Fast Unconstrained Optimization via Hessian Averaging and Adaptive Gradient Sampling Methods

Read original: arXiv:2408.07268 - Published 8/15/2024 by Thomas O'Leary-Roseberry, Raghu Bollapragada
Total Score

0

Fast Unconstrained Optimization via Hessian Averaging and Adaptive Gradient Sampling Methods

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes two new optimization methods for fast unconstrained optimization.
  • The methods use Hessian averaging and adaptive gradient sampling techniques.
  • The goal is to achieve faster convergence and better performance compared to existing methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces two new optimization techniques that can help solve certain types of mathematical problems faster and more efficiently. Optimization problems are common in many fields, from machine learning to engineering, where the goal is to find the "best" solution to a problem.

The first method, Hessian Averaging, uses information about the curvature of the problem (the Hessian matrix) to guide the optimization process. By averaging this curvature information over multiple iterations, the method can converge to the optimal solution more quickly.

The second method, Adaptive Gradient Sampling, adaptively selects which parts of the problem to focus on during the optimization. This can help the algorithm explore the problem space more effectively and find the best solution faster.

By combining these two techniques, the researchers were able to develop optimization methods that outperform existing approaches in terms of speed and efficiency, making them useful for a wide range of applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents two new optimization algorithms for fast unconstrained optimization:

  1. Hessian Averaging: This method uses information about the curvature of the objective function, captured by the Hessian matrix, to guide the optimization process. By averaging the Hessian over multiple iterations, the method can better estimate the local curvature and take more efficient steps towards the optimum.

  2. Adaptive Gradient Sampling: This method adaptively selects which parts of the objective function to focus on during optimization. By dynamically adjusting the sampling distribution, the algorithm can explore the problem space more effectively and converge to the optimal solution faster.

The paper provides theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrating the benefits of these two methods. Compared to existing approaches, the proposed algorithms achieve faster convergence and better performance on a variety of unconstrained optimization problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the proposed optimization methods and their theoretical properties. The authors have carefully designed experiments to evaluate the performance of their algorithms and compare them to state-of-the-art techniques.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on unconstrained optimization problems. In many real-world applications, the optimization problems may involve additional constraints or side conditions that need to be taken into account. It would be interesting to see how the proposed methods could be extended to handle constrained optimization problems as well.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between the computational cost of the Hessian averaging and the adaptive gradient sampling techniques and the overall performance gains. Further investigation into the computational complexity and practical considerations of implementing these methods would be valuable for researchers and practitioners.

Conclusion

The paper presents two novel optimization algorithms, Hessian Averaging and Adaptive Gradient Sampling, that demonstrate significant improvements in convergence speed and performance for unconstrained optimization problems. By leveraging information about the curvature of the objective function and dynamically adjusting the sampling distribution, these methods offer a promising approach for solving a wide range of optimization challenges more efficiently.

The research contributes to the ongoing efforts in the field of optimization and has the potential to benefit various applications that rely on fast and accurate optimization techniques, such as machine learning, control systems, and numerical simulations. The proposed methods provide a valuable addition to the toolbox of optimization techniques and may inspire further advancements in this important area of research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Fast Unconstrained Optimization via Hessian Averaging and Adaptive Gradient Sampling Methods
Total Score

0

Fast Unconstrained Optimization via Hessian Averaging and Adaptive Gradient Sampling Methods

Thomas O'Leary-Roseberry, Raghu Bollapragada

We consider minimizing finite-sum and expectation objective functions via Hessian-averaging based subsampled Newton methods. These methods allow for gradient inexactness and have fixed per-iteration Hessian approximation costs. The recent work (Na et al. 2023) demonstrated that Hessian averaging can be utilized to achieve fast $mathcal{O}left(sqrt{tfrac{log k}{k}}right)$ local superlinear convergence for strongly convex functions in high probability, while maintaining fixed per-iteration Hessian costs. These methods, however, require gradient exactness and strong convexity, which poses challenges for their practical implementation. To address this concern we consider Hessian-averaged methods that allow gradient inexactness via norm condition based adaptive-sampling strategies. For the finite-sum problem we utilize deterministic sampling techniques which lead to global linear and sublinear convergence rates for strongly convex and nonconvex functions respectively. In this setting we are able to derive an improved deterministic local superlinear convergence rate of $mathcal{O}left(tfrac{1}{k}right)$. For the %expected risk expectation problem we utilize stochastic sampling techniques, and derive global linear and sublinear rates for strongly convex and nonconvex functions, as well as a $mathcal{O}left(tfrac{1}{sqrt{k}}right)$ local superlinear convergence rate, all in expectation. We present novel analysis techniques that differ from the previous probabilistic results. Additionally, we propose scalable and efficient variations of these methods via diagonal approximations and derive the novel diagonally-averaged Newton (Dan) method for large-scale problems. Our numerical results demonstrate that the Hessian averaging not only helps with convergence, but can lead to state-of-the-art performance on difficult problems such as CIFAR100 classification with ResNets.

Read more

8/15/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Stochastic Newton Proximal Extragradient Method

Ruichen Jiang, Micha{l} Derezi'nski, Aryan Mokhtari

Stochastic second-order methods achieve fast local convergence in strongly convex optimization by using noisy Hessian estimates to precondition the gradient. However, these methods typically reach superlinear convergence only when the stochastic Hessian noise diminishes, increasing per-iteration costs over time. Recent work in [arXiv:2204.09266] addressed this with a Hessian averaging scheme that achieves superlinear convergence without higher per-iteration costs. Nonetheless, the method has slow global convergence, requiring up to $tilde{O}(kappa^2)$ iterations to reach the superlinear rate of $tilde{O}((1/t)^{t/2})$, where $kappa$ is the problem's condition number. In this paper, we propose a novel stochastic Newton proximal extragradient method that improves these bounds, achieving a faster global linear rate and reaching the same fast superlinear rate in $tilde{O}(kappa)$ iterations. We accomplish this by extending the Hybrid Proximal Extragradient (HPE) framework, achieving fast global and local convergence rates for strongly convex functions with access to a noisy Hessian oracle.

Read more

6/4/2024

An Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Method with Non-negative Gauss-Newton Stepsizes
Total Score

1

An Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Method with Non-negative Gauss-Newton Stepsizes

Antonio Orvieto, Lin Xiao

We consider the problem of minimizing the average of a large number of smooth but possibly non-convex functions. In the context of most machine learning applications, each loss function is non-negative and thus can be expressed as the composition of a square and its real-valued square root. This reformulation allows us to apply the Gauss-Newton method, or the Levenberg-Marquardt method when adding a quadratic regularization. The resulting algorithm, while being computationally as efficient as the vanilla stochastic gradient method, is highly adaptive and can automatically warmup and decay the effective stepsize while tracking the non-negative loss landscape. We provide a tight convergence analysis, leveraging new techniques, in the stochastic convex and non-convex settings. In particular, in the convex case, the method does not require access to the gradient Lipshitz constant for convergence, and is guaranteed to never diverge. The convergence rates and empirical evaluations compare favorably to the classical (stochastic) gradient method as well as to several other adaptive methods.

Read more

7/8/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Unbiased least squares regression via averaged stochastic gradient descent

Nabil Kahal'e

We consider an on-line least squares regression problem with optimal solution $theta^*$ and Hessian matrix H, and study a time-average stochastic gradient descent estimator of $theta^*$. For $kge2$, we provide an unbiased estimator of $theta^*$ that is a modification of the time-average estimator, runs with an expected number of time-steps of order k, with O(1/k) expected excess risk. The constant behind the O notation depends on parameters of the regression and is a poly-logarithmic function of the smallest eigenvalue of H. We provide both a biased and unbiased estimator of the expected excess risk of the time-average estimator and of its unbiased counterpart, without requiring knowledge of either H or $theta^*$. We describe an average-start version of our estimators with similar properties. Our approach is based on randomized multilevel Monte Carlo. Our numerical experiments confirm our theoretical findings.

Read more

6/28/2024