Fairness and Bias in Multimodal AI: A Survey
2406.19097
0
0
🏷️
Abstract
The importance of addressing fairness and bias in artificial intelligence (AI) systems cannot be over-emphasized. Mainstream media has been awashed with news of incidents around stereotypes and bias in many of these systems in recent years. In this survey, we fill a gap with regards to the minimal study of fairness and bias in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) compared to Large Language Models (LLMs), providing 50 examples of datasets and models along with the challenges affecting them; we identify a new category of quantifying bias (preuse), in addition to the two well-known ones in the literature: intrinsic and extrinsic; we critically discuss the various ways researchers are addressing these challenges. Our method involved two slightly different search queries on Google Scholar, which revealed that 33,400 and 538,000 links are the results for the terms Fairness and bias in Large Multimodal Models and Fairness and bias in Large Language Models, respectively. We believe this work contributes to filling this gap and providing insight to researchers and other stakeholders on ways to address the challenge of fairness and bias in multimodal A!.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of fairness and bias in multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
- The authors explore the complexities and challenges of ensuring fairness and mitigating biases in multimodal AI, which combines multiple data modalities like text, images, and audio.
- The survey covers key topics, such as defining fairness and bias in AI, identifying biases in multimodal systems, and the inherent trade-offs between fairness and other desirable AI properties.
- The paper also discusses various techniques for quantifying and mitigating unimodal and multimodal biases and the challenges of achieving fair representations.
Plain English Explanation
This paper tackles the important issue of fairness and bias in multimodal AI systems. Multimodal AI refers to systems that can process and combine different types of data, such as text, images, and audio, to make decisions or generate outputs.
The authors explain that ensuring fairness and preventing harmful biases in these complex AI systems is a major challenge. Biases can creep in from the training data, the algorithms used, or the way the system is designed and deployed. The paper explores how to define and measure fairness in the context of multimodal AI, and the trade-offs involved in trying to achieve fairness alongside other desirable AI properties.
The researchers also describe various techniques that have been developed to identify, quantify, and mitigate biases in multimodal AI models. This includes methods for analyzing the individual modalities as well as the interactions between them. However, the paper notes that there are still significant hurdles to overcome in order to create truly fair and unbiased multimodal AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing a general overview of fairness and bias in AI systems. It discusses how bias can arise from factors like the training data, model architecture, and real-world deployment, and how this can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. The authors then dive deeper into the specific challenges of fairness in multimodal AI.
One key challenge is that multimodal systems involve the combination of multiple data modalities, each of which may have its own biases. The paper explores techniques for quantifying and mitigating unimodal biases as well as the additional complexities that arise when these modalities interact.
The authors also examine the inherent trade-offs between fairness and other desirable AI properties, such as accuracy, interpretability, and robustness. They discuss how achieving fair representations in multimodal AI can be particularly challenging due to these competing objectives.
Throughout the survey, the paper reviews a range of debiasing techniques that have been proposed in the literature, including data augmentation, adversarial training, and causal modeling approaches. The authors also highlight open research questions and areas for further investigation.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-structured overview of the current state of research on fairness and bias in multimodal AI. The authors do an excellent job of highlighting the unique challenges posed by the combination of multiple data modalities and the complex interactions between them.
One limitation of the survey is that it primarily focuses on technical approaches to addressing fairness and bias, with less discussion of the broader societal and ethical implications. While the paper does touch on the trade-offs between fairness and other AI properties, it could have delved deeper into the real-world consequences of biased multimodal systems and the importance of holistic, interdisciplinary solutions.
Additionally, the paper acknowledges that many of the proposed debiasing techniques have been evaluated on relatively narrow, controlled datasets and tasks. More research is needed to understand how these methods perform in diverse, real-world scenarios and their long-term effectiveness in maintaining fairness over time.
Overall, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working to address fairness and bias in multimodal AI. However, continued collaboration across disciplines and a commitment to responsible AI development will be crucial in order to realize the full potential of these powerful technologies while mitigating their societal risks.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey paper highlights the critical importance of addressing fairness and bias in multimodal AI systems. The authors provide a thorough overview of the key challenges, trade-offs, and emerging techniques for quantifying and mitigating biases in these complex, multi-faceted models.
While significant progress has been made in this area, the paper underscores that there is still much work to be done to create truly fair and unbiased multimodal AI. Ongoing research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a strong commitment to responsible AI development will be essential in order to unlock the full benefits of these technologies while safeguarding against potential harms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
4/3/2024
Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Mental Health Analysis with Large Language Models
Yuqing Wang, Yun Zhao, Sara Alessandra Keller, Anne de Hond, Marieke M. van Buchem, Malvika Pillai, Tina Hernandez-Boussard
0
0
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated strong capabilities across various applications, including mental health analysis. However, existing studies have focused on predictive performance, leaving the critical issue of fairness underexplored, posing significant risks to vulnerable populations. Despite acknowledging potential biases, previous works have lacked thorough investigations into these biases and their impacts. To address this gap, we systematically evaluate biases across seven social factors (e.g., gender, age, religion) using ten LLMs with different prompting methods on eight diverse mental health datasets. Our results show that GPT-4 achieves the best overall balance in performance and fairness among LLMs, although it still lags behind domain-specific models like MentalRoBERTa in some cases. Additionally, our tailored fairness-aware prompts can effectively mitigate bias in mental health predictions, highlighting the great potential for fair analysis in this field.
6/21/2024
✅
The Impossibility of Fair LLMs
Jacy Anthis, Kristian Lum, Michael Ekstrand, Avi Feller, Alexander D'Amour, Chenhao Tan
0
0
The need for fair AI is increasingly clear in the era of general-purpose systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs). However, the increasing complexity of human-AI interaction and its social impacts have raised questions of how fairness standards could be applied. Here, we review the technical frameworks that machine learning researchers have used to evaluate fairness, such as group fairness and fair representations, and find that their application to LLMs faces inherent limitations. We show that each framework either does not logically extend to LLMs or presents a notion of fairness that is intractable for LLMs, primarily due to the multitudes of populations affected, sensitive attributes, and use cases. To address these challenges, we develop guidelines for the more realistic goal of achieving fairness in particular use cases: the criticality of context, the responsibility of LLM developers, and the need for stakeholder participation in an iterative process of design and evaluation. Moreover, it may eventually be possible and even necessary to use the general-purpose capabilities of AI systems to address fairness challenges as a form of scalable AI-assisted alignment.
6/6/2024
Quantifying and Mitigating Unimodal Biases in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Causal Perspective
Meiqi Chen, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, Chaochao Lu
0
0
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have facilitated the development of Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs). Despite their impressive capabilities, MLLMs often suffer from an over-reliance on unimodal biases (e.g., language bias and vision bias), leading to incorrect answers in complex multimodal tasks. To investigate this issue, we propose a causal framework to interpret the biases in Visual Question Answering (VQA) problems. Within our framework, we devise a causal graph to elucidate the predictions of MLLMs on VQA problems, and assess the causal effect of biases through an in-depth causal analysis. Motivated by the causal graph, we introduce a novel MORE dataset, consisting of 12,000 VQA instances. This dataset is designed to challenge MLLMs' abilities, necessitating multi-hop reasoning and the surmounting of unimodal biases. Furthermore, we propose two strategies to mitigate unimodal biases and enhance MLLMs' reasoning capabilities, including a Decompose-Verify-Answer (DeVA) framework for limited-access MLLMs and the refinement of open-source MLLMs through fine-tuning. Extensive quantitative and qualitative experiments offer valuable insights for future research. Our project page is at https://opencausalab.github.io/MORE.
4/4/2024