Adaptive Incentive Design with Learning Agents
2405.16716
0
0
🏅
Abstract
How can the system operator learn an incentive mechanism that achieves social optimality based on limited information about the agents' behavior, who are dynamically updating their strategies? To answer this question, we propose an emph{adaptive} incentive mechanism. This mechanism updates the incentives of agents based on the feedback of each agent's externality, evaluated as the difference between the player's marginal cost and society's marginal cost at each time step. The proposed mechanism updates the incentives on a slower timescale compared to the agents' learning dynamics, resulting in a two-timescale coupled dynamical system. Notably, this mechanism is agnostic to the specific learning dynamics used by agents to update their strategies. We show that any fixed point of this adaptive incentive mechanism corresponds to the optimal incentive mechanism, ensuring that the Nash equilibrium coincides with the socially optimal strategy. Additionally, we provide sufficient conditions that guarantee the convergence of the adaptive incentive mechanism to a fixed point. Our results apply to both atomic and non-atomic games. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed mechanism, we verify the convergence conditions in two practically relevant games: atomic networked quadratic aggregative games and non-atomic network routing games.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Explores an adaptive incentive design framework for incentivizing agents with learning capabilities in a multi-agent environment
- Aims to maximize a social objective function by dynamically adjusting incentives based on agents' evolving behaviors and preferences
- Builds on existing work in socially optimal energy usage via adaptive pricing, algorithmic decision-making under agents' persistent improvement, and structured reinforcement learning for incentivized stochastic covert optimization
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents an adaptive incentive design framework that aims to incentivize agents with learning capabilities to behave in a way that maximizes a desired social objective. In a multi-agent environment, the agents' behaviors and preferences may evolve over time. The framework dynamically adjusts the incentives provided to the agents based on their changing behaviors, with the goal of steering the agents towards actions that collectively benefit the overall system.
This builds on previous research in areas such as socially optimal energy usage via adaptive pricing, where the goal was to design adaptive pricing mechanisms to incentivize energy consumers to use energy more efficiently. Similarly, the current work aims to create adaptive incentive mechanisms that can guide the decision-making of learning agents towards socially desirable outcomes, even as the agents' preferences and behaviors change over time.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an adaptive incentive design framework that models the interactions between a central planner (or designer) and a set of learning agents in a multi-agent environment. The central planner's goal is to maximize a social objective function by dynamically adjusting the incentives provided to the agents.
The framework assumes that the agents are self-interested and have the ability to learn and adapt their behaviors over time. The central planner does not have complete information about the agents' preferences or their learning processes. Instead, the planner must infer the agents' evolving behaviors and preferences through observations and interactions.
To achieve this, the framework employs a feedback loop where the planner observes the agents' actions, updates its beliefs about their preferences, and then adjusts the incentives accordingly. The agents, in turn, observe the updated incentives and modify their behaviors to maximize their own utilities, which are influenced by both their intrinsic preferences and the provided incentives.
The paper investigates various algorithms and techniques, such as structured reinforcement learning for incentivized stochastic covert optimization and incentivizing social information sharing in routing games, to enable the central planner to effectively learn about the agents' preferences and design the appropriate incentives.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an interesting and ambitious framework for adaptive incentive design in multi-agent environments. However, it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The framework assumes that the central planner can accurately observe the agents' actions and update its beliefs about their preferences. In practice, this may be challenging, especially in complex environments with incomplete information.
- The paper does not address the potential for strategic behavior from the agents, who may try to manipulate the incentive system to their own advantage. Addressing such strategic considerations would be an important direction for future research.
- The proposed algorithms and techniques, while theoretically grounded, may face scalability challenges when applied to large-scale, real-world scenarios. Further research is needed to explore the practical feasibility and performance of the framework in such settings.
Moreover, one could argue that the focus on maximizing a centralized social objective function may not always align with the interests of individual agents. Exploring mechanisms that can better balance individual and collective goals could be a valuable extension of this work.
Conclusion
The adaptive incentive design framework presented in this paper represents an important step towards developing effective mechanisms for guiding the behaviors of learning agents in multi-agent environments. By dynamically adjusting incentives based on the agents' evolving preferences, the framework aims to steer the system towards socially desirable outcomes.
While the paper highlights several limitations and areas for further research, the core ideas have the potential to inform the design of adaptive incentive systems in a wide range of applications, from energy management and transportation to active learning methods for solving competitive multi-agent problems. As the field of multi-agent systems continues to advance, the insights and techniques presented in this work may contribute to the development of more sophisticated and effective incentive mechanisms for complex, real-world environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Socially Optimal Energy Usage via Adaptive Pricing
Jiayi Li, Matthew Motoki, Baosen Zhang
0
0
A central challenge in using price signals to coordinate the electricity consumption of a group of users is the operator's lack of knowledge of the users due to privacy concerns. In this paper, we develop a two-time-scale incentive mechanism that alternately updates between the users and a system operator. As long as the users can optimize their own consumption subject to a given price, the operator does not need to know or attempt to learn any private information of the users for price design. Users adjust their consumption following the price and the system redesigns the price based on the users' consumption. We show that under mild assumptions, this iterative process converges to the social welfare solution. In particular, the cost of the users need not always be convex and its consumption can be the output of a machine learning-based load control algorithm.
4/1/2024
🌿
Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets
Xiaowu Dai, Wenlu Xu, Yuan Qi, Michael I. Jordan
0
0
Online platforms in the Internet Economy commonly incorporate recommender systems that recommend products (or arms) to users (or agents). A key challenge in this domain arises from myopic agents who are naturally incentivized to exploit by choosing the optimal arm based on current information, rather than exploring various alternatives to gather information that benefits the collective. We propose a novel recommender system that aligns with agents' incentives while achieving asymptotically optimal performance, as measured by regret in repeated interactions. Our framework models this incentive-aware system as a multi-agent bandit problem in two-sided markets, where the interactions of agents and arms are facilitated by recommender systems on online platforms. This model incorporates incentive constraints induced by agents' opportunity costs. In scenarios where opportunity costs are known to the platform, we show the existence of an incentive-compatible recommendation algorithm. This algorithm pools recommendations between a genuinely good arm and an unknown arm using a randomized and adaptive strategy. Moreover, when these opportunity costs are unknown, we introduce an algorithm that randomly pools recommendations across all arms, utilizing the cumulative loss from each arm as feedback for strategic exploration. We demonstrate that both algorithms satisfy an ex-post fairness criterion, which protects agents from over-exploitation. All code for using the proposed algorithms and reproducing results is made available on GitHub.
6/19/2024
Paying to Do Better: Games with Payments between Learning Agents
Yoav Kolumbus, Joe Halpern, 'Eva Tardos
0
0
In repeated games, such as auctions, players typically use learning algorithms to choose their actions. The use of such autonomous learning agents has become widespread on online platforms. In this paper, we explore the impact of players incorporating monetary transfers into their agents' algorithms, aiming to incentivize behavior in their favor. Our focus is on understanding when players have incentives to make use of monetary transfers, how these payments affect learning dynamics, and what the implications are for welfare and its distribution among the players. We propose a simple game-theoretic model to capture such scenarios. Our results on general games show that in a broad class of games, players benefit from letting their learning agents make payments to other learners during the game dynamics, and that in many cases, this kind of behavior improves welfare for all players. Our results on first- and second-price auctions show that in equilibria of the ``payment policy game,'' the agents' dynamics can reach strong collusive outcomes with low revenue for the auctioneer. These results highlight a challenge for mechanism design in systems where automated learning agents can benefit from interacting with their peers outside the boundaries of the mechanism.
6/3/2024
🌀
Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvement
Tian Xie, Xuwei Tan, Xueru Zhang
0
0
This paper studies algorithmic decision-making under human's strategic behavior, where a decision maker uses an algorithm to make decisions about human agents, and the latter with information about the algorithm may exert effort strategically and improve to receive favorable decisions. Unlike prior works that assume agents benefit from their efforts immediately, we consider realistic scenarios where the impacts of these efforts are persistent and agents benefit from efforts by making improvements gradually. We first develop a dynamic model to characterize persistent improvements and based on this construct a Stackelberg game to model the interplay between agents and the decision-maker. We analytically characterize the equilibrium strategies and identify conditions under which agents have incentives to improve. With the dynamics, we then study how the decision-maker can design an optimal policy to incentivize the largest improvements inside the agent population. We also extend the model to settings where 1) agents may be dishonest and game the algorithm into making favorable but erroneous decisions; 2) honest efforts are forgettable and not sufficient to guarantee persistent improvements. With the extended models, we further examine conditions under which agents prefer honest efforts over dishonest behavior and the impacts of forgettable efforts.
5/6/2024