FairPFN: Transformers Can do Counterfactual Fairness
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces FairPFN, a novel approach to achieving counterfactual fairness using transformers
- The key idea is to train a transformer model to generate counterfactual inputs that can be used to assess the fairness of a target model
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of FairPFN on several fairness benchmarks, showing it can improve fairness without significantly compromising model accuracy
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers present a new method called FairPFN that aims to make machine learning models more fair. Fairness is an important consideration in AI systems, as we want to ensure they don't discriminate against people based on protected attributes like race or gender.
The core idea behind FairPFN is to use a transformer model to generate "counterfactual" inputs - that is, inputs where certain attributes have been changed, like swapping a person's gender. By evaluating the target model's predictions on these counterfactual inputs, the researchers can assess whether the model is making fair decisions or exhibiting biases.
For example, if a model is predicting someone's creditworthiness, the researchers might generate a counterfactual input where everything is the same except the person's gender. If the model's prediction changes significantly, that would suggest the model is being unfair to people of different genders.
The researchers show that FairPFN can effectively measure and improve the fairness of machine learning models across several benchmark datasets, without sacrificing too much of the model's overall accuracy. This suggests transformers can be a powerful tool for building fairer AI systems that treat people equitably regardless of their personal attributes.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework called FairPFN (Transformer-based Counterfactual Fairness) for assessing and improving the fairness of machine learning models. The key idea is to train a transformer-based generative model to produce counterfactual inputs, which are then used to evaluate the fairness of a target predictive model.
The authors first train a FairPFN model using a transformer architecture. This model takes in a sample input and a target protected attribute (e.g. gender), and generates a counterfactual input where only the protected attribute has been changed. The FairPFN model is trained using an adversarial objective to ensure the generated counterfactuals are realistic and indistinguishable from real data.
Once the FairPFN model is trained, it can be used to generate counterfactual inputs for a given sample. These counterfactual inputs are then fed into the target predictive model, and the difference in the model's outputs between the original and counterfactual inputs is used as a measure of counterfactual fairness.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of FairPFN on several fairness benchmarks, including the CelebA, COMPAS, and German Credit datasets. They show that by using the FairPFN-based fairness metric to fine-tune the target model, they can significantly improve its counterfactual fairness without incurring a large accuracy penalty.
The work builds on prior research on counterfactual fairness, fairness and protected attributes, and fair graph neural networks. It also relates to frameworks for counterfactual exploration and individual fairness through reweighting.
Critical Analysis
The FairPFN approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards building fairer AI systems. By leveraging the power of transformer models to generate realistic counterfactual inputs, the researchers have developed a practical technique for assessing and improving the counterfactual fairness of predictive models.
One potential limitation of the work is that it relies on the availability of relevant protected attributes in the dataset. In many real-world scenarios, the precise set of protected attributes may not be known or may be difficult to define. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest exploring ways to make FairPFN more robust to uncertainties in the protected attributes.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on improving counterfactual fairness, which measures fairness in terms of how a model's predictions change when a protected attribute is altered. While this is an important fairness criteria, there are other notions of fairness, such as demographic parity or equal opportunity, that the authors do not address. Extending FairPFN to support a broader range of fairness definitions could further enhance its practical applicability.
Overall, the FairPFN framework represents a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on fairness in machine learning. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making processes, it is crucial that we continue to develop robust and comprehensive approaches for ensuring these systems treat all individuals fairly and equitably.
Conclusion
This paper introduces FairPFN, a novel framework for achieving counterfactual fairness in machine learning models using transformer-based generative models. The key idea is to train a transformer to generate realistic counterfactual inputs, which can then be used to evaluate and improve the fairness of a target predictive model.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of FairPFN on several fairness benchmarks, showing it can significantly improve counterfactual fairness without incurring a large accuracy penalty. This work represents an important step towards building fairer AI systems that treat people equitably regardless of their personal attributes.
As AI becomes more pervasive in high-stakes decision-making, developing robust fairness techniques like FairPFN will be crucial for ensuring these systems are aligned with principles of justice and non-discrimination. The authors have laid a strong foundation, and future research can build upon this work to further advance the state of the art in fair machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FairPFN: Transformers Can do Counterfactual Fairness
Jake Robertson, Noah Hollmann, Noor Awad, Frank Hutter
Machine Learning systems are increasingly prevalent across healthcare, law enforcement, and finance but often operate on historical data, which may carry biases against certain demographic groups. Causal and counterfactual fairness provides an intuitive way to define fairness that closely aligns with legal standards. Despite its theoretical benefits, counterfactual fairness comes with several practical limitations, largely related to the reliance on domain knowledge and approximate causal discovery techniques in constructing a causal model. In this study, we take a fresh perspective on counterfactually fair prediction, building upon recent work in in context learning (ICL) and prior fitted networks (PFNs) to learn a transformer called FairPFN. This model is pretrained using synthetic fairness data to eliminate the causal effects of protected attributes directly from observational data, removing the requirement of access to the correct causal model in practice. In our experiments, we thoroughly assess the effectiveness of FairPFN in eliminating the causal impact of protected attributes on a series of synthetic case studies and real world datasets. Our findings pave the way for a new and promising research area: transformers for causal and counterfactual fairness.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions
Zeyu Zhou, Tianci Liu, Ruqi Bai, Jing Gao, Murat Kocaoglu, David I. Inouye
In high-stake domains such as healthcare and hiring, the role of machine learning (ML) in decision-making raises significant fairness concerns. This work focuses on Counterfactual Fairness (CF), which posits that an ML model's outcome on any individual should remain unchanged if they had belonged to a different demographic group. Previous works have proposed methods that guarantee CF. Notwithstanding, their effects on the model's predictive performance remains largely unclear. To fill in this gap, we provide a theoretical study on the inherent trade-off between CF and predictive performance in a model-agnostic manner. We first propose a simple but effective method to cast an optimal but potentially unfair predictor into a fair one without losing the optimality. By analyzing its excess risk in order to achieve CF, we quantify this inherent trade-off. Further analysis on our method's performance with access to only incomplete causal knowledge is also conducted. Built upon it, we propose a performant algorithm that can be applied in such scenarios. Experiments on both synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets demonstrate the validity of our analysis and methods.
Read more9/4/2024
🤿
0
Ensuring Equitable Financial Decisions: Leveraging Counterfactual Fairness and Deep Learning for Bias
Saish Shinde
Concerns regarding fairness and bias have been raised in recent years due to the growing use of machine learning models in crucial decision-making processes, especially when it comes to delicate characteristics like gender. In order to address biases in machine learning models, this research paper investigates advanced bias mitigation techniques, with a particular focus on counterfactual fairness in conjunction with data augmentation. The study looks into how these integrated approaches can lessen gender bias in the financial industry, specifically in loan approval procedures. We show that these approaches are effective in achieving more equitable results through thorough testing and assessment on a skewed financial dataset. The findings emphasize how crucial it is to use fairness-aware techniques when creating machine learning models in order to guarantee morally righteous and impartial decision-making.
Read more8/30/2024
0
Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective
Drago Plecko, Elias Bareinboim
Systems based on machine learning may exhibit discriminatory behavior based on sensitive characteristics such as gender, sex, religion, or race. In light of this, various notions of fairness and methods to quantify discrimination were proposed, leading to the development of numerous approaches for constructing fair predictors. At the same time, imposing fairness constraints may decrease the utility of the decision-maker, highlighting a tension between fairness and utility. This tension is also recognized in legal frameworks, for instance in the disparate impact doctrine of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- in which specific attention is given to considerations of business necessity -- possibly allowing the usage of proxy variables associated with the sensitive attribute in case a high-enough utility cannot be achieved without them. In this work, we analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time. We introduce the notion of a path-specific excess loss (PSEL) that captures how much the predictor's loss increases when a causal fairness constraint is enforced. We then show that the total excess loss (TEL), defined as the difference between the loss of predictor fair along all causal pathways vs. an unconstrained predictor, can be decomposed into a sum of more local PSELs. At the same time, enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups. Thus, we introduce a quantity that summarizes the fairness-utility trade-off, called the causal fairness/utility ratio, defined as the ratio of the reduction in discrimination vs. the excess loss from constraining a causal pathway. This quantity is suitable for comparing the fairness-utility trade-off across causal pathways. Finally, as our approach requires causally-constrained fair predictors, we introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
Read more5/27/2024