On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms
0
✨
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant improvements across many scientific fields.
- However, there are growing concerns about the trustworthiness of AI technologies.
- The research community has focused on developing trustworthy AI algorithms.
- But these algorithms rely heavily on the data used during their development.
- Any flaws in the data can directly translate into issues with the algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the importance of responsible machine learning datasets and proposes a framework to evaluate datasets through a responsible rubric. While previous work has focused on evaluating the trustworthiness of AI algorithms after they are developed, this research looks at the data component separately to understand its role.
The researchers examine datasets through the lens of fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance. They surveyed over 100 datasets and found that none of them are immune to issues in these areas. The paper provides recommendations for constructing future datasets and modifies the "datasheets for datasets" approach with important additions.
As governments around the world implement data protection laws, the researchers believe the scientific community needs to revise its methods for creating datasets used in AI competitions and benchmarks.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a framework to evaluate machine learning datasets based on the principles of fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance. They surveyed over 100 datasets and selected 60 for in-depth analysis.
The fairness evaluation looked at issues like dataset representation, the presence of stereotypes, and potential biases. The privacy assessment examined the potential for re-identification of individuals in the data. Regulatory compliance was evaluated based on factors like data collection methods and consent procedures.
Through this analysis, the researchers found that none of the 60 datasets were free from issues related to fairness, privacy, and compliance. They provide recommendations for improving dataset documentation and construction to address these concerns.
The paper also introduces modifications to the "datasheets for datasets" approach, adding important new elements for responsible dataset development.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their survey of datasets was not exhaustive and that there may be other datasets not included in their analysis. They also note that the evaluation framework they propose requires further refinement and validation.
One potential limitation is that the framework relies heavily on human judgment and interpretation, which can introduce subjective biases. Automating parts of the evaluation process could help improve consistency and objectivity.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the root causes of the issues identified in the datasets, such as the incentives and practices within the research community that may contribute to these problems. Further exploration of these underlying factors could provide valuable insights.
Overall, the research highlights the critical importance of responsible data practices in the development of trustworthy AI systems. The proposed framework and recommendations serve as a valuable starting point for the community to address these challenges.
Conclusion
This study emphasizes the need for the scientific community to re-evaluate its approach to creating datasets used in AI research and development. The researchers found that even widely used datasets are not immune to issues related to fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance.
By providing a framework for assessing datasets through a responsible lens and recommending improvements to dataset documentation, the paper aims to drive the development of more trustworthy AI systems. As governments continue to implement stricter data protection laws, the need for these changes becomes increasingly urgent.
The research calls for a fundamental shift in the way the scientific community approaches dataset creation, with a greater emphasis on ethical and responsible practices. This is a crucial step towards building AI systems that are transparent, accountable, and truly beneficial to society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✨
0
On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms
Surbhi Mittal, Kartik Thakral, Richa Singh, Mayank Vatsa, Tamar Glaser, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Tal Hassner
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made its way into various scientific fields, providing astonishing improvements over existing algorithms for a wide variety of tasks. In recent years, there have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies. The scientific community has focused on the development of trustworthy AI algorithms. However, machine and deep learning algorithms, popular in the AI community today, depend heavily on the data used during their development. These learning algorithms identify patterns in the data, learning the behavioral objective. Any flaws in the data have the potential to translate directly into algorithms. In this study, we discuss the importance of Responsible Machine Learning Datasets and propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric. While existing work focuses on the post-hoc evaluation of algorithms for their trustworthiness, we provide a framework that considers the data component separately to understand its role in the algorithm. We discuss responsible datasets through the lens of fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance and provide recommendations for constructing future datasets. After surveying over 100 datasets, we use 60 datasets for analysis and demonstrate that none of these datasets is immune to issues of fairness, privacy preservation, and regulatory compliance. We provide modifications to the ``datasheets for datasets with important additions for improved dataset documentation. With governments around the world regularizing data protection laws, the method for the creation of datasets in the scientific community requires revision. We believe this study is timely and relevant in today's era of AI.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Building Better Datasets: Seven Recommendations for Responsible Design from Dataset Creators
Will Orr, Kate Crawford
The increasing demand for high-quality datasets in machine learning has raised concerns about the ethical and responsible creation of these datasets. Dataset creators play a crucial role in developing responsible practices, yet their perspectives and expertise have not yet been highlighted in the current literature. In this paper, we bridge this gap by presenting insights from a qualitative study that included interviewing 18 leading dataset creators about the current state of the field. We shed light on the challenges and considerations faced by dataset creators, and our findings underscore the potential for deeper collaboration, knowledge sharing, and collective development. Through a close analysis of their perspectives, we share seven central recommendations for improving responsible dataset creation, including issues such as data quality, documentation, privacy and consent, and how to mitigate potential harms from unintended use cases. By fostering critical reflection and sharing the experiences of dataset creators, we aim to promote responsible dataset creation practices and develop a nuanced understanding of this crucial but often undervalued aspect of machine learning research.
Read more9/4/2024
0
FAIR Enough: How Can We Develop and Assess a FAIR-Compliant Dataset for Large Language Models' Training?
Shaina Raza, Shardul Ghuge, Chen Ding, Elham Dolatabadi, Deval Pandya
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the necessity for ethical considerations and data integrity in AI development, particularly emphasizing the role of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles. While these principles are crucial for ethical data stewardship, their specific application in the context of LLM training data remains an under-explored area. This research gap is the focus of our study, which begins with an examination of existing literature to underline the importance of FAIR principles in managing data for LLM training. Building upon this, we propose a novel framework designed to integrate FAIR principles into the LLM development lifecycle. A contribution of our work is the development of a comprehensive checklist intended to guide researchers and developers in applying FAIR data principles consistently across the model development process. The utility and effectiveness of our framework are validated through a case study on creating a FAIR-compliant dataset aimed at detecting and mitigating biases in LLMs. We present this framework to the community as a tool to foster the creation of technologically advanced, ethically grounded, and socially responsible AI models.
Read more4/4/2024
📊
0
Lazy Data Practices Harm Fairness Research
Jan Simson, Alessandro Fabris, Christoph Kern
Data practices shape research and practice on fairness in machine learning (fair ML). Critical data studies offer important reflections and critiques for the responsible advancement of the field by highlighting shortcomings and proposing recommendations for improvement. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of fair ML datasets, demonstrating how unreflective yet common practices hinder the reach and reliability of algorithmic fairness findings. We systematically study protected information encoded in tabular datasets and their usage in 280 experiments across 142 publications. Our analyses identify three main areas of concern: (1) a textbf{lack of representation for certain protected attributes} in both data and evaluations; (2) the widespread textbf{exclusion of minorities} during data preprocessing; and (3) textbf{opaque data processing} threatening the generalization of fairness research. By conducting exemplary analyses on the utilization of prominent datasets, we demonstrate how unreflective data decisions disproportionately affect minority groups, fairness metrics, and resultant model comparisons. Additionally, we identify supplementary factors such as limitations in publicly available data, privacy considerations, and a general lack of awareness, which exacerbate these challenges. To address these issues, we propose a set of recommendations for data usage in fairness research centered on transparency and responsible inclusion. This study underscores the need for a critical reevaluation of data practices in fair ML and offers directions to improve both the sourcing and usage of datasets.
Read more6/21/2024