Fine-grained Analysis and Faster Algorithms for Iteratively Solving Linear Systems
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the challenge of characterizing the time complexity of iterative methods for solving large systems of linear equations, particularly when comparing deterministic and stochastic methods that may or may not use preconditioning and/or fast matrix multiplication.
- The authors introduce a new notion of complexity called the spectral tail condition number, which considers the ratio between the $\ell$th largest and the smallest singular value of the matrix representing the system.
- The main algorithmic result is a guarantee that the Sketch-and-Project with Nesterov's acceleration method can find an approximate solution in time $\tilde{O}(\kappa_\ell \cdot n^2 \log 1/\epsilon)$ for a certain range of $\ell$.
- The implications of this result include a potential separation between deterministic and stochastic iterative solvers, as well as a connection between the complexity of iterative solvers and advances in fast matrix multiplication algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
Solving large systems of linear equations is an important problem in various fields, such as science and engineering. Iterative methods, which repeatedly update an approximate solution, are commonly used to tackle these large systems. However, the performance of these methods can be significantly affected by a problem-specific quantity called the condition number.
The authors of this paper introduce a new way to measure the complexity of iterative solvers, called the spectral tail condition number. This measure focuses on the ratio between the $\ell$th largest and the smallest singular values of the matrix representing the system, rather than the traditional condition number that considers the entire spectrum.
By using this new complexity measure, the authors demonstrate that the Sketch-and-Project with Nesterov's acceleration method can efficiently find an approximate solution to the linear system. Specifically, they show that this method can achieve the desired accuracy in a time that depends on the spectral tail condition number, rather than the traditional condition number.
This result suggests that the choice between deterministic and stochastic iterative solvers may be more nuanced than previously thought, as the new complexity measure can lead to different comparisons between these approaches. Additionally, the authors highlight the connection between the complexity of iterative solvers and the ongoing algorithmic advances in fast matrix multiplication, as the bound on the parameter $\ell$ improves with the matrix multiplication exponent.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a fine-grained complexity analysis of iterative methods for solving large systems of linear equations, with a focus on the role of the problem-dependent condition number. The authors introduce the notion of the spectral tail condition number, $\kappa_\ell$, which is defined as the ratio between the $\ell$th largest and the smallest singular value of the matrix representing the system.
The main algorithmic result is a guarantee that the Sketch-and-Project with Nesterov's acceleration method can find an approximate solution $\tilde{x}$ such that $|A\tilde{x} - b| \leq \epsilon |b|$ in time $\tilde{O}(\kappa_\ell \cdot n^2 \log 1/\epsilon)$, for any $\ell = O(n^{1/(\omega-1)}) = O(n^{0.729})$, where $\omega \approx 2.372$ is the current fast matrix multiplication exponent.
The authors' technical contributions include new sharp characterizations of the first and second moments of the random projection matrix that commonly arises in sketching algorithms. These results build on a combination of techniques from combinatorial sampling via determinantal point processes and Gaussian universality results from random matrix theory.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and technically sophisticated approach to analyzing the complexity of iterative linear solvers, which can have significant implications for the field. However, the analysis relies on several assumptions and may not directly translate to practical scenarios.
One potential limitation is the focus on the spectral tail condition number, $\kappa_\ell$, which may not always be the most relevant measure of complexity for a given problem. In some cases, the traditional condition number may still be the more appropriate metric to consider.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of the Sketch-and-Project method with other popular iterative solvers, such as the Conjugate Gradient method. While the authors suggest their approach can lead to a stronger separation between deterministic and stochastic methods, more empirical evidence may be needed to fully support this claim.
Furthermore, the reliance on the fast matrix multiplication exponent, $\omega$, means that the practical implications of the results may change as algorithmic progress is made in this area. It would be interesting to see how the analysis and conclusions hold up as the state-of-the-art in fast matrix multiplication continues to evolve.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing the complexity of iterative methods for solving large systems of linear equations, introducing the concept of the spectral tail condition number. The authors demonstrate that the Sketch-and-Project with Nesterov's acceleration method can achieve strong performance guarantees under this new complexity measure, potentially leading to a better understanding of the relative strengths of deterministic and stochastic iterative solvers.
The technical contributions of the paper, including the sharp characterizations of random projection matrices, represent a significant advancement in the field of numerical linear algebra. While the analysis relies on several assumptions and may not directly translate to all practical scenarios, the insights and connections drawn to fast matrix multiplication algorithms suggest that this work could have far-reaching implications for the design and analysis of future iterative solvers.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
Fine-grained Analysis and Faster Algorithms for Iteratively Solving Linear Systems
Micha{l} Derezi'nski, Daniel LeJeune, Deanna Needell, Elizaveta Rebrova
While effective in practice, iterative methods for solving large systems of linear equations can be significantly affected by problem-dependent condition number quantities. This makes characterizing their time complexity challenging, particularly when we wish to make comparisons between deterministic and stochastic methods, that may or may not rely on preconditioning and/or fast matrix multiplication. In this work, we consider a fine-grained notion of complexity for iterative linear solvers which we call the spectral tail condition number, $kappa_ell$, defined as the ratio between the $ell$th largest and the smallest singular value of the matrix representing the system. Concretely, we prove the following main algorithmic result: Given an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$ and a vector $b$, we can find $tilde{x}$ such that $|Atilde{x}-b|leqepsilon|b|$ in time $tilde{O}(kappa_ellcdot n^2log 1/epsilon)$ for any $ell = O(n^{frac1{omega-1}})=O(n^{0.729})$, where $omega approx 2.372$ is the current fast matrix multiplication exponent. This guarantee is achieved by Sketch-and-Project with Nesterov's acceleration. Some of the implications of our result, and of the use of $kappa_ell$, include direct improvement over a fine-grained analysis of the Conjugate Gradient method, suggesting a stronger separation between deterministic and stochastic iterative solvers; and relating the complexity of iterative solvers to the ongoing algorithmic advances in fast matrix multiplication, since the bound on $ell$ improves with $omega$. Our main technical contributions are new sharp characterizations for the first and second moments of the random projection matrix that commonly arises in sketching algorithms, building on a combination of techniques from combinatorial sampling via determinantal point processes and Gaussian universality results from random matrix theory.
Read more5/10/2024
📉
0
Solving Dense Linear Systems Faster Than via Preconditioning
Micha{l} Derezi'nski, Jiaming Yang
We give a stochastic optimization algorithm that solves a dense $ntimes n$ real-valued linear system $Ax=b$, returning $tilde x$ such that $|Atilde x-b|leq epsilon|b|$ in time: $$tilde O((n^2+nk^{omega-1})log1/epsilon),$$ where $k$ is the number of singular values of $A$ larger than $O(1)$ times its smallest positive singular value, $omega < 2.372$ is the matrix multiplication exponent, and $tilde O$ hides a poly-logarithmic in $n$ factor. When $k=O(n^{1-theta})$ (namely, $A$ has a flat-tailed spectrum, e.g., due to noisy data or regularization), this improves on both the cost of solving the system directly, as well as on the cost of preconditioning an iterative method such as conjugate gradient. In particular, our algorithm has an $tilde O(n^2)$ runtime when $k=O(n^{0.729})$. We further adapt this result to sparse positive semidefinite matrices and least squares regression. Our main algorithm can be viewed as a randomized block coordinate descent method, where the key challenge is simultaneously ensuring good convergence and fast per-iteration time. In our analysis, we use theory of majorization for elementary symmetric polynomials to establish a sharp convergence guarantee when coordinate blocks are sampled using a determinantal point process. We then use a Markov chain coupling argument to show that similar convergence can be attained with a cheaper sampling scheme, and accelerate the block coordinate descent update via matrix sketching.
Read more6/10/2024
🚀
0
Faster Linear Systems and Matrix Norm Approximation via Multi-level Sketched Preconditioning
Micha{l} Derezi'nski, Christopher Musco, Jiaming Yang
We present a new class of preconditioned iterative methods for solving linear systems of the form $Ax = b$. Our methods are based on constructing a low-rank Nystrom approximation to $A$ using sparse random sketching. This approximation is used to construct a preconditioner, which itself is inverted quickly using additional levels of random sketching and preconditioning. We prove that the convergence of our methods depends on a natural average condition number of $A$, which improves as the rank of the Nystrom approximation increases. Concretely, this allows us to obtain faster runtimes for a number of fundamental linear algebraic problems: 1. We show how to solve any $ntimes n$ linear system that is well-conditioned except for $k$ outlying large singular values in $tilde{O}(n^{2.065} + k^omega)$ time, improving on a recent result of [Derezi'nski, Yang, STOC 2024] for all $k gtrsim n^{0.78}$. 2. We give the first $tilde{O}(n^2 + {d_lambda}^{omega}$) time algorithm for solving a regularized linear system $(A + lambda I)x = b$, where $A$ is positive semidefinite with effective dimension $d_lambda$. This problem arises in applications like Gaussian process regression. 3. We give faster algorithms for approximating Schatten $p$-norms and other matrix norms. For example, for the Schatten 1 (nuclear) norm, we give an algorithm that runs in $tilde{O}(n^{2.11})$ time, improving on an $tilde{O}(n^{2.18})$ method of [Musco et al., ITCS 2018]. Interestingly, previous state-of-the-art algorithms for most of the problems above relied on stochastic iterative methods, like stochastic coordinate and gradient descent. Our work takes a completely different approach, instead leveraging tools from matrix sketching.
Read more5/10/2024
🏅
0
QR factorization of ill-conditioned tall-and-skinny matrices on distributed-memory systems
Nenad Miji'c, Abhiram Kaushik, Davor Davidovi'c
In this paper we present a novel algorithm developed for computing the QR factorisation of extremely ill-conditioned tall-and-skinny matrices on distributed memory systems. The algorithm is based on the communication-avoiding CholeskyQR2 algorithm and its block Gram-Schmidt variant. The latter improves the numerical stability of the CholeskyQR2 algorithm and significantly reduces the loss of orthogonality even for matrices with condition numbers up to $10^{15}$. Currently, there is no distributed GPU version of this algorithm available in the literature which prevents the application of this method to very large matrices. In our work we provide a distributed implementation of this algorithm and also introduce a modified version that improves the performance, especially in the case of extremely ill-conditioned matrices. The main innovation of our approach lies in the interleaving of the CholeskyQR steps with the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalisation, which ensures that update steps are performed with fully orthogonalised panels. The obtained orthogonality and numerical stability of our modified algorithm is equivalent to CholeskyQR2 with Gram-Schmidt and other state-of-the-art methods. Weak scaling tests performed with our test matrices show significant performance improvements. In particular, our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art Householder-based QR factorisation algorithms available in ScaLAPACK by a factor of $6$ on CPU-only systems and up to $80times$ on GPU-based systems with distributed memory.
Read more5/8/2024