Fetch-A-Set: A Large-Scale OCR-Free Benchmark for Historical Document Retrieval

Overview

• This paper presents a large-scale, OCR-free benchmark for historical document retrieval called Fetch-A-Set.
• The benchmark includes a dataset of 1.2 million historical documents from the U.S. Congress, along with query sets and relevance judgments for evaluating document retrieval systems.
• The authors argue that existing benchmarks for historical document retrieval have limitations, such as relying on OCR-processed text, which can be error-prone, or focusing on narrow domains like scientific papers.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have created a new dataset and benchmark for testing systems that can retrieve relevant historical documents. This is important because [object Object] is a challenging task, and existing benchmarks have some limitations.

The dataset they created, called Fetch-A-Set, contains over 1.2 million historical documents from the U.S. Congress. These documents are not processed using optical character recognition (OCR), which can sometimes make mistakes when converting scanned images into text. Instead, the researchers provide the original document images, allowing systems to work directly with the visual information.

Along with the document collection, the researchers also created query sets and relevance judgments. This means they have defined a set of questions or search queries that people might use to find relevant documents, and they've identified which documents in the collection are most relevant to each query. This allows researchers to evaluate how well different document retrieval systems perform on this task.

The researchers argue that this benchmark is a significant improvement over existing options, which may be limited to specific domains (like scientific papers) or rely on potentially error-prone OCR processing. By providing a large, diverse dataset of historical documents and a standardized way to evaluate retrieval systems, the Fetch-A-Set benchmark can help advance the field of historical document retrieval.

Technical Explanation

The Fetch-A-Set benchmark consists of a dataset of 1.2 million historical documents from the U.S. Congress, along with query sets and relevance judgments for evaluating document retrieval systems. The documents are provided as original image files, rather than relying on OCR-processed text, which can be error-prone.

The dataset covers a diverse range of topics and genres, including legislative bills, committee reports, and congressional records. The researchers argue that this breadth is important, as existing benchmarks tend to focus on more narrow domains, such as scientific papers or newspapers.

To create the query sets and relevance judgments, the researchers crowd-sourced a set of search queries that users might use to find relevant historical documents. They then had human annotators review the documents and identify the most relevant ones for each query.

The researchers evaluated several baseline document retrieval systems on the Fetch-A-Set benchmark, including approaches based on text similarity, visual similarity, and hybrid methods that combine both. Their results show that the benchmark provides a challenging and meaningful test of document retrieval capabilities, with room for further improvement by future systems.

Critical Analysis

The Fetch-A-Set benchmark addresses an important gap in the historical document retrieval literature by providing a large-scale, OCR-free dataset and evaluation framework. This is a significant contribution, as existing benchmarks often rely on error-prone OCR processing or focus on narrow domains.

One potential limitation of the Fetch-A-Set dataset is that it is limited to U.S. Congressional documents. While this is a relevant and important source of historical information, the benchmark may not fully capture the diversity of historical document collections that researchers and practitioners may encounter in the real world.

Additionally, the authors note that the current version of the benchmark focuses on document-level retrieval, rather than more fine-grained passage-level retrieval. Expanding the benchmark to include passage-level relevance judgments could be a valuable direction for future work.

Overall, the Fetch-A-Set benchmark represents a significant advancement in the field of historical document retrieval. By providing a large-scale, standardized evaluation framework, the authors have opened up new avenues for research and development in this important area.

Conclusion

The Fetch-A-Set benchmark offers a new, large-scale, OCR-free dataset and evaluation framework for historical document retrieval. By providing access to original document images and a diverse set of query-document relevance judgments, the benchmark can help drive progress in developing more robust and effective document retrieval systems.

The benchmark's focus on historical documents from the U.S. Congress adds valuable real-world relevance, and the authors' thoughtful design choices, such as avoiding the use of potentially error-prone OCR, make Fetch-A-Set a valuable resource for the research community. As the field of historical document retrieval continues to evolve, the Fetch-A-Set benchmark is poised to play a key role in advancing the state of the art.