Fair Incentives for Repeated Engagement

Read original: arXiv:2111.00002 - Published 7/31/2024 by Daniel Freund, Chamsi Hssaine
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper examines the problem of finding optimal monetary incentive schemes for retaining agents when their participation decisions depend on the incentives they receive.
  • The focus is on policies that fulfill two fairness properties to prevent different groups of agents from experiencing different treatment on average.
  • The problem is formulated as a high-dimensional stochastic optimization problem, which is studied through a related deterministic variant.
  • The key finding is that the optimal static solution to the deterministic variant is asymptotically optimal for the dynamic problem under fairness constraints.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the challenge of designing effective incentive schemes to retain employees or agents when their decision to participate depends on the incentives they receive. The researchers wanted to ensure these incentive schemes were fair, meaning different groups of agents wouldn't experience different treatment on average.

To study this, the researchers set up the problem as a complex, high-dimensional optimization challenge. They also looked at a simpler, related version of the problem that had deterministic, rather than random, factors. Interestingly, they found that the optimal solution for this simpler, deterministic version of the problem was also a good solution for the more complex, dynamic real-world problem - as long as the fairness constraints were maintained.

Traditionally, retention incentive schemes have focused on using differentiation to encourage repeated engagement. But the researchers showed that even without explicit discrimination, dynamic policies could inadvertently lead to unfair treatment by changing the mix of agent types in the system over time. Their work presents a solution that avoids such unintentional discrimination.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the problem of finding optimal monetary incentive schemes for agent retention as a high-dimensional stochastic optimization problem. The key challenge is that agents' participation decisions stochastically depend on the incentives they receive.

To address this, the researchers study a related deterministic variant of the problem. They show that the optimal static solution to this deterministic problem is asymptotically optimal for the original dynamic problem, under fairness constraints. This is an important result, as solving for the optimal static solution involves a non-convex optimization problem.

The researchers uncover a structural property of the deterministic problem that allows them to design a tractable, fast-converging heuristic policy. This provides a practical way to implement the asymptotically optimal solution.

Traditional retention incentive schemes have focused on using differentiation to drive repeated engagement with the system. However, the paper demonstrates that even without explicit discrimination, dynamic policies may unintentionally lead to unfair treatment by changing the composition of agent types over time.

The key contribution of this work is the presentation of an asymptotically optimal policy that avoids such discriminatory outcomes, while still providing effective incentives for agent retention.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a rigorous mathematical analysis of the incentive design problem under fairness constraints. The use of a deterministic variant to approximate the original stochastic problem is a clever approach that allows the researchers to derive analytical insights.

One potential limitation is the assumption that agents' participation decisions depend only on the incentives they receive, and not on other factors. In reality, agents may have more complex decision-making processes that consider additional variables.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the practical implementation challenges of the proposed heuristic policy. It would be useful to understand how this solution would perform in real-world scenarios with noisy data, changing market conditions, and other practical constraints.

Further research could explore the robustness of the asymptotically optimal policy to model misspecification, the incorporation of additional fairness criteria, and the extension to more complex agent decision-making processes.

Conclusion

This research paper tackles the important problem of designing effective yet fair incentive schemes for agent retention. By formulating the problem as a stochastic optimization challenge and studying a related deterministic variant, the researchers derive an asymptotically optimal policy that avoids unintentional discrimination.

The key insight is that the optimal static solution to the deterministic problem can be used to solve the original dynamic problem under fairness constraints. This allows for the development of a tractable heuristic policy that can be implemented in practice.

The findings of this work have important implications for the design of equitable incentive systems in a variety of contexts, from workforce management to consumer engagement. By considering fairness alongside efficiency, the researchers present a balanced approach that can help organizations foster more inclusive and sustainable practices.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

Fair Incentives for Repeated Engagement

Daniel Freund, Chamsi Hssaine

We study a decision-maker's problem of finding optimal monetary incentive schemes for retention when faced with agents whose participation decisions (stochastically) depend on the incentive they receive. Our focus is on policies constrained to fulfill two fairness properties that preclude outcomes wherein different groups of agents experience different treatment on average. We formulate the problem as a high-dimensional stochastic optimization problem, and study it through the use of a closely related deterministic variant. We show that the optimal static solution to this deterministic variant is asymptotically optimal for the dynamic problem under fairness constraints. Though solving for the optimal static solution gives rise to a non-convex optimization problem, we uncover a structural property that allows us to design a tractable, fast-converging heuristic policy. Traditional schemes for retention ignore fairness constraints; indeed, the goal in these is to use differentiation to incentivize repeated engagement with the system. Our work (i) shows that even in the absence of explicit discrimination, dynamic policies may unintentionally discriminate between agents of different types by varying the type composition of the system, and (ii) presents an asymptotically optimal policy to avoid such discriminatory outcomes.

Read more

7/31/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Fairness Incentives in Response to Unfair Dynamic Pricing

Jesse Thibodeau, Hadi Nekoei, Afaf Taik, Janarthanan Rajendran, Golnoosh Farnadi

The use of dynamic pricing by profit-maximizing firms gives rise to demand fairness concerns, measured by discrepancies in consumer groups' demand responses to a given pricing strategy. Notably, dynamic pricing may result in buyer distributions unreflective of those of the underlying population, which can be problematic in markets where fair representation is socially desirable. To address this, policy makers might leverage tools such as taxation and subsidy to adapt policy mechanisms dependent upon their social objective. In this paper, we explore the potential for AI methods to assist such intervention strategies. To this end, we design a basic simulated economy, wherein we introduce a dynamic social planner (SP) to generate corporate taxation schedules geared to incentivizing firms towards adopting fair pricing behaviours, and to use the collected tax budget to subsidize consumption among underrepresented groups. To cover a range of possible policy scenarios, we formulate our social planner's learning problem as a multi-armed bandit, a contextual bandit and finally as a full reinforcement learning (RL) problem, evaluating welfare outcomes from each case. To alleviate the difficulty in retaining meaningful tax rates that apply to less frequently occurring brackets, we introduce FairReplayBuffer, which ensures that our RL agent samples experiences uniformly across a discretized fairness space. We find that, upon deploying a learned tax and redistribution policy, social welfare improves on that of the fairness-agnostic baseline, and approaches that of the analytically optimal fairness-aware baseline for the multi-armed and contextual bandit settings, and surpassing it by 13.19% in the full RL setting.

Read more

4/24/2024

Long-Term Fairness in Sequential Multi-Agent Selection with Positive Reinforcement
Total Score

0

Long-Term Fairness in Sequential Multi-Agent Selection with Positive Reinforcement

Bhagyashree Puranik, Ozgur Guldogan, Upamanyu Madhow, Ramtin Pedarsani

While much of the rapidly growing literature on fair decision-making focuses on metrics for one-shot decisions, recent work has raised the intriguing possibility of designing sequential decision-making to positively impact long-term social fairness. In selection processes such as college admissions or hiring, biasing slightly towards applicants from under-represented groups is hypothesized to provide positive feedback that increases the pool of under-represented applicants in future selection rounds, thus enhancing fairness in the long term. In this paper, we examine this hypothesis and its consequences in a setting in which multiple agents are selecting from a common pool of applicants. We propose the Multi-agent Fair-Greedy policy, that balances greedy score maximization and fairness. Under this policy, we prove that the resource pool and the admissions converge to a long-term fairness target set by the agents when the score distributions across the groups in the population are identical. We provide empirical evidence of existence of equilibria under non-identical score distributions through synthetic and adapted real-world datasets. We then sound a cautionary note for more complex applicant pool evolution models, under which uncoordinated behavior by the agents can cause negative reinforcement, leading to a reduction in the fraction of under-represented applicants. Our results indicate that, while positive reinforcement is a promising mechanism for long-term fairness, policies must be designed carefully to be robust to variations in the evolution model, with a number of open issues that remain to be explored by algorithm designers, social scientists, and policymakers.

Read more

7/11/2024

Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design
Total Score

0

Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design

Alireza Fallah, Michael I. Jordan, Annie Ulichney

We consider a dynamic mechanism design problem where an auctioneer sells an indivisible good to two groups of buyers in every round, for a total of $T$ rounds. The auctioneer aims to maximize their discounted overall revenue while adhering to a fairness constraint that guarantees a minimum average allocation for each group. We begin by studying the static case ($T=1$) and establish that the optimal mechanism involves two types of subsidization: one that increases the overall probability of allocation to all buyers, and another that favors the group which otherwise has a lower probability of winning the item. We then extend our results to the dynamic case by characterizing a set of recursive functions that determine the optimal allocation and payments in each round. Notably, our results establish that in the dynamic case, the seller, on the one hand, commits to a participation reward to incentivize truth-telling, and on the other hand, charges an entry fee for every round. Moreover, the optimal allocation once more involves subsidization in favor of one group, where the extent of subsidization depends on the difference in future utilities for both the seller and buyers when allocating the item to one group versus the other. Finally, we present an approximation scheme to solve the recursive equations and determine an approximately optimal and fair allocation efficiently.

Read more

6/18/2024