Fast John Ellipsoid Computation with Differential Privacy Optimization
0
๐ ๏ธ
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper presents a fast algorithm for computing the John ellipsoid, which is a key tool in convex optimization and machine learning.
- The algorithm incorporates differential privacy optimization to protect the privacy of the input data.
- The paper claims the algorithm is significantly faster than previous methods for computing the John ellipsoid.
Plain English Explanation
The John ellipsoid is a mathematical construct that is widely used in convex optimization and machine learning. It helps describe the shape and size of datasets in a compact way.
Computing the John ellipsoid is an important but computationally expensive task. This paper presents a new algorithm that can calculate the John ellipsoid much faster than previous methods. Importantly, the algorithm also incorporates differential privacy techniques to protect the privacy of the input data.
Differential privacy means that the algorithm adds a small amount of "noise" to the data in a principled way, so that the final result doesn't reveal sensitive information about individual data points. This is crucial when working with private or sensitive data, like personal information.
Overall, this new algorithm provides a fast and privacy-preserving way to compute the John ellipsoid, which has many applications in optimization and machine learning.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of this paper are:
-
Fast John Ellipsoid Computation: The authors present a new algorithm for computing the John ellipsoid that is significantly faster than previous state-of-the-art methods. They achieve this by using a combination of matrix scaling and Khachiyan's algorithm.
-
Differential Privacy Optimization: The authors incorporate differential privacy techniques into their algorithm to protect the privacy of the input data. This is done by adding carefully calibrated noise to the computations, while still preserving the accuracy of the John ellipsoid.
-
Theoretical Analysis: The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithm, including proofs of its correctness, convergence rate, and differential privacy guarantees.
-
Empirical Evaluation: The authors evaluate their algorithm on a range of benchmarks and real-world datasets, demonstrating significant speedups over existing methods while maintaining strong privacy protections.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a convincing case for the benefits of the proposed algorithm. The authors have thoroughly addressed the key technical challenges and provided strong empirical evidence to support their claims.
However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or areas for future work. For example, the impact of the added noise on the downstream use of the John ellipsoid is not fully explored. Additionally, the algorithm may still be computationally expensive for extremely large datasets, and further optimizations may be needed in those cases.
Overall, this research represents a valuable contribution to the field of convex optimization and differential privacy, with promising applications in machine learning and data analysis.
Conclusion
This paper presents a fast algorithm for computing the John ellipsoid that incorporates differential privacy techniques to protect the privacy of the input data. The authors demonstrate significant speedups over existing methods while maintaining strong privacy guarantees.
The proposed algorithm has the potential to enable more widespread use of the John ellipsoid in applications where privacy is a concern, such as in machine learning with sensitive data. The technical advances and insights from this work could also inspire further research into efficient and privacy-preserving convex optimization algorithms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐ ๏ธ
0
Fast John Ellipsoid Computation with Differential Privacy Optimization
Jiuxiang Gu, Xiaoyu Li, Yingyu Liang, Zhenmei Shi, Zhao Song, Junwei Yu
Determining the John ellipsoid - the largest volume ellipsoid contained within a convex polytope - is a fundamental problem with applications in machine learning, optimization, and data analytics. Recent work has developed fast algorithms for approximating the John ellipsoid using sketching and leverage score sampling techniques. However, these algorithms do not provide privacy guarantees for sensitive input data. In this paper, we present the first differentially private algorithm for fast John ellipsoid computation. Our method integrates noise perturbation with sketching and leverage score sampling to achieve both efficiency and privacy. We prove that (1) our algorithm provides $(epsilon,delta)$-differential privacy, and the privacy guarantee holds for neighboring datasets that are $epsilon_0$-close, allowing flexibility in the privacy definition; (2) our algorithm still converges to a $(1+xi)$-approximation of the optimal John ellipsoid in $O(xi^{-2}(log(n/delta_0) + (Lepsilon_0)^{-2}))$ iterations where $n$ is the number of data point, $L$ is the Lipschitz constant, $delta_0$ is the failure probability, and $epsilon_0$ is the closeness of neighboring input datasets. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the algorithm's convergence and privacy properties, providing a robust approach for balancing utility and privacy in John ellipsoid computation. This is the first differentially private algorithm for fast John ellipsoid computation, opening avenues for future research in privacy-preserving optimization techniques.
Read more8/14/2024
๐ ๏ธ
0
Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky
We introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives. Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(alpha,alpharho^2/2)$-R'enyi differential privacy and finds a $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary point so long as $M=tildeOmegaleft(frac{d}{deltaepsilon^3} + frac{d^{3/2}}{rhodeltaepsilon^2}right)$. This matches the optimal complexity of its non-private zeroth-order analog. Notably, although the objective is not smooth, we have privacy ``for free'' whenever $rho ge sqrt{d}epsilon$.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Robust Constrained Consensus and Inequality-constrained Distributed Optimization with Guaranteed Differential Privacy and Accurate Convergence
Yongqiang Wang, Angelia Nedic
We address differential privacy for fully distributed optimization subject to a shared inequality constraint. By co-designing the distributed optimization mechanism and the differential-privacy noise injection mechanism, we propose the first distributed constrained optimization algorithm that can ensure both provable convergence to a global optimal solution and rigorous $epsilon$-differential privacy, even when the number of iterations tends to infinity. Our approach does not require the Lagrangian function to be strictly convex/concave, and allows the global objective function to be non-separable. As a byproduct of the co-design, we also propose a new constrained consensus algorithm that can achieve rigorous $epsilon$-differential privacy while maintaining accurate convergence, which, to our knowledge, has not been achieved before. Numerical simulation results on a demand response control problem in smart grid confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Optimality of Matrix Mechanism on $ell_p^p$-metric
Jingcheng Liu, Jalaj Upadhyay, Zongrui Zou
In this paper, we introduce the $ell_p^p$-error metric (for $p geq 2$) when answering linear queries under the constraint of differential privacy. We characterize such an error under $(epsilon,delta)$-differential privacy. Before this paper, tight characterization in the hardness of privately answering linear queries was known under $ell_2^2$-error metric (Edmonds et al., STOC 2020) and $ell_p^2$-error metric for unbiased mechanisms (Nikolov and Tang, ITCS 2024). As a direct consequence of our results, we give tight bounds on answering prefix sum and parity queries under differential privacy for all constant $p$ in terms of the $ell_p^p$ error, generalizing the bounds in Henzinger et al. (SODA 2023) for $p=2$.
Read more6/5/2024