Fairness, Accuracy, and Unreliable Data
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This thesis examines three areas aimed at improving the reliability of machine learning: fairness in machine learning, strategic classification, and algorithmic robustness.
- Each of these domains has unique properties or structures that can complicate the learning process.
- A central theme is recognizing when a basic empirical risk minimization algorithm may be misleading or ineffective due to a mismatch between classical learning theory assumptions and the real-world data distribution.
- Theoretical understanding in these areas can guide best practices and enable the design of effective, reliable, and robust machine learning systems.
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper investigates three key areas to improve the reliability of machine learning systems. These include fairness, strategic classification, and algorithmic robustness.
Each of these domains has unique properties that can make machine learning more challenging. For example, real-world data may not match the assumptions made in classical machine learning theory. A simple algorithm that works well in theory may perform poorly in practice due to these mismatches.
By developing a deeper theoretical understanding of these issues, the researchers hope to guide best practices and enable the design of machine learning systems that are effective, reliable, and robust in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The thesis focuses on three key areas that can impact the reliability of machine learning systems:
Fairness in Machine Learning: This involves ensuring machine learning models treat different groups fairly and do not exhibit biases. The unique structure and properties of fairness problems can complicate the learning process.
Strategic Classification: This refers to situations where individuals may strategically modify their features to influence the model's predictions. This strategic behavior can disrupt standard learning approaches.
Algorithmic Robustness: This deals with ensuring machine learning models are resilient to distribution shift, adversarial examples, and other perturbations that may occur in real-world deployment. Certain data distributions and problem structures can make models more vulnerable.
The central theme is recognizing when the assumptions of classical machine learning theory may not align with the realities of real-world data and problem domains. Developing a stronger theoretical understanding in these areas can inform the design of more reliable and robust machine learning systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a high-level overview of three important areas in machine learning reliability, but does not delve deeply into the technical details or specific solutions proposed in the thesis.
Some potential limitations or areas for further research include:
- How do the theoretical insights translate into practical guidelines or tools for machine learning practitioners?
- What are the key open challenges or limitations that remain in each of these domains?
- Are there tradeoffs or tensions between the different reliability objectives (fairness, robustness, strategic classification) that need to be navigated?
Overall, the paper successfully motivates the importance of these reliability-focused research directions, but readers may want additional context and analysis to fully appreciate the significance and impact of the work.
Conclusion
This thesis explores three crucial areas - fairness, strategic classification, and algorithmic robustness - that are essential for improving the reliability of machine learning systems.
By developing a stronger theoretical understanding of the unique properties and challenges in each of these domains, the researchers aim to guide best practices and enable the design of machine learning models that are effective, fair, and resilient in real-world deployment.
While the paper provides a high-level overview, further details and insights from the full thesis could shed more light on the practical implications and key open research questions in these important areas of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
Fairness, Accuracy, and Unreliable Data
Kevin Stangl
This thesis investigates three areas targeted at improving the reliability of machine learning; fairness in machine learning, strategic classification, and algorithmic robustness. Each of these domains has special properties or structure that can complicate learning. A theme throughout this thesis is thinking about ways in which a `plain' empirical risk minimization algorithm will be misleading or ineffective because of a mis-match between classical learning theory assumptions and specific properties of some data distribution in the wild. Theoretical understanding in eachof these domains can help guide best practices and allow for the design of effective, reliable, and robust systems.
Read more8/30/2024
✨
0
Between Randomness and Arbitrariness: Some Lessons for Reliable Machine Learning at Scale
A. Feder Cooper
To develop rigorous knowledge about ML models -- and the systems in which they are embedded -- we need reliable measurements. But reliable measurement is fundamentally challenging, and touches on issues of reproducibility, scalability, uncertainty quantification, epistemology, and more. This dissertation addresses criteria needed to take reliability seriously: both criteria for designing meaningful metrics, and for methodologies that ensure that we can dependably and efficiently measure these metrics at scale and in practice. In doing so, this dissertation articulates a research vision for a new field of scholarship at the intersection of machine learning, law, and policy. Within this frame, we cover topics that fit under three different themes: (1) quantifying and mitigating sources of arbitrariness in ML, (2) taming randomness in uncertainty estimation and optimization algorithms, in order to achieve scalability without sacrificing reliability, and (3) providing methods for evaluating generative-AI systems, with specific focuses on quantifying memorization in language models and training latent diffusion models on open-licensed data. By making contributions in these three themes, this dissertation serves as an empirical proof by example that research on reliable measurement for machine learning is intimately and inescapably bound up with research in law and policy. These different disciplines pose similar research questions about reliable measurement in machine learning. They are, in fact, two complementary sides of the same research vision, which, broadly construed, aims to construct machine-learning systems that cohere with broader societal values.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Uncertainty-based Fairness Measures
Selim Kuzucu, Jiaee Cheong, Hatice Gunes, Sinan Kalkan
Unfair predictions of machine learning (ML) models impede their broad acceptance in real-world settings. Tackling this arduous challenge first necessitates defining what it means for an ML model to be fair. This has been addressed by the ML community with various measures of fairness that depend on the prediction outcomes of the ML models, either at the group level or the individual level. These fairness measures are limited in that they utilize point predictions, neglecting their variances, or uncertainties, making them susceptible to noise, missingness and shifts in data. In this paper, we first show that an ML model may appear to be fair with existing point-based fairness measures but biased against a demographic group in terms of prediction uncertainties. Then, we introduce new fairness measures based on different types of uncertainties, namely, aleatoric uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. We demonstrate on many datasets that (i) our uncertainty-based measures are complementary to existing measures of fairness, and (ii) they provide more insights about the underlying issues leading to bias.
Read more8/30/2024
↗️
0
How Robust is your Fair Model? Exploring the Robustness of Diverse Fairness Strategies
Edward Small, Wei Shao, Zeliang Zhang, Peihan Liu, Jeffrey Chan, Kacper Sokol, Flora Salim
With the introduction of machine learning in high-stakes decision making, ensuring algorithmic fairness has become an increasingly important problem to solve. In response to this, many mathematical definitions of fairness have been proposed, and a variety of optimisation techniques have been developed, all designed to maximise a defined notion of fairness. However, fair solutions are reliant on the quality of the training data, and can be highly sensitive to noise. Recent studies have shown that robustness (the ability for a model to perform well on unseen data) plays a significant role in the type of strategy that should be used when approaching a new problem and, hence, measuring the robustness of these strategies has become a fundamental problem. In this work, we therefore propose a new criterion to measure the robustness of various fairness optimisation strategies - the robustness ratio. We conduct multiple extensive experiments on five bench mark fairness data sets using three of the most popular fairness strategies with respect to four of the most popular definitions of fairness. Our experiments empirically show that fairness methods that rely on threshold optimisation are very sensitive to noise in all the evaluated data sets, despite mostly outperforming other methods. This is in contrast to the other two methods, which are less fair for low noise scenarios but fairer for high noise ones. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to quantitatively evaluate the robustness of fairness optimisation strategies. This can potentially can serve as a guideline in choosing the most suitable fairness strategy for various data sets.
Read more6/4/2024