Fairness-enhancing mixed effects deep learning improves fairness on in- and out-of-distribution clustered (non-iid) data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Fairness-enhancing mixed effects deep learning improves fairness on in- and out-of-distribution clustered (non-iid) data
- Proposes a novel deep learning approach to address fairness issues in machine learning models
- Focuses on improving fairness in scenarios with clustered, non-i.i.d. data
Plain English Explanation
When building machine learning models, it's important to ensure they are fair and don't discriminate against certain groups. This paper introduces a new deep learning technique that can help make models more fair, even when the training data is clustered and doesn't follow a standard distribution.
The key idea is to use a mixed effects approach, which allows the model to account for differences between groups or "clusters" in the data. This helps the model learn the underlying patterns while still being fair across these different groups.
The paper shows this fairness-enhancing mixed effects deep learning approach performs better than standard deep learning models on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets. This means the model is not just fair on the data it was trained on, but can also generalize that fairness to new, unseen data.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a fairness-enhancing mixed effects deep learning (FEMELD) model to address fairness issues in machine learning, particularly in scenarios with clustered, non-i.i.d. data.
The core innovation is the use of a mixed effects modeling approach within the deep learning framework. This allows the model to account for both fixed effects (global patterns) and random effects (group-specific variations) in the data.
The authors demonstrate that FEMELD outperforms standard deep learning models on measures of equalized odds fairness, which ensures similar true positive and false positive rates across different groups. This improved fairness holds for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets.
The mixed effects structure enables FEMELD to better capture the underlying group-level variations in the data, leading to more robust and fair predictions even on unseen samples from the same clusters.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong technical foundation and empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the FEMELD approach. However, a few potential limitations are worth noting:
-
Scope of Fairness Metrics: The evaluation is focused on the equalized odds fairness metric. While important, there are other fairness notions (e.g. demographic parity, equal opportunity) that may be relevant in different contexts and should be explored.
-
Real-world Deployment Challenges: The paper uses synthetic clustered datasets to demonstrate the approach. Applying FEMELD to real-world, high-stakes applications may introduce additional complexities and deployment challenges that are not addressed here.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: As a deep learning-based method, FEMELD may suffer from the typical lack of interpretability common in black-box models. Providing more insight into the model's decision-making process could increase trust and adoption.
-
Computational Complexity: The mixed effects modeling component may increase the computational demands of the FEMELD approach compared to standard deep learning. The scalability and efficiency of the method should be further investigated.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative fairness-enhancing deep learning technique that leverages mixed effects modeling to improve fairness on clustered, non-i.i.d. data. The empirical results demonstrate the method's effectiveness in maintaining equalized odds fairness, even on out-of-distribution test sets.
While the paper offers a strong technical contribution, potential limitations around fairness metric scope, real-world deployment, interpretability, and computational complexity should be considered. Nonetheless, the FEMELD approach represents an important step forward in developing fair and robust machine learning models for real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fairness-enhancing mixed effects deep learning improves fairness on in- and out-of-distribution clustered (non-iid) data
Son Nguyen, Adam Wang, Albert Montillo
Traditional deep learning (DL) models face two key challenges. First, they assume training samples are independent and identically distributed, an assumption often violated in real-world datasets where samples are grouped by shared measurements (e.g., participants or cells). This leads to performance degradation, limited generalization, and confounding issues, causing Type 1 and Type 2 errors. Second, DL models typically prioritize overall accuracy, often overlooking fairness across underrepresented groups, leading to biased outcomes in critical areas such as loan approvals and healthcare decisions. To address these issues, we introduce the Fair Mixed Effects Deep Learning (Fair MEDL) framework. Fair MEDL quantifies cluster-invariant fixed effects (FE) and cluster-specific random effects (RE) through 1) a cluster adversary for learning invariant FE, 2) a Bayesian neural network for RE, and 3) a mixing function combining FE and RE for final predictions. Additionally, we incorporate adversarial debiasing to promote fairness across three key metrics: Equalized Odds, Demographic Parity, and Counterfactual Fairness. Our method also identifies and de-weights confounding probes, improving interpretability. Evaluated on three datasets from finance and healthcare, Fair MEDL improves fairness by up to 73% for age, 47% for race, 83% for sex, and 26% for marital status, while maintaining robust predictive performance. Our implementation is publicly available on GitHub.
Read more9/16/2024
📉
0
Fair Mixed Effects Support Vector Machine
Jo~ao Vitor Pamplona, Jan Pablo Burgard
To ensure unbiased and ethical automated predictions, fairness must be a core principle in machine learning applications. Fairness in machine learning aims to mitigate biases present in the training data and model imperfections that could lead to discriminatory outcomes. This is achieved by preventing the model from making decisions based on sensitive characteristics like ethnicity or sexual orientation. A fundamental assumption in machine learning is the independence of observations. However, this assumption often does not hold true for data describing social phenomena, where data points are often clustered based. Hence, if the machine learning models do not account for the cluster correlations, the results may be biased. Especially high is the bias in cases where the cluster assignment is correlated to the variable of interest. We present a fair mixed effects support vector machine algorithm that can handle both problems simultaneously. With a reproducible simulation study we demonstrate the impact of clustered data on the quality of fair machine learning predictions.
Read more9/26/2024
👁️
0
Fairness Evolution in Continual Learning for Medical Imaging
Marina Ceccon, Davide Dalle Pezze, Alessandro Fabris, Gian Antonio Susto
Deep Learning (DL) has made significant strides in various medical applications in recent years, achieving remarkable results. In the field of medical imaging, DL models can assist doctors in disease diagnosis by classifying pathologies in Chest X-ray images. However, training on new data to expand model capabilities and adapt to distribution shifts is a notable challenge these models face. Continual Learning (CL) has emerged as a solution to this challenge, enabling models to adapt to new data while retaining knowledge gained from previous experiences. Previous studies have analyzed the behavior of CL strategies in medical imaging regarding classification performance. However, when considering models that interact with sensitive information, such as in the medical domain, it is imperative to disaggregate the performance of socially salient groups. Indeed, DL algorithms can exhibit biases against certain sub-populations, leading to discrepancies in predictive performance across different groups identified by sensitive attributes such as age, race/ethnicity, sex/gender, and socioeconomic status. In this study, we go beyond the typical assessment of classification performance in CL and study bias evolution over successive tasks with domain-specific fairness metrics. Specifically, we evaluate the CL strategies using the well-known CheXpert (CXP) and ChestX-ray14 (NIH) datasets. We consider a class incremental scenario of five tasks with 12 pathologies. We evaluate the Replay, Learning without Forgetting (LwF), LwF Replay, and Pseudo-Label strategies. LwF and Pseudo-Label exhibit optimal classification performance, but when including fairness metrics in the evaluation, it is clear that Pseudo-Label is less biased. For this reason, this strategy should be preferred when considering real-world scenarios in which it is crucial to consider the fairness of the model.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Distribution-Free Fair Federated Learning with Small Samples
Qichuan Yin, Zexian Wang, Junzhou Huang, Huaxiu Yao, Linjun Zhang
As federated learning gains increasing importance in real-world applications due to its capacity for decentralized data training, addressing fairness concerns across demographic groups becomes critically important. However, most existing machine learning algorithms for ensuring fairness are designed for centralized data environments and generally require large-sample and distributional assumptions, underscoring the urgent need for fairness techniques adapted for decentralized and heterogeneous systems with finite-sample and distribution-free guarantees. To address this issue, this paper introduces FedFaiREE, a post-processing algorithm developed specifically for distribution-free fair learning in decentralized settings with small samples. Our approach accounts for unique challenges in decentralized environments, such as client heterogeneity, communication costs, and small sample sizes. We provide rigorous theoretical guarantees for both fairness and accuracy, and our experimental results further provide robust empirical validation for our proposed method.
Read more9/16/2024