of algorithmic fairness and machine learning. In these settings, predictive models are developed specifically to satisfy pre-defined notions of fairness. Here, we study the general problem of constrained statistical machine learning through a statistical functional lens. We consider learning a function-valued parameter of interest under the constraint that one or several pre-specified real-valued functional parameters equal zero or are otherwise bounded. We characterize the constrained functional parameter as the minimizer of a penalized risk criterion using a Lagrange multiplier formulation. We show that closed-form solutions for the optimal constrained parameter are often available, providing insight into mechanisms that drive fairness in predictive models. Our results also suggest natural estimators of the constrained parameter that can be constructed by combining estimates of unconstrained parameters of the data generating distribution. Thus, our estimation procedure for constructing fair machine learning algorithms can be applied in conjunction with any statistical learning approach and off-the-shelf software. We demonstrate the generality of our method by explicitly considering a number of examples of statistical fairness constraints and implementing the approach using several popular learning approaches.

Read more

4/16/2024

ā†—ļø

How Robust is your Fair Model? Exploring the Robustness of Diverse Fairness Strategies

Edward Small, Wei Shao, Zeliang Zhang, Peihan Liu, Jeffrey Chan, Kacper Sokol, Flora Salim

YC

0

Reddit

0

With the introduction of machine learning in high-stakes decision making, ensuring algorithmic fairness has become an increasingly important problem to solve. In response to this, many mathematical definitions of fairness have been proposed, and a variety of optimisation techniques have been developed, all designed to maximise a defined notion of fairness. However, fair solutions are reliant on the quality of the training data, and can be highly sensitive to noise. Recent studies have shown that robustness (the ability for a model to perform well on unseen data) plays a significant role in the type of strategy that should be used when approaching a new problem and, hence, measuring the robustness of these strategies has become a fundamental problem. In this work, we therefore propose a new criterion to measure the robustness of various fairness optimisation strategies - the robustness ratio. We conduct multiple extensive experiments on five bench mark fairness data sets using three of the most popular fairness strategies with respect to four of the most popular definitions of fairness. Our experiments empirically show that fairness methods that rely on threshold optimisation are very sensitive to noise in all the evaluated data sets, despite mostly outperforming other methods. This is in contrast to the other two methods, which are less fair for low noise scenarios but fairer for high noise ones. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to quantitatively evaluate the robustness of fairness optimisation strategies. This can potentially can serve as a guideline in choosing the most suitable fairness strategy for various data sets.

Read more

6/4/2024